The Relationship between MR Parameters and Biomechanical Quantities of Loaded Human Articular Cartilage in Osteoarthritis: An In-Vitro Study

V. Juráš, P. Szomolányi, S. Gäbler 3 , I. Frollo 2  and S. Trattnig 1
  • 1 MR Center, Highfield MR, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 2 Department of Imaging Methods, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravska cesta 9, 84104 Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 3 TU Wien, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, Vienna, Austria

The Relationship between MR Parameters and Biomechanical Quantities of Loaded Human Articular Cartilage in Osteoarthritis: An In-Vitro Study

The aim of this study was to assess the changes in MRI parameters during applied load directly in MR scanner and correlate these changes with biomechanical parameters of human articular cartilage. Cartilage explants from patients who underwent total knee replacement were examined in the micro-imaging system in 3T scanner. Respective MRI parameters (T1 without- and T1 with contrast agent as a marker of proteoglycan content, T2 as a marker of collagen network anisotropy and ADC as a measure of diffusivity) were calculated in pre- and during compression state. Subsequently, these parameters were compared to the biomechanical properties of articular cartilage, instantaneous modulus (I), equilibrium modulus (Eq) and time of tissue relaxation (τ). Significant load-induced changes of T2 and ADC were recorded. High correlation between T1Gd and I (r = 0.6324), and between ADC and Eq (r = -0.4884) was found. Multi-parametric MRI may have great potential in analyzing static and dynamic biomechanical behavior of articular cartilage in early stages of osteoarthritis (OA).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Mlynarik, V., Trattnig, S. (2000). Physicochemical properties of normal articular cartilage and its MR appearance. Investigative Radiology, 35, 589-594.

  • Burstein, D., Bashir, A., Gray, M.L. (2000). MRI techniques in early stages of cartilage disease. Investigative Radiology, 35, 622-638.

  • Herberhold, C., Stammberger, T., Faber, S., Putz, R., Englmeier, K.H., Reiser, M., Eckstein, F. (1998). An MR-based technique for quantifying the deformation of articular cartilage during mechanical loading in an intact cadaver joint. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 39, 843-850.

  • Sah, R.L.Y., Kim, Y.J., Doong, J.Y.H., Grodzinsky, A.J., Plaas, A.H.K., Sandy, J.D. (1989). Biosynthetic response of cartilage explants to dynamic compression. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 7, 619-636.

  • Stammberger, T., Herberhold, C., Faber, S., Englmeier, K.H., Reiser, M., Eckstein, F. (1998). A method for quantifying time dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage as a function of tissue deformation in intact joints. Medical Engineering & Physics, 20, 741-749.

  • Kaufman, J.H., Regatte, R.R., Bolinger, L., Kneeland, J.B., Reddy, R., Leigh, J.S. (1999). A novel approach to observing articular cartilage deformation in vitro via magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 9, 653-662.

  • Eckstein, F., Tieschky, M., Faber, S., Englmeier, K.H., Reiser, M. (1999). Functional analysis of articular cartilage deformation, recovery, and fluid flow following dynamic exercise in vivo. Anatomy and Embryology, 200, 419-424.

  • Juras, V., Szomolanyi, P., Majdisova, Z., Tratttnig, S. (2008). MR-compatible compression device for in-vitro evaluation of biomechanical properties of cartilage. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, 3, 200-208.

  • Markwardt, C.B. (2008). Non-linear least squares fitting in IDL with MPFIT. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII: Proceedings. Vol. 411. Quebec, Canada: ASP, 251-254.

  • Hayes, W.C., Keer, L.M., Herrmann, G., Mockros, L.F. (1972). A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. Journal of Biomechanics, 5, 541-51.

  • Wong, M., Carter, D.R. (2003). Articular cartilage functional histomorphology and mechanobiology: a research perspective. Bone, 33, 1-13.

  • Eckstein, F., Tieschky, M., Faber, S.C., Haubner, M., Kolem, H., Englmeier, K.H., Reiser, M. (1998). Effect of physical exercise on cartilage volume and thickness in vivo: MR imaging study. Radiology, 207, 243-248.

  • Mosher, T.J., Smith, H.E., Collins, C., Liu, Y., Hancy, J., Dardzinski, B.J., Smith, M.B. (2005). Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study. Radiology, 234, 245-9.

  • Burstein, D., Velyvis, J., Scott, K.T., Stock, K.W., Kim, Y.J., Jaramillo, D., Boutin, R.D., Gray, M.L. (2001). Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 45, 36-41.

  • Mlynarik, V., Sulzbacher, I., Bittsansky, M., Fuiko, R., Trattnig, S. (2003). Investigation of apparent diffusion constant as an indicator of early degenerative disease in articular cartilage. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 17, 440-444.


Journal + Issues