This paper aims at identifying the direction for more sustainable development of the use of concrete in road infrastructure in an industrialised context.
The increase in the global mean temperature is one of the most severe challenges today. The concrete industry is responsible for significant emissions of greenhouse gases, most attributable to cement production. However, concrete is one of the most important building materials in the world and indispensable for the societal development in countries at all development stages. Thus, the concrete industry needs to take measures for reducing emissions.
This paper investigates possible directions for the development of the concrete industry, to reduce climatic impact and accommodate positive societal growth. The investigation is carried out as a SWOT analysis, focusing on three terms dominating the present discussion on any development within the construction industry; sustainability, industrialisation and digitalisation. The result is a thorough discussion and a set of recommendations for the direction of future research and innovation on sustainable use of concrete in the construction of road infrastructure. The major opportunities and threats are summarised in the conclusions, and future research to be carried out in two of the authors’ PhD-projects are described.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Mehta P K “Global concrete industry sustainability” Concrete international vol. 31 no. 2 pp. 45-48 2009.
2. Pachauri R and Meyer L “Climate change 2014 Synthesis Report-Summary for Policymakers” ed: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2014.
3. Samferdselsdepartement “Meld. St. 33 Nasjonal Transportplan 2018-2029 (in Norwegian) (National Transport Plan 2018-2029)” Oslo Norway2017.
4. Jahren P and Sui T Concrete and sustainability. CRC Press 2013.
5. Jiang R Mao C Hou L Wu C and Tan J “A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China’s new urbanisation” Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 173 pp. 225-234 2018/02/01/2018.
6. Yuan H “A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management” Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 39 pp. 1-8 2013/01/01/2013.
7. Brundtland G H Our common future Oxford: Oxford University Press 1987. [Online]. Available.
8. CEMBUREAU The European Cement Association. (2016 17.03). Key figures. Available: https://cembureau.eu/cement-101/key-facts-figures/
9. Scrivener K L John V M and Gartner E M “Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry” Cement and Concrete Research vol. 114 pp. 2-26 2018/12/01/2018.
10. United Nations. (2017 22.03). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-populationprospects-the-2017-revision.html
11. Benhelal E Zahedi G Shamsaei E and Bahadori A “Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry” Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 51 pp. 142-161 2013/07/15/2013.
12. Habert G Denarié E Šajna A and Rossi P “Lowering the global warming impact of bridge rehabilitations by using Ultra High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concretes” Cement and Concrete Composites vol. 38 pp. 1-11 2013/04/01/2013.
13. Xuan D Poon C S and Zheng W “Management and sustainable utilization of processing wastes from ready-mixed concrete plants in construction: A review” Resources Conservation and Recycling vol. 136 pp. 238-247 2018/09/01/2018.
14. Norwegian Public Road Administration Håndbok N400 Bruprosjektering (in Norwegian) (Maunal N400 Bridge design). Oslo: Directorate of Public Roads 2015.
15. Norwegian Public Road Administration Håndbok N500 Vegtunneler (in Norwegian) (Manual N500 Road Tunnel design). Oslo: Directorate of Public Roads 2016.
16. Russell H G and Graybeal B A “Ultra-high performance concrete: A state-of-the-art report for the bridge community” 2013.
17. Thorstensen R Larsen I Heimdal A and Hansen H “LCC and carbon footprint of bridge made from locally produced UHPC compared to standard concrete” in Proceedings of HiPerMat 2016 4th International Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Concrete and High Performance Materials 2016.
18. National addition to Eurocode 2–Design of concrete structures: Specific rules for ultrahigh performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) NF P18-710 2016.
19. Recommendation: Ultra High Fibre Reinforced Cement-Based composites (UHPFRC): Construction material dimensioning and application SIA 2052 2016.
20. Brühwiler E “Structural UHPFRC”: Welcome to the post-concrete era” in First International Interactive Symposium on UHPC 2016.
21. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures–part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings EN 1992-1-1:2004 2004.
22. Randl N Steiner T Ofner S Baumgartner E and Mészöly T “Development of UHPC mixtures from an ecological point of view” Construction and Building Materials vol. 67 pp. 373-378 2014/09/30/2014.
23. Habert G Arribe D Dehove T Espinasse L and Le Roy R “Reducing environmental impact by increasing the strength of concrete: quantification of the improvement to concrete bridges” Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 35 pp. 250-262 2012/11/01/2012.
24. Liew K M Sojobi A O and Zhang L W “Green concrete: Prospects and challenges” Construction and Building Materials vol. 156 pp. 1063-1095 2017/12/15/2017.
25. Larsen I L Aasbakken I G O’Born R Vertes K and Thorstensen R T “Determining the Environmental Benefits of Ultra High Performance Concrete as a Bridge Construction Material” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2017 vol. 245 no. 5 p. 052096: IOP Publishing.
26. Fidjestol P and Thorstensen R T “Improving sustainability of concrete construction - the role of high strength high performance concrete” presented at the 37th Conference on Our World in Concrete and Structures Singapore 2012.
27. Larsen I L Thorstensen R T and Vertes K “Lowering environmental impact from UHPC utilizing industrial by-products” in 12th fib International PhD-Symposium in Civil Engineering Prague 2018 pp. 93 - 101: Federation internationale du beton (fib).
28. Bygg21 “Tenk nytt – bruk kjente løsninger (in Norwegian) (Think New - Use Known Solutions)” 2019 Available: https://www.bygg21.no/rapporter-og-veiledere/tenk-nyttbruk-kjente-losninger/.
29. Thorstensen R T Kalsaas B T Skaar J and Jensen S “Last planner system innovation efforts on requirements for digital management system” in Annual conference of the international group for lean construction 2013 vol. 21.
30. The American Institute of Architects (AIA National & AIA California Council) “Integrated Project Delivery: A guide” 2007.
31. Fédération internationale du béton (fib) Precast Concrete Bridges: State-of-the-art report. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib) 2004.
32. Heimdal A Larsen I L and Norheim T “Standardisering av brokonstruksjoner for nasjonale hovedveier (in Norwegian) (Standardization of bridge structures for national highways)” Engineering science University of Agder Grimstad 2017.
33. Bårseth E and Birkeland K “Bestandighet og holdninger til flerspenns prefabrikkerte brokonstruksjoner (in Norwegian) (Durability and attitudes towards multi-span prefabricated bridge structures)” BSc thesis University of Agder 2018.
34. Persson S “«Brubjelkeprosjektet» (in Norwegian) (“The bridge beam project”)” presented at the Brukonferansen 2017 Oslo 2017. Available: https://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/2069373/binary/1218553?fast_title=Betongelementer.+Stian+Persson+%285+MB%29.pdf
35. Amundsen I “Vegen i landskapet om vakre veger (in Norwegian) (The road in the landscape about beautiful roads)” in “Norwegian Public Roads Administration reports” No. 300 2014.
36. Sandvik C and Fougner F “BIM as a tool for sustainable design” in The International Federation for Structural Concrete 5th International fib Congress Better - Smarter - Stronger 7 – 11 October 2018 Melbourne Australia 2018 pp. 786-791: fib (Fédération internationale du béton).
37. Azhar S “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends Benefits Risks and Challenges for the AEC Industry” Leadership and Management in Engineering vol. 11 no. 3 pp. 241-252 2011.