Characteristics of Innovation in Regions with Small- and Medium-Sized Towns

Open access

Abstract

Globalisation “takes” its victims, which the authors believe means that the future of small- and medium-sized towns has become uncertain in Europe. The role of centres is continuously increasing, and most researchers prefer to analyse the competitiveness and innovativeness of metropolitan areas. In this study, we characterise the small- and medium-sized towns in the central–eastern European region as well as explore their possible development path. The authors are convinced that one way for these towns to survive is through strengthening of innovation abilities, which means increasing the innovation performances of economic stakeholders and new forms of interaction among other institutions in order to handle social problems. The theoretical starting point is the interpretation and presentation of the micropolitan (without big towns) regions as well as understanding the concept of technological and social innovation. As the result of the research, the innovation measurements carried out in some of the settlements will be represented. These experiences can help the small- and medium-sized towns keep up with global competition and cancel migration and erosion of intellectual potential.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Balchin P. N. & Bull G. H. (1987). Regional and urban economics. Harper & Row London.

  • Benedek J. (2006). The characteristics of urbanization in Romania during the last century. (In Hungarian: A Romániai urbanizáció jellegzetességei az utolsó évszázad során.) In: Győri R. – Hajdú Z. (ed.): Carpathian Basin. Settlements landscapes regions spatial structures. (In Hungarian: Kárpát-medence. Települések tájak régiók térstruktúrák.) MTA RKK – Dialóg Campus Kiadó Pécs-Budapest pp. 77–102.

  • Birkner Z. & Máhr T. (2016). Interpreting innovation – in another way. Vezetéstudomány/Budapest Management Review 47(10) 39-50.

  • Birkner Z. (2010). Is innovation the engine of success also in Zala County? (In Hungarian: Zala megyében is az innováció a siker motorja?) PhD dissertation University of Pannonia Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration Veszprém

  • Clark P. (2000). The Cambridge urban history of Britain. Volume II. Cambridge University Press. pp. 425–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521431415

  • Dőry T. & Rechnitzer J. (2000). Regional innovation strategies. (In Hungarian: Regionális innovációs stratégiák.) Budapest. Oktatási Minisztérium p. 112

  • Drucker P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship practice and principles. New York Harper and Row

  • Drucker P. F. (2003). Innovation opportunities. (In Hungarian: Az innováció lehetőségei.) Harvard Businessmanager 5-6.sz. pp.28-34.

  • Enyedi Gy. (1998). Social change and urban restructuring in Central Europe. Akadémiai kiadó Budapest.

  • Ernszt I. Keller K. & Tóth-Kaszás N. (2017). Theory and practice of settlement cooperation - an example of the Pannon City Association. (In Hungarian: A települési együttműködések elmélete és gyakorlata – a Pannon Városok Szövetségének példája.) iASK KRAFT Books Institute of Higher Education (In Hungarian: Felsőbbfokú Tanumányok Intézete) 2017 pp. 39 146.

  • ESPON TOWN (2013). Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context. Scientific Report. ESPON & KU Leuven.

  • Foray D. (2015). Smart specialisation opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Routledge.

  • Gál Z. (2013). Policy aspects of innovation governance: Central and regional management of innovation in Hungary. (In Hungarian: Az innovációs kormányzás szakpolitikai vetületei – Az innováció központi és regionális irányítása Magyarországon.) In: Innovation-friendly governance in Hungary (In Hungarian: Innovációbarát kormányzás Magyarországon) ed. Gál Z. 2013 pp. 59-103.

  • Horeczki R. (2016). Evaluation of the development trends of small-towns in Eastern Europe in the XX century. (In Hungarian: Kelet-európai kisvárosok fejlődési tendenciáinak értékelése a XX. században.) In: Lengyel I. – Nagy B. (szerk.) Competitiveness smart specialization and re-industrialization of regions (In Hungarian: Térségek versenyképessége intelligens szakosodása és újraiparosodás) JATEPress Szeged pp. 255–271.

  • Karlsson C. & Johansson B. (2004). Towards a dynamic theory for the spatial knowledge economy. The Royal Institute of Technology Centre of Excellence for Studies in Science and Innovation.

