The article analyses changes in the reform agendas of the Lithuanian government in the period 2004 – 2017. Instead of exploring the systemic and formal agendas of administrative reforms based on government strategies and programmes, it focuses on the institutional and actual agendas of Lithuanian authorities using a set of 20 reform initiatives. In addition to the analysis of the institutional context, we also assess a coupling logic and the exercise of political or bureaucratic entrepreneurship during reform policy making. The article finds that budgetary constraints and the reform policy priorities of the Lithuanian governments explain the ambitious agendas of administrative reforms during the 2008 – 2012 government and, to a lesser extent, during the 2016 – 2020 government. The political logic of coupling and political entrepreneurship dominated the flow of the reform process when these governments were in office, producing the top-down approach to reform policy making. In contrast, the 2004 – 2006, 2006 – 2008 and 2012 – 2016 governments relied strongly on a policy-centred logic of coupling together with bureaucratic entrepreneurship, which resulted in the bottom-up approach to administrative reforms in the country.
Ackrill, R., A. Kay and N. Zahariadis. 2013. “Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 20(6), 871 – 887.
Cairney, P. and M. D. Jones. 2016. “Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory ?” The Policy Studies Journal 44(1), 37 – 58.
Dan, S. and C. Pollitt. 2014. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17(9), 1305 – 1332.
European Commission. 2017a. Quality of Public Administration: A Toolbox for Practitioners. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. 2017b. “ESF Support to Administrative Modernisation.” Background paper for discussion in the ESF Technical Working Group, April.
Howlett, M., A. McConnell and A. Perl. 2015. “Streams and Stages: Reconciling Kingdon and Policy Process Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 54, 419 – 434.
Jones, B. and F. Baumgartner. 2012. “From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing.” The Policy Studies Journal 40(1), 1 – 20.
Jones, M. D., H. L. Peterson, J. J. Pierce, N. Herweg, A. Bernal, H. L. Raney and N. Zahariadis. 2016. “A River Runs Through It: A Multiple Streams Meta-Review.” The Policy Studies Journal 44(1), 13 – 36.
Kickert, W., T. Randma-Liiv and R. Savi. 2015. “Politics of Fiscal Consolidation in Europe: A Comparative Analysis.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81, 562 – 584.
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Nakrošis, V., R. Vilpišauskas and V. Kuokštis. 2015. “Fiscal Consolidation and Structural Reforms in Lithuania in the Period 2008 – 2012: From Grand Ambitions to Hectic Firefighting.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(3), 522 – 540.
OECD. 2015a. Annex to “The Public Governance Review Lithuania – Fostering Open and Inclusive Policy Making Key Findings and Recommendations.” Paris, OECD Conference Centre.
Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pump, B. 2011. “Beyond Metaphors: New Research on Agendas in the Policy Process.” The Policy Studies Journal 39 (S1), 1 – 12.
Rauleckas, R., V. Nakrošis, R. Šnapštienė and L. Šarkutė. 2016. “The Impact of Public Administration Reforms in Lithuania: Systemic Managerial Changes and Persisting Organizational Differences.” In G. Hammerschmid, S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews and P. Bezes (eds.) Public Administration Reforms in Europe. 1st edn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 105 – 116.