Value for Money in Organizations Providing Public Education Services and How to Measure It

Jana Štrangfeldová 1  and Nikola Štefanišinová 2
  • 1 Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Slovakia
  • 2 Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Slovakia


The public has put increased pressure on organizations providing public services to demonstrate the most productive use of resources, with due regard for value received. Education is no exception. This study focus on the presentation and evaluation of public organizations (public grammar schools in our case) in education on the basis of their economy, efficiency and effectiveness as one of the indicators of performance assessment. The methodology of Value For Money presented in this study can provide useful information about the situation of education for public forces and for public grammar schools themselves. Also, this methodology may help to gain a deeper insight into strengths of individual schools, as well as in which they can improve. A limitation of the concept of VFM is that performance evaluation is possible only between homogeneous services. The originality and value of the study are reflected in its focus on such topics as monitoring and measuring of performance for public service organizations (i.e., education services). It also provides a tool for districts and individual schools to gain information using indicators employed here for identifying and solving the performance problems that occur in education system of Slovakia.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amaratunga, D. & Baldry, D. (2000). Assessment of facilities management performance in higher education properties. Facilities, 18(7/8), 293-301.

  • Ariste, R. & Di Matteo, L. (2017). Value for money: An evaluation of health spending in Canada. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 17(3), 289-310.

  • Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. (2004). Managing performance: Performance management in action. 2nd. ed. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

  • Armstrong, M. (2015). Armstrong’s handbook of performance measurement – An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.

  • Bacal, R. (1999). Performance management. A briefcase book. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Barnett, C., Barr J., Christie A., Duff B. & Hext, S. (2010). Measuring the impact and value for money of governance programmes. ITAD. Retrieved from

  • Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S. & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(5), 522–534.

  • Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97-122.

  • Bradley, S. & Durbin, B. (2013). Value for money in education. Educational Research, 55(2), 117-120.

  • Brignal, S. & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the “new public sector”. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281-306.

  • Coates, H. (2009). What’s the difference? A model for measuring the value added by higher education in Australia. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1), 5-5.

  • Coombes, D. & Verheijen, T. (1997). Public management reform: Comparative experiences from east and west. Brusel: European Commission.

  • Cavalluzzo, K. S. & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 243-267.

  • Department for International Development. (2011). DFID’s approach to value for money (VfM). DFID. Retrieved from

  • Dolton, P., Marcenaro Gutiérrez, O. & Still, A. (2014). The efficiency index: Which education systems deliver the best value for money? Project Report. London: GEMS Education Solutions. Retrieved from

  • Dransfield, R. (2000). Human resource management. Heinemann: Oxford.

  • Emery, Y., Wyser, C., Martin, N. & Sanchez, J. (2008). Swiss public servants’ perceptions of performance in a fast-changing environment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(2), 307-323.

  • Hollander, M. J., Kadlec, H., Hamdi, R. & Tessaro, A. (2009). Increasing value for money in the Canadian healthcare system: New findings on the contribution of primary care services. Healthcare Quarterly, 12(4), 32–44.

  • Hood, CH. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.

  • Garnett, H. M., Roos, G. & Pike, S. (2008). Repeatable assessment for determining value and enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in higher education. Paris: OECD.

  • Gillen, T. (2007). Performance management and appraisal. 2nd Edition. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

  • Gray, A. & Jenkins, B. (1995). From public administration to public management: Reassessing a revolution? Public Administration, 7(3), 75-99.

  • Ingram, H. & McDonnell, B. (1996). Effective performance management – The teamwork approach considered. Managing Service Quality, 6, 38-42.

  • Ittner, C. D. & Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81, 88-95.

  • Jackson, P. (2012). Value for money and international development: Deconstructing myths to promote a more constructive discussion. OECD: Development Co-operation Directorate.

  • Johnston, R. & Pongatichat, P. (2008). Managing the tension between performance measurement and strategy: Coping strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(10), 941-967.

  • Kalubanga, M. & Kakwezi, P. (2013). Value for money auditing and audit evidence from a procurement perspective: A conceptual paper. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 2(5), 115-124.

  • Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 167-176.

  • Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy focused organization. How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environmnet. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Keraudren, P. & Mierlo, H. (1997). Teórie Reformy Verejnej Správy a ich Praktické Uplatnenie. Reforma Verejnej Správy. Porovnanie Skúsenosti Východu a Západu. (eds. Coombes, Verheijen, T.). Bratislava: NISPAcce.

  • Kuwaiti, M. E. (2004). Performance measurement process: Definition and ownership. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(1), 55-78.

  • Lane, J. E. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge.

  • Leigh-Hunt, N., Cooper, D., Furber, A., Bevan, G. & Gray, M. (2018). Visualizing value for money in public health interventions. Journal of Public Health, 40(3), 405-412.

  • Lorenzoni, L., Murtin, F., Springare, L. S., Auraaen, A. & Daniel, F. (2018). Which policies increase value for money in health care? OECD Health Working Paper, 104, 71 p.

  • Mante, B. & O’Brien, G. (2002). Efficiency measurement of Australian public sector organisations: The case of state secondary schools in Victoria. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(3), 274-298.

  • Mawani, A. (2011). Can We Get Better for Less: Value for Money in Canadian Health Care. ON: Certified General Accountants Association of Canada, Ottawa.

  • McGrail, K., Zierler, A. & Ip, I. (2009). Getting what we pay for: The value for money challenge. Healthcare Quarterly, 9(4), 8–22.

  • Mikušová Meričková, B., Šebo, J. & Štrangfeldová, J. (2011). Základy Verejných Financií. Brno: Rašínova vysoká škola.

  • Neely, A. & Austin, R. (2002). Measuring performance: The operations perspective. In A. Neely (Ed.), Business Performance Measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nemec, J. & Wright, G. (1997). Verejné Financie: Teoretické a Praktické Aspekty Verejných Financií v Procese Transformácie Krajín Strednej Európy. Bratislava: NISPACee.

  • Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

  • Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25-44.

  • Propper, C. & Wilson, D. (2003). The use and usefulness of performance measures in the public sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 250-265.

  • Radnor, Z. & McGuire, M. (2004). Performance management in the public sector: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 245-260.

  • Severens, J. (2003). Value for money of changing healthcare services? Economic evaluation of quality improvement. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 12(5), 366-371.

  • Smith, P. (1993). Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector. British Journal of Management, 4, 135-151.

  • Smith, P. C. (2009). Measuring value for money in healthcare: Concepts and tools. Centre for Health Economics, University of York. Retrieved from

  • Stankovičová, I. & Vojtková, M. (2007). Viacrozmerné statistické metódy s aplikáciami. Bratislava: Iura Edition.

  • Stevers, B. P. & Joyce, T. (2000). Building a balanced performance management ystem – SAM. Advanced Management Journal, 8, 22-28.

  • Šebo, J. & Vaceková, G. (2011). Dynamika výkonnosti neziskových organizácií poskytujúcich všeobecne prospešné služby na slovensku. Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Bela, Ekonomická fakulta.

  • Tuffaha, H. W., Aitken, J., Chambers, S. & Scuffham, P. A. (2019). A framework to prioritise health research proposals for funding: Integrating value for money. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 17(6), 761-770.

  • Varma, A., Budhwar-Pawan, S. & Denisi, A. (2008). Performance management systems: A global perspective. Oxon: Routledge.

  • Veber, J. et al. (2007). Řízení jakosti a ochrana spotřebitele. Prague: Grada Publishing.

  • Verbeeten, F. H. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 427-454.

  • West, D. & Blackmann, D. (2015). Performance anagement in the public service: Where has it got to? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 73–81.

  • Wouters, M. & Sportel, M. (2005). The role of existing measures in developing and implementing performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(11), 1062-1082.

  • University of Cambridge. (2010). Value for money committee annual report to council. Retrieved from

  • Young, T. K., Chatwood, S. & Marchildon, G. P. (2016). Healthcare in Canada’s North: Are We Getting Value for Money? Healthcare in Canada’s north: Are we getting value for money? Health Policy, 12(1), 59-70.


Journal + Issues