Development of Trade Relations of Bosnia and Hercegovina with Slovenia: Different Aspects and Characteristics

Snježana Brkić 1
  • 1 University of Sarajevo, School of Economics and Business, Bosnia and Herzegovina


The paper is aimed at identifying characteristics of trade relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) with the Republic of Slovenia (Slovenia) in order to contribute to determining the position of BiH in its bilateral trade. The foreign trade analysis has been performed in the context of the changing trade regime between the two countries, thereby including both institutional and functional aspects of bilateral trade relations development. Different trade indicators have been calculated and interpreted for the period of 2003-2017 and/or for selected years which were identified by a change in the institutional regulations of mutual trade flows. The research results indicate increasing trade intensity between the two countries, with almost balanced export and import flows and with prevailing inter-industry trade. The trade performance of BiH has significantly improved, with increasing intra-industry specialization and trade. However, the export structure and comparative advantage pattern are not favourable toward BiH, which points to the need for improving the country’s position in its trade with Slovenia.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anastasakis, O., & Bojičić-Dželilović V. (2002). Balkan regional cooperation & European integration. London, England: The London School of Economics and Political Science & European Institute London.

  • Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantages. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 32(2), 99-123.

  • Balassa, B. (1989). Comparative advantage, trade policy and economic development. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatscheaf, New York

  • Carbaugh, R. (2015). International economics. Fifteenth Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning

  • Directorate for European Integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina (DEI). Chronology of relations between BiH and the EU. Retrieved from

  • Erkan, B., & Sunay, Z. F. (2018). Russia’s market and product-based export diversification. Journal of Life Economics, 5(3), 43-60.

  • French, S. (2017). Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for? Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, 106(C), 83-103.

  • Greenaway, D., & Milner, C. (2003). What have we learned from a generation’s research on intra-industry trade? University of Nottingham Research Paper Series, Research Paper 2003/44.

  • Greenaway, D., Hine, R., & Milner, C. (1995). Vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade: A Cross industry analysis for the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal, 105(433), 1505-1518.

  • Grubel, H., & Lloyd, P. J. (1975). Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. London, England: The Macmillan Press.

  • Hinloopen, J., & Van Marrewijk, C. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137(1), 1-35.

  • Ito, T., & Okubo, T. (2016). Product quality and intra-industry trade. The Singapore Economic Review, 61(4), 1-22.

  • Kenen, P. (1994). The international economy. Third Edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lall, S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985-98. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 337-369.

  • Leromain, E., & Orefice, G. (2014). New revealed comparative advantage index: Dataset and empirical distribution. International Economics, 139(October), 48-70.

  • Mejia, J. F. (2011) Export diversification and economic growth: An analysis of Colombia’s export competitiveness in the European Union’s market. Germany: Physica Verlag [Online]. Retrieved from:

  • Mikić, M., & Gilbert, G. (2009). Trade statistics in policymaking: A handbook of commonly used trade indices and indicators. Revised Edition. UN ESCAP. Retrieved from

  • Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of BiH (MOFTER). (2018). Analysis of foreign trade of BiH in 2017. Sarajevo: MOFTER.

  • Olczyk, M. (2016). A systematic retrieval of international competitiveness Literature: A bibliometric study. Euroasian Economic Review, 6(3), 429–457.

  • Porter, M. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Škuflić, L. (1999). International competitiveness of Croatian economy in the European Union’s market. Economic Review, 50(10), 1310-1327.

  • United States Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration ITA. (2019). Bosnia Herzegovina Country Commercial Guide. Retrieved from

  • United States International Trade Commission (2010). ASEAN: Regional trends in economic integration, export competitiveness, and inbound investment for selected industries. Washington, DC: USITC.

  • United States Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal merger guidelines. Retrieved from

  • World Integrated Trade Solution - WITS (2019). Global Preferential Trade Agreement Library. The Agreement on Free Trade between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Slovenia. Retrieved from

  • Yilmaz, B., & Ergun, S. J. (2003). The foreign trade pattern and foreign trade specialisation of candidates of European Union. Ezoneplus Working Paper, No. 19, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence.


Journal + Issues