Demand and Characteristics of Customers of Reusable Products in Slovenia

Katja Zajko 1  and Barbara Bradač Hojnik 2
  • 1 , Slovenska Bistrica, Slovenia
  • 2 University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Slovenia


The main aim of the paper is to analyse whether a demand for reusable products in Slovenia exists and to identify customers’ characteristics in terms of their gender, age, income, education and employment status. We used survey data to investigate what share of customers in Slovenia are buying and are willing to buy reusable products. Furthermore, we investigate whether there are differences between customers who are buying and who are not buying reusable products with regard to selected demographics (gender, age, income, education and employment status). The findings show that more than half of customers in Slovenia are already buying reusable products. The results of selected characteristics of individuals indicate that there are differences among buyers and non-buyers of reusable products only with regard to gender. The paper contributes to the literature on the demand for reusable products and gives better insights into the characteristics of customers buying reusable products.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Afroz, R., Masud, M. M., Akhtar, R., & Duasa, J. B. (2013). Survey and analysis of public knowledge, awareness and willingness to pay in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – a case study on household WEEE management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(1), 185–193.

  • Austin, M. P., Belbin, L., Meyers, J. A., Doherty, M. D., & Luoto, M. (2006). Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: Role of artificial data and theory. Ecological Modelling, 199(2), 197–216.

  • Babbitt, C., Ramzy, K., Williams, E., & Babbitt, G. (2009). Evolution of product lifespan and implications for environmental assessment and management: A case study of personal computers in higher education. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(13), 5106–5112.

  • Bovea, D. M., Pérez-Belis, V., & Quemades-Beltrán, P. (2017). Attitude of the stakeholders involved in the repair and second-hand sale of small household electrical and electronic equipment: Case study in Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 1(196), 91–99.

  • Buttle, F. (2006). Shopping motives constructionist perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 12(3), 349–367.

  • Chahal, M. (2013). The second-hand market: What consumers really want to buy. Retrieved from:

  • Chancerel, P., Marwede, M., Nissen, N. F., & Lang, K. D. (2015). Estimating the quantities of critical metals embedded in ICT and consumer equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 98, 9–18.

  • Cox, J., Griffith, S., Giorgi, S., & King, G. (2013). Consumer understanding of product lifetimes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, 21–29.

  • Dindarian, A., Gibson, A. A. P., & Quariguasi-Frota-Neto, J. (2012). Electronic product returns and potential reuse opportunities: A microwave case study in the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 32, 22–31.

  • Fisher, M. M., Mark, F. E., Kingsbury, T., Vehlow, J., & Yamawaki, T. (2005). Energy recovery in the sustainable recycling of plastic from end-of-life electrical and electronic products. In: International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (2005 ISEE/Summit).

  • Flash Eurobarometer. (2011). Attitudes of Europeans towards resource efficiency. Analytical report, Flash EB Series No. 316. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Flash Eurobarometer. (2014). Attitudes of Europeans towards waste management and resource efficiency. Report, Flash EB Series No. 388. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Fortuna M. L., & Diyamandoglu, V. (2017). Disposal and acquisition trends in second-hand products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2454–2462.

  • Guiot, D., & Roux, D. (2010). Second-hand shoppers’ motivation scale: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 383–399.

  • Gutiérrez, S. M., Camarero Izquierdo, C., & San José Cabezudo, R. (2010). Product and channel-related risk and involvement in online contexts. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 263–273.

  • Hennies, L., & Stamminger, R. (2016). An empirical survey on the obsolescence of appliances in German households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 73–82.

  • Hernandez, B., Jimenez, J., & Martin, M.J. (2011). Age, gender and income: Do they really moderate online behaviour? Online Information Review, 35(2), 144–126.

  • Lyndhurst, B. (2011). Public understanding of product lifetimes and durability. London, England: Defra.

  • Matos, S., & Silvestre, B. S. (2013). Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: The case of the Brazilian energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 61–73.

  • Matsumoto, M. (2010). Development of a simulation model for reuse businesses and case studies in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(13), 1284–1299.

  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Sternthal, B. (1991). Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 84–96.

  • O’Connell, M., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2013). Re-evaluate reuse of electrical and electronic equipment (evaluation and mainstreaming), EPA STRIVE Report 2007–2013. Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency

  • Premm, M. (2012). Report on implementation models for repair and re-use networks. (WP 4.1.). CERREC – Central Europe Repair and Reuse Centres and Networks. Needs assessment and model development. Retrieved from:

  • Sabbaghi, M., Behdad, S., & Zhuang, J. (2016). Managing consumer behaviour toward on-time return of the waste electrical and electronic equipment: A game theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 545–563.

  • Sata, M. (2013). Factors affecting consumer buying behavior of mobile phone devices. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(12), 103–112.

  • Scitovsky, T. (1994). Towards a theory of second-hand markets. Kyklos, 47, 33–52.

  • Scott, K. A., & Weaver, S. T. (2014). To repair or not to repair: What is the motivation? Journal for Research for Consumers, 26, 1–31.

  • Shugan, S. M. (2006). Are consumers rational? Experimental evidence? Marketing Science, 25(1), 1-7.

  • Solomon, M. R., Bamossy, G., Askegaard, S., & Hogg, M. K. (2013). Consumer behavior: A European perspective (5th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.

  • Sundin, E., Ostlin, J., & Bjorkman, M. (2008). Why is remanufacturing more successful in the United States than in Sweden? Proceedings of 15th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Sydney.

  • Watson, M. (2008). A review of literature and research on public attitudes, perceptions and behaviour relating to remanufactured, repaired and reusable products. Report for the Centre for Remanufacturing and Reuse. Sheffield: The University of Sheffield.

  • Williams, C. C., & Paddock, C. (2003). The meanings of informal and second-hand retail channels: Some evidence from Leicester. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 13(3), 317–336.

  • Yeh, R. H., Lo, H. C., & Yu, R. Y. (2010). A study of maintenance policies for second-hand products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(3), 438–444.

  • Zajko, K., & Bradac, B. (2018). Social franchising model as a scaling strategy for ICT reuse: A case study of an international franchise. Sustainability, 10(9), 1–28.


Journal + Issues