Measuring Software Test Verification for Complex Workpieces based on Virtual Gear Measuring Instrument

Open access


Validity and correctness test verification of the measuring software has been a thorny issue hindering the development of Gear Measuring Instrument (GMI). The main reason is that the software itself is difficult to separate from the rest of the measurement system for independent evaluation. This paper presents a Virtual Gear Measuring Instrument (VGMI) to independently validate the measuring software. The triangular patch model with accurately controlled precision was taken as the virtual workpiece and a universal collision detection model was established. The whole process simulation of workpiece measurement is implemented by VGMI replacing GMI and the measuring software is tested in the proposed virtual environment. Taking involute profile measurement procedure as an example, the validity of the software is evaluated based on the simulation results; meanwhile, experiments using the same measuring software are carried out on the involute master in a GMI. The experiment results indicate a consistency of tooth profile deviation and calibration results, thus verifying the accuracy of gear measuring system which includes the measurement procedures. It is shown that the VGMI presented can be applied in the validation of measuring software, providing a new ideal platform for testing of complex workpiece-measuring software without calibrated artifacts.

[1] Acko, B., Mccarthy, M., Haertig, F., Buchmeister, B. (2012). Standards for testing freeform measurement capability of optical and tactile coordinate measuring machines. Measurement Science & Technology, 23 (9), 94013-94025.

[2] Frazer, R.C. (2007). Measurement uncertainty in gear metrology. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, UK.

[3] Greif, N. (2006). Software testing and preventive quality assurance for metrology. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 28 (3), 286-296.

[4] Nieciąg, H. (2012). The assessment of the criterion in tests of acceptance type of the metrological software in coordinate measuring systems. In 10th International Scientific Conference “Coordinate Measuring Technique”, 23-25 April, 2012, Bielsko-Biała, Poland.

[5] Greif, N., Richter, D. (2009). Software validation and preventive software quality assurance for metrology. In Data Modeling for Metrology and Testing in Measurement Science. Birkhäuser Basel, 1-41.

[6] Härtig, F., Rost, K., Goch, G. (2010). Large gear material standard for the traceability of gears for transmission manufacturing. In International Conference on Gears, 4-6 October, 2010, Technical University of Munich, Germany, 991-1004.

[7] Komori, M., Takeoka, F., Kondo, K., Kondo, Y., Takatsuji, T., Osawa, S., Kubo, A. (2010). Design method of double ball artifact for use in evaluating the accuracy of a gear-measuring instrument. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132 (7), 071010.

[8] Levenson, M.S. (2000). Performance measures for geometric fitting in the NIST algorithm testing and evaluation program for coordinate measurement systems. Journal of Research of NIST, 100 (5), 563-574.

[9] Nieciąg, H. (2015). Improvement of simulation method in validation of software of the coordinate measuring systems. Measurement Science Review, 15 (5), 226-235.

[10] Zhang, R.J., Wang, G.J. (2008). The sharp upper bound on the distance between a parametric patch and its interpolated triangle. Science in China, Series F: Information Sciences, 51 (2), 113-119.

[11] Sladek, J.A. (2016). Coordinate Metrology: Accuracy of Systems and Measurements. Springer.

[12] Frank, H. (2007). Necessity and benefit of certified software--practical experience gained with commercial involute gear evaluation software. In PTB-BIPM Workshop on the Impact of Information Technology in Metrology, 5-7 June, 2007, Berlin, Germany.

[13] International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM) - Part 6: Estimation of Errors in Computing Gaussian Associated Features. ISO 10360-6.

[14] Taguchi, T., Kondo, Y. (2016). Evaluation of a high-precision gear measuring machine for helix measurement using helix and wedge artifacts. Measurement Science & Technology, 27 (8), 084008.

[15] Wäldele, F., Bittner, B., Busch, K., Drieschner, R., Elligsen, R. (1993). Testing of coordinate measuring machine software. Precision Engineering, 15 (2), 121-123.

[16] Takeoka, F., Komori, M., Takahashi, M., Kubo, A., Takatsuji, T., Osawa, S. (2009). Gear checker analysis and evaluation using a virtual gear checker. Measurement Science & Technology, 20 (4), 1-11.

[17] Wichmann, B.A., Cox, M.G. (1992). Problems and strategies for software component testing standards. Software Testing Verification & Reliability, 2 (4), 167-185.

Measurement Science Review

The Journal of Institute of Measurement Science of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.345
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.253

CiteScore 2017: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.441
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.936


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 169 169 20
PDF Downloads 85 85 14