The Tax Burden CGE Analysis for Slovakia and Slovenia


In the paper, the static computable general equilibrium model for Slovakia and Slovenia is used for a tax burden analysis. There was considered simultaneous 1% increase in taxes on primary factors, on firms’ and government domestic and imported purchases, on import taxes, on output (or income) tax, on private domestic and imported consumption taxes and export subsidies. The direct tax burden as well as the allocative efficiency effects of a tax, the welfare effects and welfare decomposition of such change for both countries is analysed. The most sensitive sectors on tax rate changes is heavy manufacturing and processed food and the most distorting effect has the tax increase on private consumption tax. The government’s tax increase should generate return at least 105.75% of its costs in Slovakia and 101.92% in Slovenia, otherwise the welfare will decline.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E., McDougall, R., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2019). The GTAP data base: Version 10. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4(1), 1-27. doi:

  • Altig, D., Auerbach, A.J., Kotlikoff, L.J., Smetters, K.A., & Walliser, J. (2001). Simulating fundamental tax reform in the United Sates. American Economic Review, 91(3), 574–595.

  • Ballard, C.L., Shoven, J.B., & Whalley, J. (1985). General equilibrium computations of the marginal welfare costs of taxes in the United States. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 128–138.

  • Boyd, R. (1988). An economic model of direct and indirect effects of tax reform on agriculture (Technical Bulletin No. 1743). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

  • Browing, E. K., & Johnson, W. R. (1984). The trade-off between equality and efficiency. Journal of Political Economy, 92, 175–203.

  • Burfisher, M. (2016) Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carbone, J. C. and Smith K. V. (2008) Evaluating policy interventions with general equilibrium externalities. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1254-1274.

  • Cordano, A. L. V. and Balistreri, E. J. (2003) The marginal cost of public funds of mineral and energy taxes in Peru. Resources Policy, 35(4), 257-264.

  • Cutler, H. Shields, M. and Davies, S. (2018) Can State Tax Policy Increase Economic Activity and Reduce Inequality? Growth and Change, 49(1), 142-164.

  • Figari, F., Gandullia, L. and Lezzi, E. (2018) Marginal Cost of Public Funds: From the Theory to the Empirical Application for the Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Tax-Benefit Systems. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 18(4), 1682-1935.

  • Fullerton, D., Shoven, B. J. and Whalley, J. (1983) Replacing the U.S. Income Tax with a Progressive Consumption Tax. Journal of Public Economics, 20, 3-23.

  • Hanson, G., and Bertelsen. D. (1987) Tax Reform Impacts on Agricultural Production and Investment Decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 1013-1020.

  • Hansson, I. and Stuart, Ch. (1983) Taxation, Government Spending, and Labor Supply: A Diagrammatic Exposition. Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, 21, 584-587.

  • Hertel, T.W. and Tsigas, M.E. (1997) Structure of GTAP. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applicaations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hertel, T.W., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2016). Chapter 14: Behavioral parameters (Center for Global Trade Analysis). In Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

  • Horvath, M., Senaj, M., Siebertova, Z., Švarda, N., & Valachyová, J. (2019) The end of the flat tax experiment in Slovakia: An evaluation using behavioural microsimulation in a dynamic macroeconomic framework. Economic Modelling, 80, 171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.005.

  • Huff, K., & Hertel, T.W. (2001). Welfare changes in the GTAP model (GTAP Technical Paper No. 5). West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

  • McDougall, Robert (2001) A new regional household demand system for GTAP (GTAP Technical Paper No. 20). West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

  • Nadoveza, O., Sekur, T., & Beg, M. (2016). General equilibrium effects of lower labor tax burden in Croatia. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 19, 1-14. doi: 10.1515/zireb-2016-0009.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Reshaping the personal income tax in Slovenia. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Tax policy reforms 2019: OECD and selected partner economies. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/da56c295-en.

  • Páleník, V., & Miklošovič, T. (2016). CGE modelling of macroeconomic effects of environmental taxes as an EU own resource – Case of Slovakia (Working Papers 88). Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences.

  • Parry, I. W. H. (2003). On the costs of excise taxes and income taxes in the UK. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(3), 281-304.

  • Remeta, J., Perret S., Jareš, M., & Brys. B. (2015). Moving beyond the flat tax – Tax policy reform in the Slovak Republic (OECD Taxation Working Papers 22). Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Stuart, C. (1984) Welfare costs per dollar of additional tax revenue in the United States. American Economic Review, 74, 352–62.

  • Tran, C., & Wende, S. (2017) On the Marginal Excess Burden of Taxation in an Overlapping Generations Model. ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2017-652. Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.

  • Urban, I., Čok, M.,& Verbič, M. (2019) The burden of labour taxation in Croatia, Slovenia and Slovakia in the period 2011–2017, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1430-1456, DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1638291


Journal + Issues