Shakespeare in Digital Games and Virtual Worlds

Open access

Abstract

Shakespeare’s plays have long flirted with using various artistic and medial forms other than theatre, such as cinema, music, visual arts, television, comics, animation and, lately, digital games and virtual worlds. Especially in the 20th and 21st century, a fascination with Shakespeare both as a historical and theatrical figure and as a playwright has become evident in screen based media (cinema, television and video), ranging from “faithful,” almost documented performances of his plays to free style adaptations or vague film references. Digital games and virtual worlds carry on this tradition of the transmedial journey of Shakespeare’s plays to screen based media but top it up with new forms of interaction and performativity. For the first time in the history of mankind everyone can enjoy firsthand from his armchair and for free the experience of taking part in a play by the Bard by entering a virtual world as if it was a stage and by assuming roles through avatars.

The article attempts first to introduce the reader to the deeper needs that gave rise to animation, a fundamental aspect of digital gaming and virtual worlds. It then tries to illuminate the various facets of digital performance and gaming, especially in relation to Shakespeare-themed and inspired digital games and virtual worlds, by putting forward some axes of classification. Finally, it both suggests some ideas that may be of use in rendering the Shakespeare gaming experience more “complete” and “theatrical” and ends by acknowledging the immense potential for the exploration of theatricality and performativity in digital games and virtual worlds.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aarseth Espen and Gordon Calleja (talk). “The Word Game: The Ontology of an Undefinable Object” The Philosophy of Computer Games 2009 13-15 August 2009 Oslo.

  • Ball Robert Hamilton. Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. Routledge Library Editions: Film and Literature vol.1. London New York: Routledge 2013.

  • Bell John. “Death and Performing Objects” 27 January 2016. <http://www.nyu.edu/classes/bkg/death.txt>.

  • Bell Mark W. “Toward a Definition of ‘Virtual Worlds’” Virtual Worlds Research: Past Present and Future 1.1 (2008): 1-5. 14 January 2016 <http://journals.tdl.org/jvwr/index.php/jvwr/article/viewFile/283/237>.

  • Best Michael. “Electronic Shakespeare: Which Way Goes the Game?” The Shakespeare Newsletter Spring/Summer (2008): 29 37.

  • Bloom Gina. “Videogame Shakespeare: Enskilling Audiences through Theater-Making Games” 4 February 2016. <http://english.ucdavis.edu/sites/english.ucdavis.edu/files/users/gbloom/Videogame%20Shakespeare.pdf>. 114-127.

  • Bloom Gina. “Videogame Shakespeare: Enskilling Audiences through Theater-Making Games” Shakespeare Studies 43 (2015): 114-127.

  • Boose Lynda E. and Richard Burt eds. Shakespeare The Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film TV and Video. London New York: Routledge 2005.

  • Bowman Sarah Lynne. The Functions of Role-Playing Games – How Participants Create Community Solve Problems and Explore Identity. Jefferson NC London: McFarland and Company Inc. Publishers 2010.

  • Buchanan Judith R. Shakespeare on Film. London New York: Routledge 2014.

  • Burnett Mark Thornton Adrian Streete and Ramona Wray eds. The Edinburgh Companion to Shakespeare and the Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2011.

  • Causey Matthew. Theatre and Performance in Digital Culture: From simulation to embeddedness. London New York: Routledge 2007.

  • Crary Jonathan. “Techniques of the Observer” 14 January 2016 <https://itp.nyu.edu/classes/mindseye-spring2014/files/2015/01/Crary_Techniques.pdf>.

  • Crawford Chris. The art of computer game design. 20 January 2016. <http://wwwrohan.sdsu.edu/~stewart/cs583/ACGD_ArtComputerGameDesign_ChrisCrawford_1982.pdf>.

  • Davies Anthony and Stanley Wells eds. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.

  • Georgopoulou Xenia. Gender Issues in Shakespeare’s Theatre and the Renaissance. Athens: Papazisis 2010.

  • Habgood Matthew Peter Jacob. “The Effective Integration of Digital Games and Learning Content” Diss. University of Nottingham 2007.

