Variable dynamics of cadmium uptake and allocation in four soybean cultivars

Monika Bardáčová 1 , Yevheniia Konotop 2 , Zuzana Gregorová 3 , Miroslav Horník 1 , Jana Moravčíková 3 , Ján Kraic 4 , and Ildikó Matušíková 1
  • 1 Department of Ecochemistry and Radioecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, SK-917 01, Trnava
  • 2 Department of Plant Biology, Educational and Scientific Center “Institute of Biology and Medicine”, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 016 01, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 3 Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Centre of Biology and Biodiversity Slovak Academy of Sciences, , SK-950 07, Nitra
  • 4 Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, SK-917 01


Cadmium is a serious environmental pollutant and its uptake by plant represents a serious health risk. Uptake, accumulation as well as sensitivity of soybean plants to metals have been shown to vary with genotype, while the dynamics of this uptake has rarely been studied. Here we studied the uptake and accumulation of Cd2+ ions in different parts of soybean plants of four cultivars Moravians, Gallec, Kent and Cardiff. The plants at early developmental stage were immersed in Hoagland nutrient solution in the presence or absence of 50 mg.L−1 and the isotope of 109Cd2+ to monitor its accumulation continuously at 24 h intervals for 10 days. Our results showed that the uptake rate varied among the cultivars, being the highest in roots of the cv. Moravians and the lowest in the cv. Gallec. We also observed a non-even distribution of radioactivity within the entire plants of individual cultivars. The most of Cd2+ isotope was translocated into primary leaves and leaves in the cvs. Kent and Moravians; on the contrary, relatively less in the cvs. Cardiff and Gallec. The results were fitted with genetic potential, growth as well as defense parameters such as proline accumulation. Combining uptake dynamics and biochemical data are indicative for different tolerance strategies of soybeans.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arao T, Ae N, Sugiyama M, Takahashi M. (2003). Genotypic differences in cadmium uptake and distribution in soybeans. Plant Soil 251: 247-253.

  • Bardáčová M, Maglovski M, Gregorová Z, Konotop Y, Horník M, Moravčíková J, Kraic J, Mihálik D, Matušíková I (2016) The activity of cell-wall modifying β-1,3-glucanases in soybean grown in presence of heavy metals. Nova Biotechnol. Chim.15: 114-121.

  • Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-207.

  • Békésiová I, Nap JP, Mlynárová L (1999) Isolation of high quality DNA and rna from leaves of the carnivorous plant Drosera rotundifolia. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 17: 269-277.

  • Benitez ER, Hajika M, Yamada T, Takahashi K, Oki N, Yamada N, Nakamura T, Kanamaru K (2010) A major QTL controlling seed cadmium accumulation in soybean. Crop Sci. 50: 1728-1734.

  • Cataldo DA, Garland TR, Wildung RE (1983) Cadmium uptake kinetics in intact soybean plants. Plant Physiol. 73: 844-848.

  • Granec M, Šurina B (1999) Atlas pôd SR [Atlas of soils of Slovak Republic]. Bratislava: Výskumný ústav pôdoznalectva a ochrany pôdy, 1999. 60 p. [in Slovak]

  • Jegadeesan S, Yu K, Poysa V, Gawalko E, Morrison MJ, Shi C, Cober E (2010) Mapping and validation of simple sequence repeat markers linked to a major gene controlling seed cadmium accumulation in soybean Glycine max (l.) Merr. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121: 283-294.

  • Jha UC, Bohra A (2016) Genomics enabled breeding approaches for improving cadmium stress tolerance in plants. Euphytica 208: 1-31.

  • Parrotta L, Guerriero G, Sergeant K, Cai G, Hausman JF (2015) Target or barrier? The cell wall of early- and later-diverging plants vs. cadmium toxicity: differences in the response mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 6: 133.

  • Piršelová B, Mistríková V, Libantová J, Moravčíková J, Matušíková I (2012) Study on metal-triggered callose deposition in roots of maize and soybean. Biologia 67: 698-705.

  • Rodriguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas MC, Pazmino DM, Testillano PS, Risueno MC, del Rio LA, Sandalio LM (2009) Cellular response of pea plants to cadmium toxicity: cross talk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium. Plant Physiol. 150: 229-243.

  • Schützendübel A, Polle A (2002) Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 1351-1365.

  • Six L, Smolders E (2014) Future trends in soil cadmium concentration under current cadmium fluxes to european agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 485-486: 319-328.

  • Socha P, Bernstein N, Rybanský L, Mészáros P, Gálusová T, Spieß N, Libantová J, Moravčíková J, Matušíková I (2015) Cd accumulation potential as a marker for heavy metal tolerance in soybean. Israel J. Plant Sci. 62: 160-166.

  • Van Kerkhove E, Pennemans V, Swennen Q (2010) Cadmium and transport of ions and substances across cell membranes and epithelia. BioMetals 23: 823-855.

  • Zhao Y, Zhang SJ, Wen N, Zhang C, Wang J, Liu Z (2017) Modeling uptake of cadmium from solution outside of root to cell wall of shoot in rice seedling. Plant Growth Regul. 82: 11-20.


Journal + Issues