Measuring and evaluating the differences of compared images for a correct car silhouette categorization using integral transforms

Open access

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the analysis of the possibilities of using integral transforms for measuring and evaluating the differences of compared images (car silhouettes) with the purpose of a correct car body categorization. Approaches such as the light intensities frequency change, the application of discrete integral transforms without the use of further supplementary information enabling automated data processing using the Fourier-Mellin transforms are used within this work. The calculation of the several metrics was verified through different combinations that implied using and not using the Hamming window and a low-pass filter. The paper introduced a method for measuring and evaluating the differences in the compared images (car silhouettes). The proposed method relies on the fact that the integral transforms have their own transformants in the case of translation, scaling and rotation, in the frequency area. Besides, the Fourier-Mellin transform was to offer image transformation that is resistant to the translation, rotation and scale.

[1] Stylidis, K., Wickman, C., Söderberg, R. (2015). Defining perceived quality in the automotive industry: An engineering approach. Procedia CIRP, 36 (2015), 165-170.

[2] Bogue, R. (2013). Robotic vision boosts automotive industry quality and productivity. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 40 (5), 415-419.

[3] Di Leo, G., Liguori, C., Pietrosanto, A., Sommella, P. (2017). A vision system for the online quality monitoring of industrial manufacturing. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 89, 162-168.

[4] Ružarovský, R., Delgado Sobrino, D.R., Holubek, R., Košťál, P. (2014). Automated in-process inspection method in the flexible production system iCIM 3000. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 693, 50-55.

[5] Božek, P., Pivarčiová, E. (2013). Flexible manufacturing system with automatic control of product quality. Strojarstvo, 55 (3), 211-221.

[6] Mery, D., Jaeger, T., Filbert, D. (2002). A review of methods for automated recognition of casting defects. http://www.academia.edu/20111824/A_review_of_methods_for_automated_recognition_of_casting_defects.

[7] Świłło, S.J., Perzyk, M. (2013). Surface casting defects inspection using vision system and neural network techniques. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 13 (4).

[8] Dhillon, B.S. (2009). Human Reliability, Error, and Human Factors in Engineering Maintenance. CRC Press.

[9] Huang, S.-H., Pan, Y-Ch. (2015). Automated visual inspection in the semiconductor industry: A survey. Computers in Industry, 66, 1-10.

[10] Frankovský, P., Ostertag, O., Trebuňa, F., Ostertagová, E., Kelemen, M. (2016). Methodology of contact stress analysis of gearwheel by means of experimental photoelasticity. Applied Optics, 55 (18), 4856-4864.

[11] Kováč, J., Ďurovský, F., Hajduk, M. (2014). Utilization of virtual reality connected with robotized system. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 613, 273-278.

[12] Frankovský, P., Hroncová, D., Delyová, I., Hudák, P. (2012). Inverse and forward dynamic analysis of two link manipulator. Procedia Engineering, 48, 158-163.

[13] Abramov, I.V., Nikitin, Yu.R., Abramov, A.I., Sosnovich, E.V., Božek, P. (2014). Control and diagnostic model of brushless DC motor. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 65 (5), 277- 282.

[14] Jena, D.B., Kuma, R. (2011). Implementation of wavelet denoising and image morphology on welding image for estimating HAZ and welding defect. Measurement Science Review, 11, (4).

[15] Neogi, N. Mohanta, K.D., Dutta, K.P. (2014). Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2014 (50).

[16] Ito, K., Nakajima, H., Kobayashi, K., Aoki, T., Higuchi, T. (2004). A fingerprint matching algorithm using Phase-Only Correlation. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, E87-A (3), 682-691.

[17] Carl Zeiss Ltd. (2018). 3D inline measuring technology from ZEISS. https://www.zeiss.co.uk.

[18] Druckmüller, M., Antoš, M., Druckmüllerová, H. (2005). Mathematical methods for visualization of the solar corona. Jemná mechanika a optika, 10, 302-304.

[19] van den Dool, R. (2004). Fourier and Mellin Transform. Image Processing Tools. www.scribd.com/doc/9480198/Tools-Fourier-Mellin-Transform.

[20] Derrode, S., Ghorbel, F. (2001). Robust and efficient Fourier-Mellin transform approximations for graylevel image reconstruction and complete invariant description. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 83 (1), 57-78.

[21] Gueham, M., Bouridane, A., Crookes, D. (2007). Automatic recognition of partial shoeprints based on phase-only correlation. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, Vol. 4, 441-444.

[22] Chen, Q.S. (1993). Image registration and its applications in medical imaging. Dissertation work, Vrije University, Brussels, Belgium.

[23] Slížik, J., Harťanský, R. (2012). Metrology of electromagnetic intensity measurement in near field. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 17 (1), 57-66.

[24] Hallon, J., Kováč, K., Bittera, M. (2018). Comparison of coupling networks for EFT Pulses Injection. Przeglad elektrotechniczny, 94 (2), 17-20.

[25] Harťanský, R., Smieško, V., Rafaj, M. (2017). Modifying and accelerating the method of moments calculation. Computing and Informatics, 36 (3), 664-682.

Measurement Science Review

The Journal of Institute of Measurement Science of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.345
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.253



CiteScore 2017: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.441
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.936

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 38 38 17
PDF Downloads 34 34 12