Ecological Growth Boundaries

Open access

Abstract

The trends of the society for the continuous growth, combined with the demographic changes, today have led to the important ecological problems on a global scale, which include, among others: the increased use of non-renewable natural resources, an increase of the greenhouse gas emissions, contamination of soil, water, air and the progressive degradation of ecosystems. In the face of such serious threats the global initiatives of all countries are important to limit the results of the excessive consumption. The aim of the article is to present the methods of measurement of the consumption level of natural resources by the societies and the examination of relationships between the level of development of the societies and the use of resources. The popular measure – the ecological footprint – was used as a measurement method for the consumption of the today’s generations in relation to the regenerative possibilities of the natural environment. On the other hand, as the assessment method for the level of development of societies – the Human Development Index (HDI), including three basic areas: the life expectancy, GDP level per capita and education was used. The results of the research indicate that the current trend of the unlimited consumption of the highly developed countries takes place at the expense of the future generations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] L.S. David. L. Duckstein. “Multicriterion ranking of alternative long-range water resources systems” Water Resources Bulletin vol. 12 pp. 731-754 1976.

  • [2] J. Dubiński. M. Turek. „Szanse i zagrożenia rozwoju górnictwa węgla kamiennego w Polsce”. in Wiadomości Górnicze nr 11 pp. 626-633 2012.

  • [3] J.A. Foley et al. (2011 Oct). “Solutions for a cultivated planet”. Nature [On-line]. vol. 478 pp. 337-342. Available: http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/courses/OCN310_2/Fall14/files/essay4/foley.pdf [Jun.1 2015]

  • [4] S. Burns. M. Wackernagel. “Footprint-Annual Report 2012”. Global Footprint Network. Internet: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/article_uploads/2012_Annual_Report.pdf 2012 [Jun. 1 2015]

  • [5] L. Kłos. „Ślad ekologiczny jako nieekonomiczny miernik jakości życia społeczeństwa”. Available: http://www.ue.katowice.pl/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/6_L.Klos__Slad_ekologiczny_jako_nieekonomiczny_miernik....pdf [June. 15 2015]

  • [6] J. Makowski. Geografia fizyczna świata. Warszawa PWN 2007 s. 302.

  • [7] I. Sachs. “Eco-development: a definition” Ambio vol. 8 no 2-3 pp. 111-113 1979.

  • [8] J. Słonimiec. P. Szatkowska. N. Stępień. J. Urban. S. Dobosz. G. Biernacki. JI. Han Yeon. „Stan realizacji celów zintegrowanej polityki produktowej w Polsce na tle pozostałych krajów Unii Europejskiej”. in Management System in Production Engineering No 4(20) 2015. DOI 10.12914/MSPE-01-04-2015

  • [9] M.K. Tolba. Development without Destruction: Evolving Environmental Perceptions. Dublin: Tycooly Publishing 1976.

  • [10] WCED Our Common Future London: Oxford University Press 1987.

  • [11] W. Wilczyńska-Michalik. K. Świder. „Założenia koncepcji Ekologicznego Śladu i przykłady obliczeń dla dużych miast”. Studia Geographica I pp. 103-125 2010.

  • [12] World Conservation Strategy. Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development IUCN-NDP-WWF. Internet: https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/WCS-004.pdf 1980 [Jun. 15 2015].

  • [13] Internet: http://ulicaekologiczna.pl/zdrowy-styl-zycia/slad-ekologiczny-%E2%80%93-koszt-naszego-bycia-naziemi/ Jul.5 2011 [Jul. 15 2015]

  • [14] Living Planet Report: Biodiversity biocapacity and better choices. Internet: http://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/WWF_LPR_2012.pdf 2012 [Jul. 15 2015]

  • [15] Internet: www.footprintnetwork.org/atlas [Jul. 5 2015]

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 135 57 3
PDF Downloads 65 34 2