Gender, Culture and Epistemic Injustice

Open access

Abstract

Analysing the Swedish Migration authorities’ assessment of asylum applications, the article examines how discretionary space is used concerning gender, culture and the possibility of protection in the country of origin. Gendered victims of both sexes are disregarded. Although the verdicts depend on applicants’ narratives, the scope of applicants’ narrative authority is very limited, and resistance is silenced in favour of authorities’ predominant views of culture. Country information is used to sustain one-dimensional views of culture and to exaggerate the possibility of protection in the country of origin, which denies gender-based claims for protection in the asylum country

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anker D 2001 ‘Refugee status and violence against women in the domestic sphere: the non-state actor question’ Georgetown Immigration Journal vol. 15 no. 3 pp. 391-402.

  • Anthias F 2005 ‘Social stratification and social inequality: models of intersectionality and identity’ in Rethinking class: culture identities and lifestyle eds F Devine M Savage J Scott & R Crompton Palgrave/MacMillan Basingstoke pp. 24-45.

  • Anthias F 2012 ‘Transnational mobilities migration research and intersectionality Nordic Journal of Migration Research vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 102-110 DOI:10.2478/v10202-011-0032-y.

  • Baumann G 1996 Contesting culture: discourses of identity in multiethnic London University Press Cambridge.

  • Berg L & Millbank J 2009 Constructing the personal narratives of lesbian gay and bisexual asylum claimants Journal of Refugee Studies vol. 22 no. 2 pp. 195-223 DOI:10.1093jrs/fepOlO.

  • Bexelius M 2008 Asylrätt kön och politik: en handbok RAF Stockholm.

  • Bhabha HK 1994 The location of culture Routledge London.

  • Bhabha J 1996 ‘Embodied rights: gender persecution state sovereignty and refugees’ Public Culture vol. 9 no. 1 pp. 3-32 DOI:10.1215/08992363-9-1-3.

  • Blommaert J 2001 ‘Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers’ stories in Belgium’ Discourse and Society vol. 12 no. 4 pp. 413-449 DOI:10.1177/0957926501012004002.

  • Butler J 1990 Gender trouble Routledge New York.

  • Edwards A 2010 Transitioning gender: feminist engagement with international refugee law and policy 1950-2010 Refugee Survey Quarterly vol. 29 no 2 pp. 21-45 DOI:10.1093/rsq/hdq021.

  • Flärd H 2007 ‘The use misuse and non-use of country of origin information in the Swedish asylum process’ SRAC Stockholm.

  • Folkelius K & Noll G 1998 ‘Affirmative exclusion? Sex gender persecution and the reformed Swedish Aliens Act’ International Journal of Refugee Law vol. 10 no. 4 pp. 607-636 DOI:10.1093/ ijrl/10.4.607.

  • Fricker M 2007 Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing University Press Oxford DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001.

  • Hall S 1993 ‘Cultural identity and diaspora’ in Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: a reader eds P Williams & L Chrisman New York Harvester Wheatsheaf pp. 392-403.

  • Heger Boyle E & Busse E 2006 ‘Institutional vulnerability and opportunity. Immigration and America´s ‘war on terror´’ Law and Social Inquiry vol. 31 no. 4 pp. 947-974.

  • LaViolette N 2007 ‘Gender-related refugee claims: expanding the scope of the Canadian guidelines’ International Journal of Refugee Law vol. 19 no. 2 pp. 169-214 DOI:10.1093/ijrl/ eem008.

  • Magnusson E Rönnblom M & Silius H (eds) 2008 Critical studies of gender equalities: Nordic dislocations dilemmas and contradictions Makadam Göteborg/Stockholm.

  • McKinnon S 2008 The discursive formation of gender in women´s gendered claims to U.S. asylum Arizona State University Arizona.

  • Mohanty CT 2003 Feminism without borders Duke University Press Durham/London.

  • Noll G 2006 ‘Asylum claims and the translation of culture into politics’ Texas International Law Journal vol. 41 no. 3 pp. 491-501.

  • Oxford CG 2005 ‘Protectors and victims in the gender regime of asylum’ National Women’s Studies Association Journal vol. 17 no. 3 pp. 18-38 DOI:10.1353/nwsa.2005.0066.

  • Proposition 2005/06:06 ‘Regeringens proposition: flyktingskap och förföljelse på grund av kön eller sexuell läggning’.

  • Razack S 2004 ‘Imperilled muslim women dangerous muslim men and civilised Europeans: legal and social responses to forced marriages’ Feminist Legal Studies vol. 12 no. 2 pp. 129-174 DOI:10.1023/B:FEST.0000043305.66172.92.

  • Segenstedt A & Stern R 2011 Vad krävs för att få skydd? Röda korset Stockholm.

  • Somers M 1994 ‘The narrative constitution of identity: a relational and network approach’ Theory and Society vol. 23 no. 5 pp. 605-649 DOI:10.1007/BF00992905.

  • SOU 2006:6 Skyddsgrundsdirektivet och svensk rätt.

  • Spijkerboer T 2000 Gender and refugee status Ashgate London.

  • Talja S 1999 ‘Analyzing qualitative interview data: the discourse analytic method’ Library and Information Science Research vol. 12 no. 4 pp. 459-77 DOI:10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00024-9.

  • Thomas R 2011 Administrative justice and asylum appeals: a study of tribunal adjudication Hart Oxford/Portland.

  • UNHCR 2008 Handbook for the protection of women and girls UNHCR Geneva.

  • Wettergren Å & Wikström H 2013/2014 ‘Who is a refugee? The categorisation of Somali applicants in Sweden´ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 40 no. 4 pp. 566-583 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2013.830502.

  • Wikström H 2007 (O)möjliga positioner: familjer från Iran & postkoloniala reflektioner Göteborgs universitet Göteborg.

  • Wilton S 2009 ‘Promoting equality? Gendered messages in state materials for new immigrants’ Social and Legal Studies vol. 18 no. 4 pp. 437-454 DOI:10.1177/0964663909345093. 218

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 566 383 34
PDF Downloads 301 169 21