Safety Management of Water Economy. Case Study of the Water and Sewerage Company

Janusz Karwot 1  and Józef Ober 2
  • 1 Sewage and Water Supply Ltd, , Rybnik
  • 2 Silesian University of Technology,

Abstract

This study addresses the issues of water management safety management in the context of shaping the appropriate level of municipal services in Poland, related to quality standards and the availability of water resources for enterprises and the local community. The literature review presents examples of activities concerning the evaluation of the quality and availability of groundwater and their suitability for domestic and commercial use in the world. The key parameters of water intended for human consumption, which affect its quality, have been selected based on the literature and the Polish standards set out in the regulation. On this basis, appropriate parameters for case-study research were selected. In the following, the analytical methods and tools used to assess water quality were characterized. In the case study example, the analysis of water parameters from selected three different intakes in 2015-2017 (Tęczowa, Stodoły and GPW Rybnik-Północ) was performed and the functioning and role of the internal Water and Sewage Laboratory in the safety management of water economy in the water and sewerage company has been presented.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] J. Alcamo. (2019, Feb.). „Water quality and its interlinkages with the Sustainable Development Goals”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Vol. 36, pp. 126-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.005.

  • [2] R. Barik, S.K. Pattanayak. (2019, Apr.). „Assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation of green spaces in the Rourkela city of Odisha, India”. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. Vol. 8, pp. 428-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.01.005.

  • [3] G. Bełz. „Kształtowanie nowoczesnego systemu zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym” in Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Uwarunkowania funkcjonowania i współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. P. Chudziński, Ed. Warszawa: PWE, 2018, pp.185-202.

  • [4] R. Brouwer, C.M. Ordens, R. Pinto, M.T. Condesso de Melo. (2018, May). „Economic valuation of groundwater protection using a groundwater quality ladder based on chemical threshold levels”. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 88, pp. 292-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.041.

  • [5] D. Carstens, R. Armer. (2019, Feb.). „Spatio-temporal analysis of urban changes and surface water quality”. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 569, pp. 720-734. DOI: 10.1016/j.hydrol.2018.12.033.

  • [6] P. Chudziński. „Charakterystyka przedsiębiorstw wodociągowych w Polsce” in Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Uwarunkowania funkcjonowania i współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. P. Chudziński, Ed. Warszawa: PWE, 2018, pp.17-38.

  • [7] S. Cyfert. „Zarządzanie strategiczne i strategie” in Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem wodociągowym. Uwarunkowania funkcjonowania i współczesne koncepcje zarządzania. P. Chudziński, Ed. Warszawa: PWE, 2018, pp. 135-150.

  • [8] R. Gupta, A.K. Misra. (2018, Mar.). „Groundwater quality analysis quaternary aquifers in Jhajjar District, Haryana, India: Focus on groundwater fluoride and health implications”. Alexandria Engineering Journal. Vol. 57, pp. 375-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.08.031.

  • [9] G. Kądzielawski. „Woda – palący problem”. Fede. Fundacja Energia dla Europy (Jan. 07, 2013).

  • [10] Khanoranga, S. Khalid. (2019, Feb.). „An assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation and drinking purposes around brick kilns in three districts of Balochistan province, Pakistan, through water quality index and multivariate statistical approaches”. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. Vol. 197, pp. 14-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.11.007.

  • [11] Z. Kundzewicz, M. Zalewski, A. Kędziora, E. Pierzgalski. (2010). „Zagrożenia związane z wodą”. Nauka. Vol. 4, pp. 87-96.

  • [12] J.G. Leveque, R.C. Burns. (2019, Mar.). „Water quality perceptions and natural resources Extraction: A matter of geography?” Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 234, pp. 379-386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.126.

  • [13] F. Muzenda, M. Masocha, S.N. Misi. (2019, Feb.). „Ground-water quality assessment using a water quality index and GIS: A case of Ushewokunze Settlement, Harare, Zimbabwe”. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2019.02.011.

  • [14] T.T. Nguyen, H.H. Ngo, W. Guo, X.C. Wang, N.Ren, G. Li, J. Ding, H. Liang. (2019, Feb.). „Implementation of a specific urban water management – Sponge City”. Science of The Total Environment. Vol. 652, pp. 147-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168.

  • [15] PWiK Rybnik. The Internet: www.pwik-rybnik.pl/laboratorium.html, [Nov. 27, 2018].

  • [16] E. Radzka, J. Jankowska. (2015). „Struktura organizacyjna i zarządzanie gospodarką wodną w Polsce”. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach. Seria Administracja i Zarządzanie. Vol. 106, pp. 185-193.

  • [17] Regulation of the Minister of Health of 7 December 2017 (Dz. U. of 2017 item 2294).

  • [18] T. Strzelecki. „Zarządzanie wodami w oparciu o doświadczenie grupy SUEZ”. Perspektywy i wyzwania gospodarki wodnej w świetle nowego prawa wodnego. Materiały pokonferencyjne. (Nov. 28, 2017), p. 17.

  • [19] Act on Collective Water Supply and Collective Sewage Disposal (Dz. U. of 2017 item 328).

  • [20] S. Zereg, A. Boudoukha, L. Benaabidate. (2018, Nov.). „Impacts of natural conditions and anthropogenic activities on groundwater quality in Tebessa plain, Algeria”. Sustainable Environment Research. Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 340-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.serj.2018.05.003.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search