Multiple Iterations of Bundle Adjustment for the Position Measurement of Fiber Tips on LAMOST

Open access

Abstract

In the astronomical observation process of multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope, the position measurement of fiber tips on the focal plane is difficult and critical, and is directly related to subsequent observation and ultimate data quality. The fibers should precisely align with the celestial target. Hence, the precise coordinates of the fiber tips are obligatory for tracking the celestial target. The accurate movement trajectories of the fiber tips on the focal surface of the telescope are the critical problem for the control of the fiber positioning mechanism. According to the special structure of the LAMOST telescope and the composition of the initial position error, this paper aims at developing a high precision and robust measurement method based on multiple iterations of bundle adjustment with a few control points. The measurement theory of the proposed methodology has been analyzed, and the measurement accuracy has been evaluated. The experimental results indicate that the new method is more accurate and more reliable than the polynomial fitting method. The maximum position error of the novel measurement algorithm of fiber tips with simulated and real data is 65.3 μm, and most of the position errors conform to the accuracy requirement (40 μm).

[1] Gillingham, P.R. (1989). Lessons for new large telescopes from the AAT. Astrophysics and Space Science, 160 (1), 281-286.

[2] Kent, S.M. (1994). Sloan digital sky survey. Astrophysics and Space Science, 217 (1), 27-30.

[3] Xing, X.Z., Zhai, C., Du, H.S., Li, W.M., Hu, H.Z., Wang, R.F., Shi, D.X. (1998). Parallel controllable optical fiber positioning system for LAMOST. In Advanced Technology Optical / IR Telescopes VI, Proc. SPIE 3352, 839-849.

[4] Edelstein, J., Poppett, C., Sirk, M., Besuner, R., Lafever, R., Allington-Smith, J.R., Murray, G.J. (2012). Optical fiber systems for the BigBOSS instrument. In Modern Technologies in Space-and Ground-Based Telescopes and Instrumentation II, Proc. SPIE 8450.

[5] Predmore, C.R. (2010). Bundle adjustment of multiposition measurements using the Mahalanobis distance. Precision Engineering, 34 (1), 113-123.

[6] Zhang, F.M., Qu, X.H. (2012). Fusion estimation of point sets from multiple stations of spherical coordinate instruments utilizing uncertainty estimation based on monte carlo. Measurement Science Review, 12 (2), 40-45.

[7] D’Amato, R., Caja, J., Maresca, P., Gómez, E. (2014). Use of coordinate measuring machine to measure angles by geometric characterization of perpendicular planes. Estimating uncertainty. Measurement, 47, 598-606.

[8] Shi, Y.Q., Sun, C.K., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Duan, H.X. (2011). High-speed measurement algorithm for the position of holes in a large plane. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 50 (12), 1828-1835.

[9] Feng, M.C., Jin, Y., Zhai, C. (2011). Embedded realtime strain measurement system based on improved automated grid method. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 32 (12), 2874-2880.

[10] Janusek, D., Kania, M., Zaczek, R., Zavala-Fernandez, H., Zbiec, A., Opolski, G., Maniewski, R. (2011). Application of wavelet based denoising for T-wave alternans analysis in high resolution ECG maps. Measurement Science Review, 11 (6), 181-184.

[11] Liu, Z.G., Zhai, C., Hu, H.Z., Wang, J.P., Chu, J.R. (2011). Research on calibration method of LAMOST fiber robot. In Astronomical Adaptive Optics Systems and Applications IV, Proc. SPIE 8149.

[12] Wang, M.X., Zhao, Y.H., Luo, A. (2012). LAMOST fiber unit positional precision passive detection exploiting the technique of template matching. In Modern Technologies in Space- and Ground-Based : Telescopes and Instrumentation II, Proc. SPIE 8450.

[13] Barone, S., Paoli, A., Razionale, A.V. (2013). Multiple alignments of range maps by active stereo imaging and global marker framing. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 51 (2), 116-127.

[14] Guidi, G., Beraldin, J.A., Ciofi, S., Atzeni, C. (2003). Fusion of range camera and photogrammetry: A systematic procedure for improving 3-D models metric accuracy. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 33 (4), 667-676.

[15] Tao, C.V., Hu, Y. (2001). A comprehensive study of the rational function model for photogrammetric processing. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67 (12), 1347-1357.

[16] Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P., Hartley, R., Fitzgibbon, A. (2000). Bundle adjustment-a modern synthesis. Vision Algorithms: Theory Practice, 1883, 298-372.

[17] Lourakis, M.I.A., Argyros, A.A. (2009). SBA: A software package for generic sparse bundle adjustment. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 36 (1), 1-30.

[18] Luhmann, T. (2010). Close range photogrammetry for industrial applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (6), 558-569.

[19] Mouragnon, E., Lhuillier, M., Dhome, M., Dekeyser, F., Sayd, P. (2009). Generic and real-time structure from motion using local bundle adjustment. Image and Vision Computing, 27 (8), 1178-1193.

[20] Agarwal, S., Snavely, N., Seitz, S., Szeliski, R. (2010). Bundle adjustment in the large. In Computer Vision - ECCV 2010, LNCS 6312, 29-42.

[21] Ji, Z., Boutin, M., Aliaga, D.G. (2006). Robust bundle adjustment for structure from motion. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, 2185-2188.

[22] Marquardt, D. (1963). An algorithm for the leastsquares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 11 (2), 431-441.

[23] Zhang, Y.Z. (2000). A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22 (11), 1330-1334.

[24] Tsai, M.J., Hung, C.C. (2005). Development of a highprecision surface metrology system using structured light projection. Measurement, 38 (3), 236-247.

[25] Tsai, R.Y. (1987). A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 3 (4), 323-344.

[26] Huang, J.J., Wang, Z., Gao, Z.H., Gao, J.M. (2011). A novel color coding method for structured light 3D measurement. In Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XI, Proc. SPIE 8085.

[27] Weng, J., Cohen, P., Henriou, M. (1992). Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14 (10), 965-980.

[28] Hartley, R.I. (1997). In defense of the eight-point algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19 (6), 580-593.

[29] Menudet, J.F., Becker, J.M., Fournel, T., Mennessier, C. (2008). Plane-based camera self-calibration by metric rectification of images. Image and Vision Computing, 26 (7), 913-934.

[30] Debei, S., Aboudan, A., Colombatti, G., Pertile, M. (2012). Lutetia surface reconstruction and uncertainty analysis. Planetary and Space Science, 71 (1), 64-72.

[31] Feng, M.C., Gu, Y.G., Zhai, C. (2013). Precise measurement of fibers position using bundle adjustment algorithm. In IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. IEEE, 576-580.

Measurement Science Review

The Journal of Institute of Measurement Science of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.345
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.253



CiteScore 2017: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.441
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.936

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 62 62 25
PDF Downloads 13 13 7