Professional Languages Alone Do Not Suffice for Successful and Socially Responsible Internal Communication between Different Cultures

Open access

Abstract

Successful internal communication in an intercultural environment depends on the organizational culture, business environment, social responsibility, and leaders’ skills. Thus, internal communication and employee adaptation to changing business environments ask what a successful socially responsible internal communication requires. This contribution discusses theoretical foundations of qualitative research, how the organizational culture can define which direction the organization should chose to attain social responsibility, and how internal communication can improve understanding of professional language and be decisive in a working environment. The generated model offers insights into understanding social responsibility and organizational culture to improve internal communication.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alvesson M. & Sveningsson S. (2008). Changing organizational culture (pp. 4-18). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Alvesson M. & Sveningsson S. (2014). Changing organizational culture. Second edition. London: Sage Page.

  • Alvesson M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280072

  • Arenius P. & Minniti M. (2003). Women in entrepreneurship. The entrepreneurial advantage of nations. First Annual Global Entrepreneurship Symposium 29(1) 4-8.

  • Baron D. P. (2001). Private politics corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10(1) 7-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2001.00007.x

  • Bhatt R. M. (2001). World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology 30(1) 527-550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.527

  • Bitenc P. (2006). Interno komuniciranje v podjetju Cordia [Internal communication in Cordia organization]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani Ekonomska fakulteta.

  • Carroll A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4) 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296

  • Cateora P. R. & Graham J. L. (2002). International Marketing 11th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing.

  • Crystal D. (1997). The language that took over the world. The Guardian 22(21).

  • Cunk Z. (2016). Presoja inovativnosti menedžerjev s kazenskopravnega vidika kot bistvenega kriterija družbene odgovornosti doktorska disertacija [Assessment of Innovation Managers with criminal Law aspects as the crucial Criterium of Social responsibility Doctoral Dissertations]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

  • Dauber D. Gerhard F. & Yolles M. (2012). A configuration model of organizational culture. Sage Open 1(1) 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012441482

  • Denison D. eds. (2012). Leading culture chnge in global organizations: Aligning culture and strategy. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Felber C. (2012). Die Gemeinwohl-Ökonomie. Eine demokratische Alternative wächst. Wien: Deuticke im Paul Zsolnay Verlag.

  • Fullan M. (2014). Leading in a culture of change personal action guide and workbook. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Golobič M. (2010). Transformation processes of Alpine landscapes and policy responses: top-down and bottom-up views. Society and Natural Resources 23(3) 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802029177

  • Gostiša M. (2014). Ekonomska demokracija kot nova sistemska paradigma kapitalizma [Economic democracy as a new systemic paradigm of capitalism]. Kranj: ŠCID.

  • Gostiša M. (2017). Ekonomska demokracija v 21. Stoletju [Economic democracy in the 21st century]. Kranj: ŠCID – Študijski center za industrijsko demokracijo.

  • Hrast A. Lorbek D. Mulej M. eds. (2015). Proceedings of all Ten IRDO International Conferences: Social Responsibility and Current Challenges. Maribor: IRDO - Institute for Development of Social Responsibility.

  • Hrast A. Slapnik T. & Mulej M. (2017). Nacionalna strategija družbene odgovornosti v Sloveniji – idejni osnutek [National strategy of social responsibility in Slovenia - Conceptual draft]. In: Mulej M. & Bergant Ž. (2017). Družbena odgovornost in izzivi časa 2017: Dodana vrednost kot poslovna informacija z vidika družbene odgovornosti in trajnostnega razvoja podjetij [Value added as business information from the view of social responsibility & enterprise sustainability] (pp. 13-16). Retrieved from www.irdo.si.

  • Hrastelj T. & Makovec-Brenčič M. (2003). Mednarodno trženje [International marketing]. Ljubljana: Založba GV.

  • ISO (2010): 26000. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/discovering_iso_26000.pdf.

