Anti-BEPS Measures and Their Impact on Business Performance of Multinational Enterprises


This paper discusses the harmful tax practices of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and the fight of international organizations against them. We focus on the anti-tax base erosion and profit shifting project (anti-BEPS project) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), namely its 15 actions, which we present in the first part of the paper, using descriptive and analytical methods. In the second part, we use critical and synthetic methods to assess how the selected aspects of multinational business will be impacted with described actions. Our conclusions show that MNEs will have to adapt their business structures and plans according to new tax regulations, which will also lower their profit levels due to unavailability of established harmful tax structures for lowering their tax bases. At the same time, our results indicate that the legal approach in introducing new measures on the subject field, lead to legal uncertainty in tax matters. Due to the scope of analysed problems, it was impossible to introduce individual problems in depth; however, we provide readers with the general characteristics and goals of introduced actions that are necessary for understanding our evaluation of their impact on certain fields of international business. Our paper contributes to literature and practice, as it provides general insight into recent and important international tax law developments that enterprises will have to consider when doing business across borders.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Burgers, I., & Mosquera, I. (2017). Corporate Taxation and BEPS: A Fair Slice for Developing Countries? Erasmus Law Review, 1(8), 29-47.

  • Cockfield, A. (2014, September 15). BEPS and Global Digital Taxation. Tax Notes International, 75(11), 933-940.

  • Cordewener, A. (2017). Anti-Abuse Measures in the Area of Direct Taxation: Towards Converging Standards under Treaty Freedoms and EU Directives? EC Tax Review, 2, 60-66.

  • Durst, M. (2014). Beyond BEPS: A Tax Policy Agenda for Developing Countries. Institute of Development Studies.

  • Eagers, A., & Bennett, M. (2016). The impact of BEPS in M&A transactions. BEPS Is Broader Than Tax: Practical Business Implications of BEPS, 30–33.

  • Flynn, C., & Bates, S. (2016). The impact of BEPS on the digital economy. BEPS Is Broader Than Tax: Practical Business Implications of BEPS, 12-16.

  • Ginevra, G. (2017). The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive and the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan: Necessity and Adequacy of the Measures at EU level. Intertax45(2), 120-137.

  • Govind, S., & Zolles, S. (2018). Chapter 8 - The Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. In M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schuch, & C. Staringer, Introduction to European Tax Law on Direct Taxation 5th edition (pp. 217-254). Vienna: Linde.

  • Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 535—553.

  • Klink, H. (2016). Is the use of holding and finance companies “inappropriate”? BEPS is broader than tax: practical business implications of BEPS, 4-7.

  • Lee-Makiyama, H., & Verschelde, B. (2016). The Challenge of the Digital Economy/OECD BEPS: Reconciling Global Trade, Taxation Principles and the Digital Economy. The Challenge of the Digital Economy (Chapter 4), 55—68.

  • McBarnet, D. (1992). Legitimate rackets: Tax evasion, tax avoidance, and the boundaries of legality. Critical Criminology, 3(2), 56—74.

  • OECD. (2016). Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments, Action 4 - 2016 Update. Retrieved from:;jsessionid=6cs_4smJB0jIXHz4fITLfBBl.ip-10-240-5-180

  • OECD. (2019). BEPS Actions. Retrieved from:

  • OECD. (2019a). Action 1 Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation. Retrieved from:

  • Pinkernell, R. (2013). OECD-Aktionsplan gegen internationale Gewinnverlagerung und Aushöhlung der Bemessungsgrundlagen (BEPS-Projekt). Finanz-Rundschau Ertragsteuerrecht16, 737–776.

  • Rust, A. (2015). Der BEPS Aktionspunkt 2 zur Neutralisierung der Effekte hybrider Gestaltungen und seine Vereinbarkeit mit den Diskriminierungsverboten der Doppelbesteuerungsabkommen und des AEUV. MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance 5, 89-108.

  • Sandmo, A. (2005). The Theory of Tax Evasion: A Retrospective View. National Tax Journal, LVIII(4), 643-663.

  • Schreiber, U. (2015). Investitionseffekte des BEPS Aktionsplans der OECD. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 67(1), 102—127.

  • Valente, P. (2017). BEPS Action 15: Release of Multilateral Instrument. Intertax, 45(3), 219-228.

  • Van Apeldoorn, L. (2016, September 6). BEPS, tax sovereignty and global justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 21(4), 478-499.


Journal + Issues