  • Kaszás N. Birkner Z. Németh K. & Kovács T. (2016). Similarities and differences in the success of the application projects. The success of the Austria-Hungary Cross-border Co-operation Program. (In Hungarian: Hasonlóságok és különbségek a pályázati projektek sikerében. Az Ausztria-Magyarország Határon Átnyúló Együttműködési Program sikervizsgálata.) Deturope 8(1) 61-77.

  • Korcelli P. (2000). The Polish urban system: stability and change. Experience of the 1990s. In Horváth Gy. (ed.): Regions and Cities in the Global World. Pécs Centre for Regional Studies pp. 159–175.

  • Leeuwen G. et al. (2009). Productivity effects of innovation modes: Work in Progress. Statistics Netherland Working Paper Nr. 4.

  • Lukovics M. (2008). Measuring the competitiveness of regions. (In Hungarian: Térségek versenyképességének mérése). JATEPress Szeged pp. 32-90.

  • Malota E. & Kelemen K. (2011). International marketing in domestic practice. (In Hungarian: Nemzetközi marketing a hazai gyakorlatban.) (ed). Harlow: Pearson Custom Publishing.

  • Malota E. (2015). Marketing in international space. Case studies on domestic and foreign markets. (In Hungarian: Marketing nemzetközi színtéren. Esettanulmányok a hazai és külföldi piacokról) (ed.) Budapest: Alinea Kiadó.

  • Markov N. & Dobrinsky R. (2009). Innovation and firm performance in Bulgaria. Some First empirical results.

  • McCann F. & Ortega-Argilés R. (2016). Smart specialisation entrepreneurship and SMEs: Issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy. Published: February Springerlink.

  • Michalkó G. (2001). Social and geographical aspects of tourism in Budapest. European Spatial Research and Policy 8(1) 105-118.

  • Mulgan G. Tucker S. Rushanara A. & Sanders B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is why it matters and how it can be accelerated? Said Business School University of Oxford; Oxford.

  • Németh K. (2017). Innovation challenges of rural areas. Renewable energy alternatives. (In Hungarian: Vidéki térségek innovációs kihívásai. Megújuló energia alternatívák) Pannon Egyetemi Kiadó/University of Pannonia Press Veszprém ISBN: 978-963-396-096-7 73-78.

  • Németh K. & Pintér G. (2014). The pillars of regional and municipal level energy-planning processes. 20th Youth Science Forum University of Pannonia Georgikon Faculty May 23-24.

  • OMB (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Federal Register Office of Management and Budget No. 249 pp. 82228-82238.

  • Oslo manual guidelines for collecting and interpeting innovation data. Third edition. p. 30.

  • Rekettye G. Tóth T. & Malota E. (2015). International marketing. (In Hungarian: Nemzetközi marketing.) Akadémiai Kiadó.

  • Schumpeter J. A. (1939). The theory of economic development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Szunyogh Zs. (2010). Methodological questions of measuring innovation. (In Hungarian: Az innováció mérésének módszertani kérdései.) Statistical Review (In Hungarian: Statisztikai Szemle) 88. évfolyam 5. szám p. 499; p. 502.

  • Thissen-Frank van Oort M. Diodato D. & Ruijs A. (2013). Regional competitiveness and smart specialization in Europe. Place-based development in international economic networks. Publisher: Edward Elgar ISBN: 978 1 78254 515 6.

  • Vas Zs. & Bajmócy Z. (2012). The 25 years of innovation systems. (In Hungarian: Az innovációs rendszerek 25 éve.) Economics Review (In Hungarian: Közgazdasági Szemle) LI X. évf. 2012. november: p. 1233–1256.

  • Vecsenyi J. (2003). Entrepreneurship - from idea to start up. (In Hungarian: Vállalkozás - Az ötlettől az újrakezdésig.) Aula Budapest.

  • Zsarnoczky M. (2016). The impact of silver tourism on rural areas. annals of the polish association of agricultural and agribusiness economists (Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Rolnictwa I Agrobiznesu) Scientific Annals/Roczniki Naukowe XVIII (3) pp. 405.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 310 203 35
PDF Downloads 257 177 10