  • Jaakson et al. (2012). Is there a coherence between organizational culture and changes in corporate social responsibility in an economic downturn? Baltic Journal of Management 7(2) 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211219813

  • Keyton J. D. Ford J. & Smith F. L. (2012). Communication collaboration and identification as facilitators and constraints of multiteams systems. Multiteam Systems: An Organization Form for Dynamic and Complex Environments 21 173-190.

  • Koskinen Y. eds. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and organization risk. Theory and empirical evidence (pp. 1-64). Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/SSRN-id1977053.pdf.

  • Lipičnik B. (2005). Reševanje konfliktov ne nasprotij [Conflict resolution and not the opposite]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

  • Martin R. (2002). Strong ties weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3) 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.427

  • McWiliams A. Siegel D. S. & Wright P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility; strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies 43(1) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

  • McWilliams A. Siegel D. S. & Wright P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies 43(1) 1-18.

  • Meyer S. D. & Hathaway W. (1993). Competition and cooperation in social movement coalitions. Lobbying for peace in the 1980s. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 38 157-183.

  • Mihalič R. (2006). Management človeškega kapitala [Human capital management]. Škofja Loka: Mihalič in Partner d.n.o.

  • Milfelner B. Potočnik A. & Šarotar Žižek S. (2015). Social responsibility human resource management and organizational performance. System Research and Behavior Science 32(2) 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2263

  • Možina S. Tavčar M. Zupan N. & Kneževič N. (2004). Poslovno komuniciranje [Business Communication]. Maribor: Obzorja založništvo in izobraževanje.

  • Mulej M. & Hrast A. (2016). Nehajte sovražiti svoje otroke in vnuke 2. knjiga [Stop hating your children and grandchildren 2nd Book]. Maribor: IRDO-Institute for development of social responsibility.

  • Mulej M. (1979). Creative work and dialectical systems theory. Maribor: Mladinska knjiga.

  • Mulej M. & Dyck R. eds. (2014 2015). Social responsibility beyond neo-liberalism and charity; four books. Shirjah UAE Bentham Science: E-book 33 chapters 48 authors from 13 countries 1. SR – A Non-Technological Innovation Process; 2. SR – Range of Perspectives per Topic and Countries; 3. SR – Sustainability Education and Management and 4. SR – Methods Dilemmas and Hopes.

  • Mumel D. (2008). Komuniciranje v poslovnem okolju [Communication in a business environment]. Maribor: De Vesta.

  • Peters T. & Waterman R. (1982). In search of excellence. London: Harper and Row.

  • Potočnik A. (2016). Viabilna regija - rezultat inoviranja z dialektično teorijo sistemov in kibernetiko poslovnih sistemov doktorska disertacija [Viable region – result of innovation process applying the dialectical systems theory and cybernetics of business systems Doctoral Dissertation]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

  • Quible Z. K. (1991). Writing competencies needed by business employers. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 33 33-51.

  • Radej B. Golobič M. & Istenič M. Č. (2010). Beyond new public management doctrine in policy impact evaluation. Slovenian Evaluation Society Retrieved from:https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1YD7BDLY/c93535f3-0157-4807-adaf-43303efde43c/PDF.

  • Rašič K. (2015). Sistem indikatorjev tehnično-tehnoloških raziskav inovativnosti in znanja na primeru tranzicijskega gospodarstva doktorska disertacija [The system of the technical-technology research innovation and knowledge indicators in a transitional economy Doctoral Dissertation]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

  • Rozman R. (2007). Pomeni in zahtevnost analiziranja za boljše odločanje [Meaning and complexity of analysis for better decision making]. Zbornik referatov 13. strokovnega posvetovanja o sodobnih vidikih analize poslovanja in organizacije [Collection of 13th edition of professional papers on professional consultations on modern aspects of business analysis and organization] (pp. 9-23). Portorož: Zveza ekonomistov Slovenije.

  • Rozman R. (2008). Spreminjanje kulture v združbah [Changing culture in organizations]. 9. znanstveno posvetovanje o organizaciji [9th Scientific consultation on the organization] (pp. 57-59). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede.

