The public has put increased pressure on organizations providing public services to demonstrate the most productive use of resources, with due regard for value received. Education is no exception. This study focus on the presentation and evaluation of public organizations (public grammar schools in our case) in education on the basis of their economy, efficiency and effectiveness as one of the indicators of performance assessment. The methodology of Value For Money presented in this study can provide useful information about the situation of education for public forces and for public grammar schools themselves. Also, this methodology may help to gain a deeper insight into strengths of individual schools, as well as in which they can improve. A limitation of the concept of VFM is that performance evaluation is possible only between homogeneous services. The originality and value of the study are reflected in its focus on such topics as monitoring and measuring of performance for public service organizations (i.e., education services). It also provides a tool for districts and individual schools to gain information using indicators employed here for identifying and solving the performance problems that occur in education system of Slovakia.
Ariste, R. & Di Matteo, L. (2017). Value for money: An evaluation of health spending in Canada. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 17(3), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-016-9204-6
Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. (2004). Managing performance: Performance management in action. 2nd. ed. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Armstrong, M. (2015). Armstrong’s handbook of performance measurement – An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.
Bacal, R. (1999). Performance management. A briefcase book. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S. & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(5), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579710167230
Brignal, S. & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the “new public sector”. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136
Dransfield, R. (2000). Human resource management. Heinemann: Oxford.
Emery, Y., Wyser, C., Martin, N. & Sanchez, J. (2008). Swiss public servants’ perceptions of performance in a fast-changing environment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(2), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308089906
Hollander, M. J., Kadlec, H., Hamdi, R. & Tessaro, A. (2009). Increasing value for money in the Canadian healthcare system: New findings on the contribution of primary care services. Healthcare Quarterly, 12(4), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2013.21050
Ittner, C. D. & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81, 88-95.
Jackson, P. (2012). Value for money and international development: Deconstructing myths to promote a more constructive discussion. OECD: Development Co-operation Directorate.
Johnston, R. & Pongatichat, P. (2008). Managing the tension between performance measurement and strategy: Coping strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(10), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810903104
Kalubanga, M. & Kakwezi, P. (2013). Value for money auditing and audit evidence from a procurement perspective: A conceptual paper. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 2(5), 115-124.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 167-176.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy focused organization. How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environmnet. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Keraudren, P. & Mierlo, H. (1997). Teórie Reformy Verejnej Správy a ich Praktické Uplatnenie. Reforma Verejnej Správy. Porovnanie Skúsenosti Východu a Západu. (eds. Coombes, Verheijen, T.). Bratislava: NISPAcce.
Lorenzoni, L., Murtin, F., Springare, L. S., Auraaen, A. & Daniel, F. (2018). Which policies increase value for money in health care? OECD Health Working Paper, 104, 71 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/18152015
Mante, B. & O’Brien, G. (2002). Efficiency measurement of Australian public sector organisations: The case of state secondary schools in Victoria. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(3), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210427181
Mawani, A. (2011). Can We Get Better for Less: Value for Money in Canadian Health Care. ON: Certified General Accountants Association of Canada, Ottawa.
Nemec, J. & Wright, G. (1997). Verejné Financie: Teoretické a Praktické Aspekty Verejných Financií v Procese Transformácie Krajín Strednej Európy. Bratislava: NISPACee.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui045
Propper, C. & Wilson, D. (2003). The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 250-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250
Radnor, Z. & McGuire, M. (2004). Performance management in the public sector: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400410523783
Severens, J. (2003). Value for money of changing healthcare services? Economic evaluation of quality improvement. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 12(5), 366-371. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.5.366
Stankovičová, I. & Vojtková, M. (2007). Viacrozmerné statistické metódy s aplikáciami. Bratislava: Iura Edition.
Stevers, B. P. & Joyce, T. (2000). Building a balanced performance management ystem – SAM. Advanced Management Journal, 8, 22-28.
Šebo, J. & Vaceková, G. (2011). Dynamika výkonnosti neziskových organizácií poskytujúcich všeobecne prospešné služby na slovensku. Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Bela, Ekonomická fakulta.
Tuffaha, H. W., Aitken, J., Chambers, S. & Scuffham, P. A. (2019). A framework to prioritise health research proposals for funding: Integrating value for money. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 17(6), 761-770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00495-2
Veber, J. et al. (2007). Řízení jakosti a ochrana spotřebitele. Prague: Grada Publishing.
Verbeeten, F. H. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863996
West, D. & Blackmann, D. (2015). Performance anagement in the public service: Where has it got to? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12130
Wouters, M. & Sportel, M. (2005). The role of existing measures in developing and implementing performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(11), 1062-1082. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510626899
Young, T. K., Chatwood, S. & Marchildon, G. P. (2016). Healthcare in Canada’s North: Are We Getting Value for Money? Healthcare in Canada’s north: Are we getting value for money? Health Policy, 12(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2016.24776