Does Grade Level Matter for the Assessment of Business Process Management Maturity?

Open access


The purpose of this paper is to create and test the practical application of a business process management maturity assessment conducted at two different grade levels (management and professional level) in an organization. The conceptual framework for this research includes creating a business process maturity indicator (BPMI) for six process areas: strategy, documentation, optimization, implementation, execution, and controlling. The comparative analysis of the business process management maturity is performed using the BPMI on two cases: inside a single organization and the sector internally.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. BOC. (2007). Process management life cycle (PMLC) BOC information system GmbH. Retrieved from

  • 2. Crosby P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • 3. Dobrzyński M. Dziekoński K. & Jurczuk A. (2012). A diagnosis of process maturity in a business cluster initiative. Contemporary Management Quarterly 3 41-50.

  • 4. Gibson D. L. Goldenson D. R. & Kost K. (2006). Performance results of CMMI-based process improvement. Technical Report CMU/ SEI-2006-004 (pp. 5-6).

  • 5. Hallerbach A. Bauer T. & Reichert M. (2008). Managing process variants in the process life cycle. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) Barcelona (pp. 154-161).

  • 6. Hammer M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review 85(4) 111-123.

  • 7. Harmon P. (2007). Business process change: A guide for business managers and BPM and Six Sigma professionals. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

  • 8. Houy C. Fettke P. & Loos P. (2010). Empirical research in business process management-analysis of an emerging field of research. Business Process Management Journal 16(4) 619-661.

  • 9. Humphrey W. S. (1988). Characterizing the software process: a maturity framework. Software 5(2) 73-79.

  • 10. Jost W. & Scheer A. W. (2002). Business process management: a core task for any company organization. In A. W. Scheer M. Kirchmer & W. Jost (Eds.) Business process excellence: Aris in practice (pp. 33-43). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

  • 11. Jurczuk A. & Gabryelczyk R. (2015). Cele doskonalenia przedsiębiorstw w kontekście dojrzałości procesowej. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej Organizacja i Zarządzanie 83(1941) 245-254.

  • 12. Kalinowski T. B. (2011). Modele oceny dojrzałości procesów. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica 258 173-187.

  • 13. Kohlbacher M. (2010). The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Business Process Management Journal 16(1) 135-152.

  • 14. Kohlbacher M. & Reijers H. A. (2013). The effects of process-oriented organizational design on firm performance. Business Process Management Journal 19(2) 245-262.

  • 15. Lockamy A. & McCormack K. (2004). Development of a chain management process maturity model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 9(4) 272-278.

  • 16. Macedo de Morais R. Kazan S. Inês Dallavalle de Pádua S. & Lucirton Costa A. (2014). An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposal. Business Process Management Journal 20(3) 412-432.

  • 17. McCormack K. P. & Johnson W. C. (2001). Business process orientation. Gaining the e-business competitive advantage. New York: St. Lucie Press.

  • 18. Netjes M. Reijers H. & Van der Aalst W. P. (2006). Supporting the BPM life-cycle with FileNet. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD) Namur University Namur (pp. 497-508).

  • 19. Nosowski A. (2010). Zarządzanie procesami w instytucjach finansowych. Warszawa: CH Beck.

  • 20. OMG. (2008). Business process maturity model (BPMM) version 1.0 object management group (Document Number: formal/2008-06-01). Retrieved from

  • 21. Rosemann M. & de Bruin T. (2005). Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model. Proceedings of the thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) Regensburg Paper 37.

  • 22. Retrieved from

  • 23. Rosemann M. de Bruin T. & Power B. (2006). BPM maturity. In J. Jeston & J. Nelis (Eds.) Business process management: Practical guidelines to successful implementations (pp. 313-329). Burlington: Elsevier.

  • 24. Roztocki N. & Weistroffer H. R. (2015). Information and communication technology in transition economies: An assessment of research trends. Information Technology for Development 21(3) 330-364.

  • 25. Röglinger M. Poppelbuss J. & Becker J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal 18(2) 328-346.

  • 26. SEI. (2006). Appraisal requirements for CMMI version 1.2 (ARC V1.2). Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006-TR-011 ESC-TR-2006-011.

  • Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute.

  • 27. Van der Aalst W. M. (2004). Business process management: a personal view. Business Process Management Journal 10(2) 248-253.

  • 28. Verma N. (2009). Business process management: Profiting from process. New Delhi: Global India.

  • 29. Wayne S. J. & Linden R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal 38(1) 232-260.

  • 30. Weske M. (2007). Business process management: Concepts languages architectures. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

  • 31. Zur Muehlen M. & Ho D. T. Y. (2006). Risk management in the BPM life cycle. In Business process management workshops (pp. 454-466). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

  • 32. Zwicker J. Fettke P. & Loos P. (2010). Business process maturity in public administrations. In J. vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.) Handbook on business process management 2 (pp. 369-396). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 208 110 5
PDF Downloads 144 99 7