Dimensions of Decision-Making Process Quality and Company Performance: A Study of Top Managers in Slovenia

Open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between the dimensions of the decisionmaking process quality and company performance of top managers’ in Slovenia. We found out that companies whose managers exhibit an above-average dimension of openness of spirit in the quality of the decision making process, on average, have a higher stance on foreign markets as companies in which managers show a below-average open spirit. For the managers who work in companies that are present in foreign markets, we could confirm that there is a low/weak correlation between the dimension of effort of the decision-making process quality and the number of employees in a company.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amason A.C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. The Academy of Management Journal 39(1) 123 – 143. https://doi.org/10.2307/256633

  • Cabantous L. & Gond J.-P. (2011). Rational decision making as performance praxis: explaining Rationality’s Eternel Retour. Organization Science 22(3) 573 – 586. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0534

  • Cankar G. & Bajec B. (2003). Effect size as a supplement to statistical significance testing. Horizons of Psychology 12(2) 97 – 112.

  • Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge New York.

  • Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 112(1) 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

  • Carifio J. Perla R.J. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings misconceptions persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes Journal of Social Sciences 3(3) 106-116. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.106.116

  • Colvin C. (1997). The most valuable quality in a manager. Fortune 29 December 179 – 280.

  • Cornish R. (2007). Statistics: 3.1 Cluster Analysis. Mathematics Learning Support Centre. Retrieved from http://www.statstutor.ac.uk/resources/uploaded/clusteranalysis.pdf.

  • Dean J.W. and Sharfman M.P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision making process. Academy of Management Journal 39(2) 368 – 396. https://doi.org/10.2307/256784

  • Driver M.J. Brousseau K.R. & Hunsaker P.L. (1990). The Dynamic Decision Maker: Five Decision Styles for Executive and Business Success. Harper & Row New York.

  • Ducker P.F. (1967). The effective decision. Harvard Business review 45(January – February) 92 – 98.

  • Eisenhardt K.M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32(3) 543 – 576. https://doi.org/10.2307/256434

  • Gilmore A. (1998). Quality in management decision making within a changing context. Journal of Management Development 17(2) 106 – 120. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719810206014

  • Guillemette M.G. Laroche M. and Cadieux J. (2014). Defining decision making process performance: conceptualization and validation of an index. Information & Management 51 618 – 626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.012

  • Harrison F.E. & Pelletier M.A. (2000). The essence of management decision’. Management Decision 38(7) 462 – 469. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010373476

  • Kelley K. & Preacher K.J. (2012). On Effect Size. Psychological Methods. 17 (2) 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028086

  • Klingebiel R. and Meyer A.D. (2012). Becoming aware of the unknown: decision making during the implementation of a strategic initiative. Organization Science 24(1) 133 – 153. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0726

  • Jackson T. (1991). Measuring Management Performance. A Development Approach for Trainers and Consultants. Kogan Page London.

  • Malaska P. & Holstius K. (1999). Visionary management The journal of futures studies strategic thinking and policy 1(4) 353 – 361.

  • Malakooti B. (2010). Decision making process: typology intelligence and optimization. Journal of Inteligent Manufacturing 23(3) 733 – 746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0424-1

  • McLaughlin D.I. (1995). Strengthening executive decision making. Human Resource Management 34(3) 443 – 461. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930340307

  • Rausch E. & Anderson C. (2011). Enhancing decisions with criteria for quality. Management Decision 49(5) 722 – 733. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111130814

  • Sawilowsky S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8(2) 467–474. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

  • Schwenk C. (1995). Strategic Decision Making. Journal of Management. 21(3) 471 – 493. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100304

  • Wagner-Mainardes E. Alves H. & Raposo M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships Management Decision 50(10) 1861 – 1879. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211279648

  • Xi R. & Wunsch II D.C. (2008). Recent advances in cluster analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics 1(4) 484 – 508. https://doi.org/10.1108/17563780810919087

  • Ying-Chieh C. Shui-Chuan C. & Ying-Hao C. (2013). Decision quality by the loss cost of Type I and Type II errors. The TQM Journal 25(2) 202 – 220. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731311299627

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 887 337 31
PDF Downloads 755 357 44