Analysis of Risk Factors for Underground Coal Gasification

Open access


The purpose of this article is to determine the environmental impacts of underground gasification on the population and to analyze the risk of underground coal gasification (UCG) activities using selected risk assessment methods. Coal gas is a regular part of coal deposits and its extraction also allows the use of coal deposits that cannot be extracted by traditional methods. These technologies bring both positive and negative aspects. The paper points out the risk analysis, hazard identification and assessment during the operation of UCG technology using a risk graph and a risk matrix. Identified risks to workers that cannot be reduced should be taken into consideration and appropriate safeguard should be used. For each risk, it is necessary to inform employees about regular education and training. From worldwide experience with this technology, it is possible to analyze risks in Slovakia. Actual gasification produces polluting gases such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, hydrogen sulphide, nitrogen oxides, tar and ash, and creates a risk that may occur on and under the surface of the site depending on the geological and hydrogeological structure of the deposits. Possible measures to mitigate the adverse effects are proposed for the implementation of this technology. Coal is still one of the main domestic primary energy sources. Currently, only 5 out of 19 deposits in the Slovak Republic are used. Underground gasification could increase the use of Slovak coal and brown coal deposits.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Burchart-Korol D. Krawczyk P. Czaplicka-Kolarz K. Eco-efficiency of underground coal gasification (UCG) for electricity production FUEL 2016 173.

  • [2] Białecka B. Estimation of coal reserves for UCG in the upper silesian coal Basin. Natural Resources Research. 17 (1) 2008 21-28.

  • [3] Brown K. M. In situ coal gasification. An emerging technology Journal Am. Soc. Min. Reclam 2012 (1)

  • [4] Mocek P.; Pieszczek M.; Swiadrowski J.; Kapusta K.; Wiatowski M.; Stanczyk K. Pilot-scale underground coal gasification (UCG) experiment in an operating Mine “Wieczorek” in Poland. Energy 2016 111 313-321.

  • [5] Sasvari T. Blišťanová M. Kondela J. Pinka J. Sidorová M. Škvareková E. Vizi L. Wittenberger G. Possibility of obtaining energy of gas from coal deposits. ES TU FBERG 2007.

  • [6] Uppal A. A. Bhatti A. I. Aamir E. Samar R. Khan S. A. Control oriented modeling and optimization of one dimensional packed bed model of underground coal gasification. Journal of Process Control Elsevier 2014 1(24).

  • [7] Doucet D. Perkins G. Ulbrich A. du Toit E. Production of power using underground coal gasification Energy Sources Part A: Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects 2016 38(24) 3653-3660.

  • [8] Lin X. Zuotang W. Wengang H. Guojun K. Xuefeng L. Peng Z. Jianhua W. Temperature field distribution of burnt surrounding rock in UCG stope. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology Elsevier 2014 24.

  • [9] Bhutto A. W. Bazmi A. A. Zahedi G.Underground coal gasification: From fundamentals to applications Progress in Energy and Combustion Science Pergamon 2013 1(39).

  • [10] Škvareková E. Bakalár T. Impact of gas extraction from coal deposits on the environment SGEM Sofia STEF92 Technology Ltd. 2011 795-800.

  • [11] Schiffrin D.J. The feasibility of in situ geological sequestration of supercritical carbon dioxide coupled to underground coal gasification Energy and Environmental Science 2016 8(8) 2330-2340.

  • [12] Khan Md.M. Joseph P. Mmbaga Ahad S. Shirazi Qingzia Liu and Rajender Gupta. Modelling Underground Coal Gasification. Energies 2015 8(11) 12603-12668;

  • [13] Ding T. Ning Y. Zhang Y. The Contribution of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment (OFDI) to the Reduction of Global CO2 Emissions.

  • [14] Burton E. Friedmann J. Upadhye R. Best Practices in Underground Coal Gasification. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 2014.

  • [15] Oravec M. Balážiková M. Tomašková M. Influence of the working environment on safety and health protection at work and of the employees in an office space Science Business Society 20183(3).

  • [16] Pačaiová H. Markulik Š. Turisová R. Nagyová A. How to Build Risk-based Thinking Methodology Based on Process Approach. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering the Technical University in Košice 2018 22(1).

  • [17] Zelenák Š. Škvareková E. Underground gasification of coal in mining area Cígeľ geological and hydrogeological conditions Odpadové forum OZE Praha 2012.

  • [18] Sinay J. Pačaiová H. Integration model of safety and security as a part of integrated safety Future Security Freiburg Fraunhofer 2016.

  • [19] Sinay J. Training Consulting and Certification Center for risk management in machine safety occupational health and safety and environmental risks. Potential and services of USP Technicom for efficient development of entrepreneurship and research collaboration with industry Elfa Košice 2015.

  • [20] Dubiński J. Turek M. Mining problems of underground coal gasification-Reflections based on experience gained in experiment conducted in KHW S.A. Wieczorek coal mine Mining Science 2016 23 7-20.

  • [21] Čech J. Šofranko M. Economic Projection and Evaluation of Mining Venture E & M Economics and Management Liberec Czech Republic 2018 21(2).

  • [22] Group Authors. EEA European Environment Agency. Renewable Energy in Europe 2017. Recent Growth and Knock - on Effects EEA Report No 3/2017 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 2017.

  • [23] Ekneligoda T.C. Marshall A.M. A coupled thermal-mechanical numerical model of underground coal gasification (UCG) including spontaneous coal combustion and its effects International Journal of Coal Geology 2018 199 31-38.

  • [24] Sidorova M Beysembayev K. M Shmanov M. N. Kanat K. M. and Aizat M. E. Plastic Flow Modeling in Rock Fracture Acta Montanistica Slovaca 2018 23(4).

  • [25] Kačur J. Durdán M. Laciak M.Flegner P. Impact analysis of the oxidant in the process of underground coal gasification. Measurement Elsevier 2014 1(51).

  • [26] Act. 124/2006 NR SR on safety and health at work and on amendments to certain laws.

  • [27] Bakalár T. Pavolova H. Khouri S. Pristášová I. Influence of additives on decrease of temperature of slag flow from energy coal in wet bottom boiler Metalurgija 2017 3-4 (56).

  • [28] Tomašková M. Risk assessment and their quantification 2013 3 (11).

  • [29] Kapusta K. Wiatowski M. Stanczyk K. An experimental ex-situ study of the suitability of a high moisture ortho-lignite for underground coal gasification (UCG) process FUEL 2016 179.

  • [30] Tianhong D. Zuotang W. Limin Z. Dongdong L. Gas production strategy of underground coal gasification based on multiple gas sources Scientific World Journal 2016.

  • [31] Hammond G. P.Waldron R. (): Risk assessment of UK electricity supply in a rapidly evolving energy sector Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers Parta. Journal of Power and Energy 2008 222 (A7) Special Issue.

  • [32] Laciak M. Kostúr K. Durdán M. Kačur J. Flegner P. The analysis of the underground coal gasification in experimental equipment Energy 2016 114 332-343.

  • [33] Perkins G. Underground coal gasification – Part I: Field demonstrations and process performance Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2018 67 158-187.

  • [34] Taušová M. Rybárová J. Khouri S. Financial analysis as a marketing tool in the process of raising awareness on renewable energy Acta Montanistica Slovaca 2007 12

Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 81 81 20
PDF Downloads 133 133 19