Public administration (PA) as a discipline and public governance as a closely related concept have been developing constantly and rather rapidly in recent years. A particularly lively progress is characteristic of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), owing to its post-communist legacy and subsequent transition. This paper outlines the mainstream topics of PA development within The NISPAcee Journal, which covers the CEE region and beyond. The principal objective of the paper is to systematically and quantitatively codify a series of text documents that comprises 142 articles published between 2008 and 2016 in The NISPAcee Journal, in order to identify the characteristics of PA development in the region. The paper investigates three hypotheses: first, whether the quality of the articles changed throughout 2008 – 2016; second, whether The NISPAcee Journal attests a multidisciplinary orientation in terms of scientific contributions from different disciplines, and third, whether The NISPAcee Journal reflects the West-East knowledge transfer among PA academia. The three hypotheses were tested against seven analytical dimensions. The research findings reveal that governance is the prevailing cognitive paradigmatic approach of The NISPAcee Journal. Europeanisation is the common thread of almost all articles, with a particular emphasis on the ideological elements of the Neo-Weberian and New Public Management doctrines. Qualitative methodology is still the prevailing research method, and the occurrence of mixed methodology is rare. The topical orientation of the analysed manuscripts is very diverse. A considerable emphasis is placed on the analysis and development of PA as a discipline. The majority of researchers originate from CEE countries and focus their studies on Eastern Europe, the Balkans, and the Caucasus. Scientific partnership between the Eastern and the Western academic worlds is still scarce. Given the low level of exchange of best academic practices between Western and Eastern Europe, research results indicate the need for an increased internationalisation of the NISPAcee Journal and a more holistic approach to tackle the future challenges of global and regional PA and public governance more adequately.
Babbie, Earl R. 2001. The Practice of Social Research. Stamford, CT: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Berelson, Bernard. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
Bevir, Mark (ed.). 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Bingham, Richard D. and William M. Bowen. 1994. “Mainstream Public Administration Over Time: A Topical Content Analysis of the Public Administration Review.” Public Administration Review 54(2), 204 – 208.
Cini, Michelle. 2007. European Union Politics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drechsler, Wolfgang. 2005. “The Re-Emergence of Weberian Public Administration after the Fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European Perspective.” Handuskultuur 6, 94 – 108.
Erlandson, David A., Edward L. Harris, Barbara L. Skipper and Steven D. Allen. 1993. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hofmann, Herwig C. H. 2008. “Mapping the European Administrative Space.” West European Politics 31(4), 662 – 676.
Koprić, Ivan, Gordana Marčetić, Anamarija Musa, Vedran Đulabić and Goranka Lalić Novak. 2014. Upravna znanost – javna uprava u suvremenom europskom kontekstu [Administrative Science – Public Administration in contemporary European Context]. Zagreb: Institute of Public Administration.
Kovač, Polonca and Mantas Bileišis (eds). 2017. Public Administration Reforms in Eastern European Union Member States, Post Accession Convergence and Divergence. Ljubljana, Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, Faculty of Administration.
Kovač, Polonca and Tina Jukić. 2016. “Development of Public Administration and its Research in Slovenia through the Lenses of Content Analysis of the International Public Administration Review.” International Public Administration Review 14(1), 75 – 114.
Kovač, Polonca and Tina Jukić. 2017. “Declarations and Reality of Europeanized Public Administration in Eastern Europe: Journals Content Analysis in Slovenia and Croatia.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 50E, 127 – 145.
Kuhlmann, Sabine and Helmut Wollmann (eds). 2014. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Lan, Zhiyong and Kathleen K. Anders. 2000. “A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test.” Administration & Society 32(2), 138 – 165.
Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Econ G. Guba. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Menon, Rajan, Yuri E. Fedorov and Ghia Nodia (eds). 2015. Russia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia: The 21st Central Security Environment. New York: Routledge.
Ongaro, Edoardo and Sandra Van Thiel (eds.). 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Peci, Alketa and Marcelo Fornazin. 2017. “The Knowledge-Building Process of Public Administration Research: A Comparative Perspective between Brazil and North American Contexts.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 83, 99 – 119.
Perry, James L. and Kenneth L. Kraemer. 1984. “Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review, 1975 – 1984.” Public Administration Review 46(3), 215 – 226.
Peters, B. Guy (ed.). 2008. Mixes, Matches and Mistakes: New Public Management in Russia and the FSU. Budapest: LGI.
Raadschelders, Jos C. N. 2011. Public Administration: The Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raadschelders, Jos C. N. and Eran Vigoda-Gadot. 2015. Global Dimensions of Public Administration and Governance: A Comparative Voyage. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Randma-Liiv, Tiina and Wolfgang Drechsler. 2017. “Three Decades, Four Phases: Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989 – 2017.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 30(6 – 7), 595 – 605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0175.
Shapiro, Gilbert and John Markoff. 1997. “A Matter of Definition.” In Carl W. Roberts (ed.). Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Text and Transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 9 – 34.