Closer to the Truth:

Open access

Abstract

DNA profiling is used to verify the claimed parentage of immigrants who apply for family reunification in at least 20 industrialised countries. Finland was one of the pioneers in the adoption of the technology. While laboratory practices are relatively similar, there are considerable differences between countries in the ways DNA profiling is used in decision-making. In this article, DNA testing is studied in the context of the Finnish migration regime in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Analysis of policy documents and interviews with immigration experts demonstrate the entwining and modification of two policy rationales: securing human rights and combating fraud.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aalas E 1991 Somalishokki Suomen Pakolaisapu Helsinki.

  • Aas KF 2006 ‘The body does not lie: identity risk and trust in technoculture’ Crime Media Culture vol. 2 no. 2 pp. 143-158.

  • Bledsow CH & Snow P 2011 ‘Family reunification ideals and the practices of transnational reproductive life among Africans in Europe’ in Reproduction globalization and the state: newtheoretical and ethnographic perspectives eds CH Browner & CF Sargent Duke University Press Durham pp. 127-191.

  • Bröckling U Krasmann S & Lemke T (eds) 2011 Governmentality:current issues and future challenges Routledge New York & London.

  • Cholewinski R 2002 ‘Family reunification and conditions placed on family members: dismantling a fundamental human right’ European Journal of Migration and Law vol. 4 no. 3 pp. 271-290.

  • Council of the European Union 2003 Council Directive No. 2003/86/ EC EUR-Lex Official Journal of the European Union L: 12-18.

  • Dean M 1999 Governmentality Sage London.

  • European Commission 2011 ‘Green Paper on the right to family reunification of third-country nationals living in the European Union (Directive2003/86/EC) COM (2011) 735 final’ Lex.europa.eu. Available from: [Retrieved 20.12.2012].

  • European Migration Network (EMN) 2008 ‘Family reunification: synthesis report’ Emn.intrasoft-intl.com. Available from: http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/Downloads/prepareShowFiles.do?directoryID=105 [Retrieved 12.12.2012].

  • European Migration Network (EMN) 2009 ‘Ad-hoc query on conducting other investigations (using a DNA test) in family reunification’. Emn.intrasoft-intl.com. Available from: . [Retrieved 12.12.2012].

  • European Migration Network (EMN) 2012 ‘Misuse of the right to family reunification: marriages of convenience and false declarations of parenthood’. Emn.intrasoft-intl.com. Available from: [Retrieved 12.12.2012].

  • Fassin D 2005 ‘Compassion and repression: the moral economy of immigration policies in France’ Cultural Anthropology vol. 20 no. 3 pp. 362-387.

  • Fassin D & d´Halluin E. 2005 ‘The truth from the body: medical certificates as ultimate evidence for asylum seekers’ AmericanAnthropologist vol. 107 no. 4 pp. 597-608.

  • Finnish Immigration Service 2008 ‘DNA analysis has unified a record number of immigrant families’. Migri.fi. Available from: . [Retrieved 15.12.2012].

  • Groenendijk K 2006 ‘Family reunification as a right under community law’ European Journal of Migration and Law vol. 3 no. 2 pp. 215-230.

  • Hautaniemi P 2007 ‘Diasporic authenticity: connecting genes and building families through DNA testing in Somali family reunification in Finland’ in From Mogadishu to Dixon: theSomali diaspora in a global context eds A. Kusow & S Björk Red Sea Press Trenton NJ pp. 119-234.

  • HaVL 1999a Pakolaisneuvonta Kuuleminen Eduskunnan hallintovaliokunnassa [26.10.1999].

  • HaVL 1999b Helsingin yliopisto oikeuslääketieteen laitos Jatkolausunto Eduskunnan hallintovaliokunnalle laiksi ulkomaalaislain muuttamisesta (HE 88/1999) [26.10.1999].

  • Heinemann T & Lemke T 2013 ‘Suspect families: DNA kinship testing in German immigration policy’ Sociology vol. 47 no. 4 810-826.

  • HE 88/1999 Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle laiksi ulkomaalaislain muuttamisesta.

  • HE 240/2009 Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle laiksi ulkomaalaislain muuttamisesta.

  • Heinemann T Naue U & Tapaninen A-M 2013 ‘Verifying the family? A comparison of DNA analysis for family reunification in three European countries (Austria Finland and Germany)’. EuropeanJournal of Migration and Law vol. 15 no. 2 pp. 183-202.

  • Helén I 2005 Genealogia kritiikkinä. Sosiologia vol. 42 no. 2 pp. 93-109.

  • Hindmarsh R & Prainsack B (eds) 2010 Genetic suspects: globalgovernance of DNA profiling and databasing Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • Holland E 2011 ‘Moving the virtual border to the cellular level: mandatory DNA testing and the U.S. Refugee Family Reunification Program’ California Law Review vol. 99 no. 6 pp. 1635-1681.

