Canada as an Inspirational Model: Reforming Scandinavian Immigration and Integration Policies

Open access

Abstract

The Scandinavian countries have often been portrayed as models for the development of policies for other states. However, in the area of immigration and integration policies, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden have themselves been searching for new policy solutions abroad. Canada is internationally recognised in the areas of immigration control and immigrant integration, and this article focuses on the role the Canadian immigration and integration policy model played in the Scandinavian reform process during the 2000-2012 period. The overall conclusion is that the Canadian model significantly shaped the reform debate and process in the three Scandinavian countries. However, the Canadian model was not copied or emulated to a great extent. Instead, it served as intellectual stimulus and a model for inspiration. In particular, the Canadian model served as an inspiration for the rediscovery of labour immigration in Scandinavia during the 2000s.

Abu-Laban, Y & Gabriel, C 2002, Selling diversity : Immigration, multiculturalism, employment equity, and globalization, Broadview Press, Peterborough, Ont.

Andersen, J, Larsen, JE & Møller, IH 2009, ‘The exclusion and marginalisation of immigrants in the Danish welfare society’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, vol. 29, no. 5/6, pp. 274-286. DOI: 10.1108/01443330910965804.

Anton, TJ 1969, ‘Policy-making and political culture in Sweden’, Scandinavian Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 88-102. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1467-9477.1969.tb00521.x.

Banting K, 2010, ‘Is there a progressive’s dilemma in Canada? Immigration, multiculturalism and the welfare state’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 797-820. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423910000983.

Banting, K & Kymlicka, W 2006, Multiculturalism and the welfare state, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Bennett, CJ 1991, ‘How states utilize foreign evidence’, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31-54. Doi:10.1017/ S0143814X0000492X

Benson, D & Jordan, A 2011, ‘What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited’, Political Studies Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 366-378. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x.

Borevi, K 2012, ‘Sweden: The flagship of multiculturalism’, in Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state 1945-2010, eds G Brochmann & A Hagelund, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 25-96.

Brochmann, G 2003, ‘Citizens of multicultural states’, in The multicultural challenge, ed G Brochmann, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 1-11.

Brochmann, G & Hagelund, A 2011, ‘Migrants in the Scandinavian welfare state’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13-24. DOI: 10.2478/v10202-011-0003-3.

Brochmann, G & Hagelund, A 2012, Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state 1945-2010, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Dolowitz, D & Marsh, D 2000, ‘Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making’, Governance, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5-23. DOI: 10.1111/0952-1895.00121.

Einhorn, ES & Logue, J 1989, Modern welfare states: politics and policies in social democratic Scandinavia, Praeger, New York.

Elder, N, Thomas, AH & Arter, D 1988, The consensual democracies? The government and politics of the Scandinavian states, Blackwell, Oxford.

Emilsson, H 2011, Vad kan vi lära av Kanadas migrations- og integrationspolitik? Available from: http://integrationsbloggen.blogspot.ca/2011/03/den-kanadensiska-modellen-oversatt-till.html [Last accessed 10.05.2013].

Hoberg, G 1991, ‘Sleeping with an elephant: the American influence on Canadian environmental regulation’, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 107-131. DOI: 10.2307/4007340.

Hojem, P & Ådahl, M 2011, Kanadamodellen, FORES, Stockholm.

Information 2002, ‘’Et foregangsland’, 26. januar. Available from: http://www.information.dk/65291. [Last accessed 28.02.2013].

Innst. 2005, nr. 185 (2004-2005): Innstilling fra kommunalkomiteen om mangfold gjennom inkludering og deltakelse, Stortinget, Oslo.

Jønsson, HV & Petersen, K 2012, ‘Denmark: a national welfare state meets the world’, in Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state 1945 - 2010, eds G Brochmann & A Hagelund, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 97-148.

Koning, EA 2011, ‘Ethnic and civic dealings with newcomers: naturalization policies and practices in twenty-six immigration countries’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1974-1994. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.556747.

Koning, EA & Banting, K 2011, ‘The Canadian model of immigration and welfare’, in NOU, 2011:7 - Velferd og migrasjon: den norske modellens framtid, pp. 354-371.

Kymlicka, W 2004, ‘Marketing Canadian pluralism in the international arena’, International Journal, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 829-852.

Kymlicka, W 2007a, ‘The Canadian model of multiculturalism in a comparative perspective’, in Multiculturalism and the Canadian constitution, ed S Tierney, UBC Press, Vancouver, pp. 61-90.

Kymlicka, W 2007b. Multicultural odysseys, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kymlicka, W 2007c. ‘Disentangling the debate’, in Uneasy partners multiculturalism and rights in Canada, ed J Stein, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ont., pp. 137-156.

Laczko, LS 1994, ‘Canada’s pluralism in comparative perspective’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 20-41. DOI:10.10 80/01419870.1994.9993811.