  • Heliö Satu. “Role-Playing: A Narrative Experience and a Mindset” Beyond Role and Play: Tools Toys and Theory for Harnessing the Imagination. Eds. Markus Montola and Jaakko Stenros. Helsinki Ropecon Ry 2004. 65-74.

  • Holderness Graham. Visual Shakespeare: Essays in Film and Television. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press 2002.

  • Huang Alexander Cheng-Yuan and Charles Stanley Ross. Shakespeare in Hollywood Asia and Cyberspace. West Lafayette Indiana: Purdue University Press 2009.

  • Jackson Russell ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.

  • Jamieson Helen Varley. “Adventures in Cyberformance: experiments at the interface of theatre and the internet” Diss. Queensland University of Technology 2008. 27 January 2016. <http://eprints.qut.edu.au/28544/1/Helen_Jamieson_Thesis.pdf>.

  • Juul Jesper. Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge MA: MIT Press 2005.

  • King Geoff and Tanya Krzywinska. ScreenPlay: Cinema/videogames/interfaces. London: Wallflower Press 2002.

  • Klevjer Rune. “What is the avatar? Fiction and Embodiment in Avatar-Based Singleplayer Computer Games” Diss. University of Bergen 2006. 19 January 2016. <http://folk.uib.no/smkrk/docs/RuneKlevjer_What%20is%20the%20Avatar_finalprint.pdf>.

  • Landy Robert J. Persona and Performance. New York: Guilford Press 1996.

  • Lehman Farrah. “‘The Future in the Instant’: Posthumanism(s) in Early Modern English Drama” Diss. University of Nebraska 2010. 4 February 2016. <http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019andcontext=englishdiss>.

  • Mackay Daniel. The Fantasy Role-Playing Game: A New Performing Art. Jefferson NC: McFarland and Company Inc. 2001.

  • Ögutku Murat. “Shakespeare in Animation” 4 February 2016. <http://www.ide.hacettepe.edu.tr/ekitap/Ogutcu.pdf>.

  • Olf Julian. “The Man/Marionette Debate in Modern Theatre” Educational Theatre Journal 26.4 (1974). 488-494.

  • Pavis Patrice and Christine Shantz. Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms Concepts and Analysis. Toronto Buffalo: University of Toronto Press 1998.

  • Pischel Richard and Mildred Tawney. The Home of the Puppet Play. London: Luzac and Co. Publishers in the India Office 1902. 27 January 2016. <http://ia600302.us.archive.org/16/items/homeofpuppetplay00piscrich/homeofpuppetplay00piscrich.pdf>.

  • Reynolds Ren. “MMOs as Practices.” Situated Play Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference September 24-28 2007 Tokyo. 20 January 2016. <http://www.digra.org/dl/db/07311.51541.pdf.>.

  • Rothwell Kenneth S. A History of Shakespeare on Screen: A Century of Film and Television. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.

  • Rothwell Kenneth S. and Annabelle H. Melzer. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography. London: Mansell 1990.

  • Salen Katie and Eric Zimmerman. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge: The MIT Press 2004.

  • Shaughnessy Robert ed. Shakespeare On Film. New Casebooks. Basingstoke: McMillan Press 1998.

  • Thomas Douglas and John Seely Brown. “Why Virtual Worlds Can Matter” IJLM 1.1 (2009). 14 January 2016. <http://johnseelybrown.com/virtualworlds.pdf>. 37-49.

  • Tychsen Anders. “Role-Playing Games – Comparative Analysis Across Two Media Platforms” 19 January 2016. <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1231906&dl=ACM&coll=DL&CFID=769038093&CFTOKEN=28520834>.

  • Vallius Laura Tony Manninen and Tomi Kujanpää. “Interaction Manifestations at the Roots of Experiencing Multiplayer Computer Games” Situated Play Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference September 24-28 2007 Tokyo. 20 January 2016. <http://www.digra.org/dl/db/07311.48262.pdf>. 74-82.

  • White Tony. Animation from Pencils to Pixels: Classical Techniques for Digital Animators. Burlington and Oxford: Focal Press 2006.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.08

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.1

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 206 206 11
PDF Downloads 187 187 16