Towards a Managerial Public Service Bargain: The Estonian Civil Service Reform

Open access


The aim of this article is to explore and explain the 2012 civil service reform in Estonia. The study builds on the concept of public service bargain, which facilitates the operationalization of changes in the civil service system. Although public service bargain has attracted a lot of interest of public administration scholars, it has not been previously applied in the civil service research in Central and Eastern Europe. The theoretical part synthesizes previous literature on typologies of public service bargain, thus elaborating an analytical framework for the empirical study. The empirical study addresses the following research question: did the civil service reform change the public service bargain in Estonia and if so, how ? The empirical research was carried out by relying on desk research, secondary literature on Estonian administrative reforms and participant observation. The study builds partly on the materials collected for the EUPACK case study on Estonia. The analysis shows that the civil service reform brought along changes in all three components of public service bargain: reward, competency and loyalty, although the agency-type bargain was retained. The shift towards the managerial public service bargain is evidenced in the greater emphasis on flexibility in employment relations, the use of fixed-term contracts, increased private-sector-style practices at all levels of the civil service, an emphasis on performance management, and the reduction of job security. Despite the widespread criticism of NPM, the Estonian civil service reform presents a “textbook case” of managerial NPM-oriented reform. It is argued that substantially diminished rewards may contribute to a vicious circle of temporary civil servants, including problems with recruiting new officials and a further increase in their turnover, ultimately leading to a “temporary state”. The loyalty of civil servants may in turn shift towards instrumental, short-term and easily influenced or changing loyalty, thus challenging the fundamental values of democratic governance.

Althaus, Catherine and Thea Vakil. 2013. “Political Transitions: Opportunities to Renegotiate the Public Service Bargain.” Canadian Public Administration / Administration Publique du Canada 56(3), 478 – 490.

Askim, Jostein and Tobias Bach. 2017. “Administrative Reforms, Politicization and the Selection of Heads of State Agencies in Norway.” Paper presented at the ECPR conference, 6 – 9 September, in Oslo, Norway.

Bezes, Philippe and Martin Lodge. 2015. “Civil Service Reforms, Public Service Bargains and Dynamics of Institutional Change.” In Frits Van der Meer, Jos C. N. Raadschelders, and Theo A. J. Toonen (eds). Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century. 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 136 – 161.

Burns, John P., Li Wei and B. Guy Peters. 2013. “Changing Governance Structures and the Evolution of Public Service Bargains in Hong Kong.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(1), 131 – 148.

Dimitrova, Antoaneta. 2002. “Enlargement, Institution-Building, and the EU’s Administrative Capacity Requirement.” West European Politics 25(4), 171 – 190.

Hondeghem, Annie and Karolien Van Dorpe. 2012. “Performance Management Systems for Senior Civil Servants: How Strong is the Managerial Public Service Bargain ?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(1), 9 – 27.

Hood, Christopher. 2000. “Paradoxes of Public-Sector Managerialism, Old Public Management and Public Service Bargains.” International Public Management Journal 3, 1 – 22.

Hood, Christopher. 2001. “Public Service Bargains and Public Service Reform.” In B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds). Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform. London and New York: Routledge, 13 – 23.

Hood, Christopher. 2002. “Control, Bargains, and Cheating: The Politics of Public Service Reform.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12(3), 309 – 332.

Hood, Christopher and Martin Lodge. 2006. The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty – and Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Järvalt, Jane and Tiina Randma-Liiv. 2010. “Public Sector HRM: The Case of no Central Human Resource Strategy.” Baltic Journal of Management 5(2), 242 – 256.

Järvalt, Jane and Tiina Randma-Liiv. 2012. “Starting from Scratch: Rewards of High Public Office in Estonia.” In Marleen Brans, and B. Guy Peters. Rewards for High Public Office in Europe and North America. London: Routledge, 190 – 208.

Lægreid, Per and Lois Recascino Wise. 2015. “Transitions in Civil Service Systems: Robustness and Flexibility in Human Resource Management.” In Frits Van der Meer, Jos C. N. Raadschelders and Theo A. J. Toonen (eds). Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century. 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 203 – 222.

Lodge, Martin and Derek Gill. 2011. “Toward a New Era of Administrative Reform ? The Myth of Post-NPM in New Zealand.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24(1), 141 – 166.

Lodge, Martin and Christopher Hood. 2012. “Into an Age of Multiple Austerities ? Public Management and Public Service Bargains across OECD Countries.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 25(1), 79 – 101.

Meyer, Renate E. and Gerhard Hammerschmid. 2010. “The Degree of Decentralization and Individual Decision Making in Central Government Human Resource Management: A European Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration 88(2), 455 – 478.

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after Accession.” Governance 24(2), 231 – 260.

Ministry of Finance. 2015. Civil Service Yearbook 2014. Tallinn: Ministry of Finance.

Ministry of Finance. 2016. Civil Service Yearbook 2015. Tallinn: Ministry of Finance.

Nemec, Juraj. 2010. “New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What Do we Know and where Do we Go ?” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 3(1), 31 – 52.

Pesti, Cerlin and Tiina Randma-Liiv. 2017. Report on Public Administration Reform Trends and Reform Dynamics in Estonia. A report prepared within the EC’s EUPACK project.

Peters, B. Guy. 2010. The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. 6th edn. London: Routledge.

Randma-Liiv, Tiina and Wolfgang Drechsler. 2017. “Three Decades, Four Phases: Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989 – 2017.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 30(6 – 7), 595 – 605.

Randma-Liiv, Tiina, Annika Uudelepp and Külli Sarapuu. 2015. “From Network to Hierarchy: the Evolution of the Estonian Senior Civil Service Development System.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(2), 373 – 391.

Rouban, Luc. 2012. “Politicization of the Civil Service.” In B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds). Handbook of Public Administration. 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications, 380 – 391.

Salomonsen, Heidi Houlberg and Tim Knudsen. 2011. “Changes in Public Service Bargains: Ministers and Civil Servants in Denmark.” Public Administration 89(3), 1015 – 1035.

Savi, Riin and Tiina Randma-Liiv. 2016. “Public Sector Reform in Estonia: The Abundance of Piecemeal Initiatives.” In Gerhard Hammerschmid, Steven Van de Walle, Rhys Andrews and Philippe Bezes (eds). Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 85 – 95.

Steen, Trui and Frits van der Meer. 2011. “Public Service Bargains in Dutch Top Civil Service.” Public Policy and Administration 26(2), 209 – 232.

Tammekänd, Katri. 2004. “Tippametnike politiseerumine: kas ohu märk või loomulik areng ?” [Politicization of Senior Civil Servants: A Sign of Danger or Natural Development ?]. Riigikogu Toimetised 9, 117 – 122.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.234
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.285


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 279 279 42
PDF Downloads 233 233 34