Lenard, PT & Straehle, C 2012, Legislated inequality: temporary labour migration in Canada, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.

Lisheng, D, Christensen, T & Painter, M 2010, ‘A case study of China’s administrative reform’, The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 170-188. DOI: 10.1177/0275074009334075.

Marwah, I, Triadafilopoulos, T, & White S 2013, ‘Immigration, citizenship and Canada’s new Conservative Party’, in Conservatism in Canada, ed. DM Rayside and JH Farney, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 95-119.

Mylenberg, T 1997, ‘Weiss: Arbejde er den bedste integration’, Berlingske, p. 5.

NOU 2000:32, Lov om erverv og tap av norsk statsborgerskap (Statsborgerloven), Statens Forvaltningstjeneste, Oslo.

NOU 2004:20, Ny Utlendingslov, Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Oslo.

NOU 2011:7, Velferd og migrasjon: den norske modellens framtid, Statens Forvaltningstjeneste, Oslo.

NOU 2011:14, Bedre integrering: mål, strategier, tiltak, Statens Forvaltningstjeneste, Oslo.

OECD 2012a, International migration outlook. Available from: . [Last accessed 10.1.2013].

OECD 2012b, ‘Key information on migration policy and migration statistics by country’. Available from: . [Last accessed 5.4.2013].

Olsen, JP & Peters, BG 1996, Lessons from experience, Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.

Olwig, KF & Paerregaard, K 2011, The question of integration: immigration, exclusion and the Danish welfare state, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.

Ot.prp. 2002, nr. 28 (2002-2003): Om lov om introduksjonsordning for nyankomne innvandrere (introduksjonsloven), Kommunalog regionaldepartementet, Oslo.

Ot.prp. 2005, nr. 41 (2004-2005): Om lov om norsk statsborgerskap (statsborgerloven), Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet, Oslo.

Ot.prp. 2007, nr. 75 (2006-2007) Om lov om utlendingers adgang til riket og deres opphold her (utlendingsloven), Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet, Oslo.

Proposition 2008, 2007/08:147: Nya regler för arbetskraftsinvandring, Rikdsagen, Stockholm.

Proposition 2010, 2009/10:77: Försörjningskrav vid anhöriginvandring, Rikdsagen, Stockholm Rose, R 1991, ‘What is lesson-drawing?’, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 3-30. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X00004918.

Rose, R 1993, Lesson-drawing in public policy. Chatham House Publishers, Chatham.

Schmidtke, O 2003, ‘Das kanadische Einwanderungsmodell: wohlverstandenes Eigeninteresse und multikulturelles Ethos’, in Migration im Spannungsfeld von Globalisierung und nationalstaat, eds D Thränhardt & U Hunger,Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 205-226.

SOU 1999:34, Svenskt medborgarskap, Regeringskanseliet, Stockholm.

SOU 2002:13, Vår anhöriginvandring, Regeringskanseliet, Stockholm.

SOU 2005:50, Arbetskraftsinvandring till Sverige - befolkningsutveckling, arbetsmarknad i förändring, internationell utblick, Regeringskanseliet, Stockholm.

SOU 2006:87, Arbetskraftsinvandring till Sverige - förslag och konsekvenser, Regeringskanseliet, Stockholm.

St.meld. 2004, Nr. 49 (2003-2004): Mangfold gjennom inkludering og deltakelse: ansvar og frihet, Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet, Oslo.

St.meld. 2008, Nr. 18 (2007-2008): Arbeidsinnvandring, Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet, Oslo.

St.meld. 2012, Nr. 6 (2012-2013): En helhetlig integreringspolitikk: mangfold og fellesskap, Barne-, likestillings- og inkluderingsdepartementet, Oslo.

Tænketanken om Udfordringer for Integrationsindsatsen i Danmark, 2004, Udlændinge- og integrationspolitikken i Danmark og udvalgte lande. Ministeriet for Flygtninge, indvandrere og integration, København.

Triadafilopoulos, T 2006, ‘A model for Europe? an appraisal of Canadian integration policies’, in Politische Steuerung von Integrationsprozessen, eds K Schönwälder, S Baringhorst, & U. Hunger, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp. 79-94.

UDI 2005, Anmodningsvedtak fra Stortinget om forsørgeransvar for herboende referanse ved familieinnvandring for ektefeller.

Velfærdskommissionen 2005, Fremtidens velfærd - vores valg, Velfærdskommissionen, København.

Wickström, M 2013, ‘The difference white ethnics made: the multiculturalist turn of Sweden in comparison to the cases of Canada and Denmark’, in Migrations and welfare states, eds HV Jønsson, E Onasch, S Pellander and M Wickström, NordWel, Helsinki, pp. 25-58.

Journal Information

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 583 583 75
PDF Downloads 255 255 44