Inter-Municipal Cooperation in the Czech Republic: A Public Finance Perspective

Open access


Inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) in the Czech Republic is common and flexible and is generally viewed as a means to reduce problems related to the highly fragmented local government structure. The paper utilizes financial and accounting data of public entities to evaluate the character and magnitude of inter-municipal cooperation in the Czech Republic. It concludes that the extent of public services provided based on the service contracts or through institutionalized forms of IMC is quite limited and that the majority of the IMC is somewhat informal and soft , e.g. exchange of experience and ad-hoc projects.

Bel, Germa and Mildred E. Warner. 2016. “Factors Explaining Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Service Delivery: A Meta-Regression Analysis.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 19(2), 91 - 115.

Czech Statistical Office. 2017. Registr ekonomickych subjektů. [Registry of Economic Subjects]. Requested query, 15 May 2017.

Czech Statistical Office. 2018. “Number of Inhabitants in Municipalities.” Available at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Davey, Keneth. 2004. “Local Government Size, Structures, and Competencies in the European Context.” In Milhaly Kopanyi, Deborah Wetzel and Samir El

Daher (eds). Intergovernmental Finance in Hungary: A Decade of Experience 1990 - 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank, 79 - 92.

Dowding, Keith and Richard C. Feiock. 2012. “Intralocal Competition and Cooperation.” In Peter John, Karen Mossberger and Susan E. Clarke (eds). Th e Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 29 - 50.

Feiock, Richard C. 2007. “Rational Choice and Regional Governance.” Journal of Urban Aff airs 29(1), 47 - 63.

Galvasova, Iva et al. 2007. Spolupráce obcí jako faktor rozvoje [Municipal cooperation as a factor of development]. Brno: Georgetown. Available at (last accessed 31 May 2017).

Hemmings, Philip. 2006. “Improving Public-Spending Efficiency in Czech Regions and Municipalities.” Economic Department Working Paper 499. Paris: OECD.

Hertzog, Robert. 2010. “Intermunicipal Cooperation: A Viable Alternative to Territorial Amalgamation ?” In Swianiewicz, P. (ed.). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: LGI - Open Society Institute, 289 - 312. Avaliable at (last accessed 31 May 2017).

Hulst, Rudie and Andre van Montfort. 2007. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe (Vol. 238). Dordrecht: Springer.

Hulst, Rudie and Andre van Montfort. 2011. “Institutional Features of Inter-Municipal Cooperation: Cooperative Arrangements and their National Contexts.” Public Policy and Administration 27(2), 121 - 144.

Jetmar, Marek et al. 2015. Meziobecní spolupráce: Inspirativní cesta, jak zlepšit služby veřejnosti [Intermunicipal cooperation: An inspirative way, how to improve public services]. Praha: Svaz měst a obci Česke republiky. Available at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Ježek, Jiři. 2016. “Konsolidace obecni struktury v Česke republice: Mezi slučovanim a meziobecni spolupraci [Consolidation of municipal structure in the Czech Republic: Between amalgamation and inrte-rmunicipal cooperation]. Business Trends 6(3), 73 - 83.

Ježek, Jiři et al. 2015. Spolupráce obcí a měst: České a evropské přístupy ke slučování obcí a meziobecní spolupráci [Cooperation of vilage and towns: Czech and European approaches to municipal amalgamation and intermunicipal cooperation] Plzeň: Zapadočeska univerzita. Avaliable at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Lewis, Christine, and Falilou Fall. 2017. “Enhancing Public Sector Effi ciency and Effectiveness in the Czech Republic.” OECD Economics Department Working Paper 1363. Available at (last accessed 31 May 2017).

Lockwood, Ben. 2005. “Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Economy Perspective.” Warwick Economic Research Paper 721.

Ministry of Finance. 2014. Veřejné společnosti [Public companies]. Avaliable at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Ministry of Finance. 2018a. Monitor. Avaliable at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Ministry of Finance. 2018b. Přezkoumání hospodaření [Municipal audit] Avaliable at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Oates, Wallace E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37(3), 1120 - 1149.

Obec a finance. 2016. “Žadne slučovani ! Jdeme cestou spoluprace obci” [No amalgamation! We are going through the inter-municipal cooperation]. Obec a finance 5 / 2016. Available at (last accessed 31 May 2017).

Sedmihradska, Lucie and Lucie Kabelova. 2018. “Fragmentation of Czech Local Government and Territorial Public Administration Structures.” In Proceedings of the 26th NISPAcee Annual Conference 2018. CD-rom. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

Soukopova, Jana and Daniel Klimovsky. 2016. “Local Governments and Local Waste Management in the Czech Republic: Producers or Providers ?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 9(2), 217 - 237.

Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2010. “If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution ? An East European Perspective.” Local Government Studies 36(2), 183 - 203.

Union of Towns and Municipalities of the Czech Republic. 2014. Analýzy DSO [Analyses of VAM]. Available at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Union of Towns and Municipalities of the Czech Republic. 2018a. Odůvodnění potřebnosti projektu “Podpora meziobecní spolupráce” [Need assessment of the project “Support of inter-municipal cooperation”]. Available at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Union of Towns and Municipalities of the Czech Republic. 2018b. Centra společných služeb obcí [Centers of joint services]. Available at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Vajdova, Zdenka et al. 2006. “Autonomie a spoluprace: důsledky ustaveni obecniho zřizeni v roce 1990” [Autonomy and cooperation: eff ects of the founding of municipal self-government in 1990]. Sociologické studie 2. Available at (last accessed 25 June 2018).

Vedral, Josef et al. 2008. Zákon o obcích (obecní zřízení): komentář [Law on municipalities: commentary]. Praha: C. H. Beck.

Vrabkova, Iveta and Pavel Šaradin. 2017. “Th e Technical Effi ciency of Local Action Groups: A Czech Republic Case Study.” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 65(3), 1065 - 1074.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.234
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.285


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 119 119 31
PDF Downloads 82 82 25