The Marriage Route to Migration: of border artistes, transnational matchmaking and imported spouses
In preindustrial society, marriage was part of the family economy and as such a major instrument for building alliances to stabilise or improve status and wealth. It was only in the 18th and 19th centuries, and in Western societies, that romantic love became the normative foundation of marriage. Yet in other parts of the world marriage patterns continue to follow a different script. Moreover, as a result of present-day globalisation and migration, the instrumental value of marriage is spreading again and gaining new importance. Two trends are playing a major role here. On the one hand, as economic and political conditions in many regions of the world deteriorate, many people build their hopes on migration. On the other hand, Western countries try to limit migration by setting up very restrictive rules, with family unification becoming the last chance for entry. In response, young men and women in many parts of the world are redirecting their wishes and ambitions by placing their hopes in marriage, or more specifically, on marriage in accordance with migration rules. Here the first imperative is that the candidate must be a native of the West or a legal resident there.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Appadurai A 1991 ‘Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology’ in Recapturing anthropology: working in the present ed. RG Fox School of American Research Press Santa Fe pp. 191-210.
Ballard R 1990 ‘Migration and kinship: the differential effect of marriage rules on the processes of Punjabi migration to Britain’ in South Asians overseas: migration and ethnicity eds C Clarke C Peach & St. Vertovec Cambridge University Press Cambridge pp. 219-249.
Ballard R 2008 ‘Inside and outside: contrasting perspectives on the dynamics of kinship and marriage in contemporary South Asian transnational networks’ in The family in question: immigrant and ethnic minorities in multicultural Europe ed. G Ralph Amsterdam University Press Amsterdam pp. 37-70.
Beck U 2006 The cosmopolitan vision Polity Press Cambridge. Original German edition 2004 Der kosmopolitische Blick Suhrkamp Frankfurt.
Beck-Gernsheim E 2006 ‘Turkish brides: a look at the immigration debate in Germany’ in Migration Citizenship Ethnos eds YM Bodemann & G. Yurdakul Palgrave Macmillan New York pp. 185-194.
Beck-Gernsheim E 2007 Türkische Bräute und andere Opfergeschichten in Wir und die Anderen: Über Kopftuch Zwangsheirat und andere Mißverständnisse Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim Suhrkamp Frankfurt pp. 74-83.
Bledsoe CH 2004 ‘Reproduction at the margins: migration and legitimacy in the New Europe’ Demographic Research Special Collection vol. 3 no. 4 pp. 87-116.
Böcker A 1994 ‘Chain migration over legally closed borders: settled migrants as bridgeheads and gatekeepers’ The Netherlands' Journal of Social Sciences vol. 30 pp. 87-106.
Fleischer A 2007 ‘Family obligations and migration: the role of kinship in Cameroon’ Demographic Research vol. 16 article 13 pp. 413-440.
Jensen A-M 2008 ‘Thai women in the Arctic North’. Paper presented at the conference ‘Gender at the interface of the Global and the Local’ November 4-7 Kunming China.
Kalpagam U 2008 ‘America Varan marriages among Tamil brahmins: preferences strategies and outcomes’ in Marriage migration and gender eds R Palwirala & P Uberoi Sage London pp. 98-124.
Kelek N 2005 Die fremde Braut: Ein Bericht aus dem Inneren des türkischen Lebens in Deutschland. Kiepenheur & Witsch Köln.
Kofman E 2004 ‘Family-related migration: a critical review of European studies’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies vol. 30 no. 2 243-262.
Lash S & Urry J 2007 Globale Kulturindustrie Suhrkamp Frankfurt.
Lauser A 2004 ‘Ein guter Mann ist harte Arbeit’: Eine ethnographische Studie zu philippinischen Heiratsmigrantinnen Transcript Bielefeld.
Lu MC-w 2008 ‘Commercially arranged marriage migration: case studies of cross-border marriages in Taiwan’ in Marriage migration and gender eds R Palwirala & P Uberoi Sage London pp. 125-151.
Nazario S 2004 Enrique's journey: the story of a boy's dangerous odyssey to reunite with his mother Random House New York.
Newsletter Migration und Bevölkerung 2008 ‘Familiennachzug: Ehepartner scheitern am Sprachtest’ no. 10 December.
Onishi N 2007 ‘Also globalized: Asia's marriage market’ International Herald Tribune February 2.
Palriwala R & Uberoi P 2008 ‘Exploring the links: gender issues in marriage and migration’ in Marriage migration and gender eds R Palwirala & P Uberoi Sage London pp. 23-62.
Schiller NG Basch L & Blanc-Szanton C 1999 ‘Transnationalism: a new analytic framework for understanding migration’ in Migration Diasporas and Transnationalism eds S Vertovec & R Cohen Elgar Reference Collection Cheltenham/Northampton pp. 1-49.
Scott JC 1990 Domination and the arts of resistance Yale University Press Yale CT.
Shaw A 2001 ‘Kinship cultural preference and immigration: consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute vol. 7 pp. 315-334.
Shaw A 2004 ‘Immigrant families in the UK’ in The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families eds J Scott J Treas & M Richards Blackwell Malden MA pp. 270-285.
Shim Y-H 2008 ‘Transnational marriages in Korea: trends issues and adaption process’ Gender and Society vol. 65 no. 7 pp. 45-90.
Terkessidis M & Karakasoglu Y 2006 Gerechtigkeit für die Muslime! Die Zeit no. 6 February 1.
UNFPA 2006 Passage to hope: women and international migration. State of World Population.
Walt V 2008 ‘Field of dreams’ Time June 30 pp. 42-49.
Yurdakul G 2009 From guest workers into Muslims: the transformation of Turkish immigrant associations in Germany Cambridge Scholars Publishing Newcastle.