This paper discusses the harmful tax practices of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and the fight of international organizations against them. We focus on the anti-tax base erosion and profit shifting project (anti-BEPS project) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), namely its 15 actions, which we present in the first part of the paper, using descriptive and analytical methods. In the second part, we use critical and synthetic methods to assess how the selected aspects of multinational business will be impacted with described actions. Our conclusions show that MNEs will have to adapt their business structures and plans according to new tax regulations, which will also lower their profit levels due to unavailability of established harmful tax structures for lowering their tax bases. At the same time, our results indicate that the legal approach in introducing new measures on the subject field, lead to legal uncertainty in tax matters. Due to the scope of analysed problems, it was impossible to introduce individual problems in depth; however, we provide readers with the general characteristics and goals of introduced actions that are necessary for understanding our evaluation of their impact on certain fields of international business. Our paper contributes to literature and practice, as it provides general insight into recent and important international tax law developments that enterprises will have to consider when doing business across borders.
Eagers, A., & Bennett, M. (2016). The impact of BEPS in M&A transactions. BEPS Is Broader Than Tax: Practical Business Implications of BEPS, 30–33.
Flynn, C., & Bates, S. (2016). The impact of BEPS on the digital economy. BEPS Is Broader Than Tax: Practical Business Implications of BEPS, 12-16.
Ginevra, G. (2017). The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive and the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan: Necessity and Adequacy of the Measures at EU level. Intertax, 45(2), 120-137.
Govind, S., & Zolles, S. (2018). Chapter 8 - The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. In M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schuch, & C. Staringer, Introduction to European Tax Law on Direct Taxation 5th edition (pp. 217-254). Vienna: Linde.
Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535—553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00164-2
Klink, H. (2016). Is the use of holding and finance companies “inappropriate”? BEPS is broader than tax: practical business implications of BEPS, 4-7.
Lee-Makiyama, H., & Verschelde, B. (2016). The Challenge of the Digital Economy/OECD BEPS: Reconciling Global Trade, Taxation Principles and the Digital Economy. The Challenge of the Digital Economy (Chapter 4), 55—68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43690-6_4
McBarnet, D. (1992). Legitimate rackets: Tax evasion, tax avoidance, and the boundaries of legality. Critical Criminology, 3(2), 56—74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02619290
Pinkernell, R. (2013). OECD-Aktionsplan gegen internationale Gewinnverlagerung und Aushöhlung der Bemessungsgrundlagen (BEPS-Projekt). Finanz-Rundschau Ertragsteuerrecht, 16, 737–776. https://doi.org/10.9785/ovs-fr-2013-737
Rust, A. (2015). Der BEPS Aktionspunkt 2 zur Neutralisierung der Effekte hybrider Gestaltungen und seine Vereinbarkeit mit den Diskriminierungsverboten der Doppelbesteuerungsabkommen und des AEUV. MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance 5, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47465-5_5