  • Rozman R. (2010). Razmerja med organizacijskimi procesi upravljanja in ravnateljevanja koordinacije in odločanja [Relationships between organizational processes of management and governance coordination and decision-making]. In: 11. znanstveno posvetovanje o organizaciji: Koordinacijski in komunikacijski vidiki organizacije združb [11th Scientific organizational consultation: Coordination and communication aspects of the organization entities] (pp. 15-21). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede UM.

  • Šarotar-Žižek S. & Mulej M. (2013). Social responsibility: A way of requisite holism of humans and their well-being. Kybernetes 42(2) 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921311310639

  • Šarotar-Žižek S. Mulej M. & Treven S. (2009). Dobro počutje/subjektivna blaginja sodelavcev kot bistveni dejavnik prehoda v inovativno družbo [Well-being/subjective well-being of employees as an essential factor in the transition to an innovative society]. Organizacija 42(3) A122-A132.

  • Šarotar-Žižek S. Treven S. & Mulej M. (2013). Creativity-based well-being of employees as a basis of future economy and society. Emerald Insight 43(2) 210-227.

  • Schein E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American psychologist. San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint.

  • Schein E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Schwab K. (2016). Četrta industrijska revolucija [Fourth Industrial Revolution]. World Economic Forum Ženeva. Retrieved from: http://assets.cdnma.com/8475/assets/Cetrta-industrijska-revolucija.pdf.

  • Štrukelj T. & Boršič D. (2014). Inoviranje posameznika podjetij in družbe za družbeno odgovornost in dobro počutje [Innovating individuals organizations and society for social responsibility and well-being]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta 1 optični disk (CD-ROM).

  • Štrukelj T. (2015). Dialektični sistem vidikov za inoviranje upravljanja in vodenja tranzicijskega podjetja [Dialectical system of viewpoints for innovating of governance and management of a transitional enterprise]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

  • Sweeney P. D. & McFarlin D. B. (2002). Organizational behavior solutions for management. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

  • Terpstra V. & Sarathy R. (2000). International marketing. Fort Worth: Dryden Press.

  • Thill J.V. & Bovee C.L. (2002). Essentials of business communication. Boston: South End Press.

  • Treven S. (2001). Mednarodno organizacijsko vedenje [International Organizational Behavior]. Ljubljana: GV.

  • Verčič A.T. Verčič D. & Sriramesh K. (2012). Internal communication. Definition parameters and the future. Public Relations Review 38(2) 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.019

  • Vidovič-Muha A. (2003). Sodobni položaj nacionalnih jezikov v luči jezikovne politike [Modern position of national languages regarding to the language policy] (pp. 5–25). Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.

  • Visser W. (2005). Corporate citizenship in South Africa: A review of progress since democracy. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 18 18-20. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.su.00004

  • Waldman D. A. et al. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies 37(6) 823-837. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400230

  • Waldman D. A. Ramirez G. G. House R. J. & Puranam P. (2004). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived enviromental uncertainity. Academy of management Journal 44(1) 134-143. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341

  • Wartick S. L. & Cochran P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review 10(4) 758-769. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279099

  • Wright M. (1999). Influences on learner attitudes towards foreign language and culture. Educational Research 41(2) 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188990410207

  • Zore M. (2016). Krepitev inovativnosti podjetij v Sloveniji z razvojem družbene odgovornosti doktorska disertacija [Strengthening Slovene Enterprises’ Innovativeness By Development Of CSR Doctoral Dissertations]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

  • Zupančič M. (2016). Inovacija upravljanja starejših znanjskih sodelavcev kot dejavnik inovativnosti in konkurenčnosti trga dela kot podsistema gospodarstva v Sloveniji [Innovation of management of older knowledge workers as a factor of innovativeness and competiveness of the labour market as a subsystems of economy in Slovenia]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 695 419 26
PDF Downloads 576 364 20