  • Honahan I 2009 ‘Reconsidering the claim to family reunification in migration’ Political Studies vol. 57 no. 4 pp. 768-787.

  • Hyusmans J 2000 ‘The European Union and the securitization of migration’ Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 38 no. 5 pp. 751-777.

  • Kokkarinen H n.d. Pakolaisten perheenyhdistäminen: DNAtutkimuksen käyttö perheenyhdistämistapauksissa. Unpublished Report Pakolaistoimisto Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö.

  • La Spina E 2012 ‘DNA testing for family reunification in Europe: an exceptional resource?’ Migraciones Internacionales vol. 6 no. 3 pp. 39-74.

  • Leitzinger A 2010 ‘Mansikkamaan vartijat: Muistelmia ulkomaalaishallinnosta eri vuosikymmeniltä’. Migri.fi . Available from: [Retrieved 8.1.2013].

  • Lepola O 2000 Ulkomaalaisesta suomenmaalaiseksi Finnish Literature Society Helsinki.

  • Lippert RK & Pyykkönen M 2012 ‘Contesting family in Finnish and Canadian immigration and refugee policy’ Nordic Journal ofMigration Research vol. 2 no. 1 pp. 45-56.

  • Lynch M Cole SA McNally R & Jordan K 2008 Truth machine: thecontentious history of DNA fingerprinting University of Chicago Press Chicago IL.

  • Maahanmuuttovirasto 2013 ‘Tilastoliite 2012’ Innocorp.fi. Available from: [Retrieved 20.4.2013].

  • M’Charek A 2005 The human genome diversity project: anethnography of scientific practice Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • Middleton T 2011 ‘Right to family reunion: the dynamics between EU law and national policy change MPG briefings for Green Paper on Family Reunion # 2’. Migpolgroup.org. Available from: . [Retrieved 12.12.2012].

  • Murdock TR 2008 ‘Whose child is this? Genetic analysis and family reunification immigration in France’ Vanderbilt Journal ofTransnational Law vol. 41 no. 5 pp. 1503-1534.

  • OM 1999 Oikeusministeriön lausunto sisäasiainministeriölle luonnoksesta hallituksen esityksestä ulkomaalaislain muuttamisesta 6.8.1999.

  • Pascouau Y 2011 Conditions for family reunification under strain. Acomparative study in nine EU member states European Policy Centre Bruxelles.

  • Ruffer G 2011 ‘Pushed beyond recognition? The liberality of family reunification policies in the EU’ Journal of Ethnic and MigrationStudies vol. 37 no. 6 pp. 935-951.

  • Säädöskokoelma (SDK) 378/1991 Ulkomaalaislaki.

  • Säädöskokoelma (SDK) 731/1999 Suomen perustuslaki.

  • Säädöskokoelma (SDK) 114/2000 Laki ulkomaalaislain muuttamisesta. Säädöskokoelma (SDK) 301/2004 Ulkomaalaislaki.

  • Säädöskokoelma (SDK) 549/2010 Laki ulkomaalaislain muuttamisesta.

  • Swedish Migration Board 2012 ‘For persons from Somalia with children under the age of 18’. Migrationsverket. se. Available from: [Retrieved 20 April 2013].

  • Taitz J Weekers JEM & Mosca DT 2002 ‘The last resort: exploring the use of DNA testing for family reunification’ Health andHuman Rights vol. 6 no. 1 pp. 20-32.

  • Ulkomaalaisvirasto (UVI) 2001 Ulkomaalaisviraston vuosikertomus 2000 Ulkomaalaisvirasto Helsinki.

  • Ulkomaalaisvaltuutettu (UVT) 1996a Toimintakertomus 1995 Ulkomaalaisvaltuutetun toimisto Helsinki.

  • Ulkomaalaisvaltuutettu (UVT) 1996b DNA-testauksen käyttömahdollisuudet Suomessa asuvien somalien sekä heidän Etiopiassa ja Keniassa olevien lähiomaistensa perheenyhdistämisessä Unpublished Report 5.7.1996.

  • Ulkomaalaisvaltuutettu (UVT) 1997 Toimintakertomus 1996 Ulkomaalaisvaltuutetun toimisto Helsinki.

  • Van der Ploeg I 1999 ‘The illegal body: “Eurodac” and the politics of biometric identification’ Ethics and Information Technology vol. 1 no. 4 pp. 295-302.

  • Villiers JD 2010 ‘Brave new world: the use and potential misuse of DNA technology in immigration law’ Boston College Third WorldLaw Journal vol. 30 no. 2 pp. 239-271.

  • Weiss MG 2011 ‘Strange DNA: the rise of DNA analysis for family reunification and its ethical implications’ Genomics Society andPolitics vol. 7 pp. 1-19. 161

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 684 531 5
PDF Downloads 96 70 1