Metrological Aspects of Abrasive Tool Active Surface Topography Evaluation

Open access


Analysis of the shape and location of abrasive grain tips as well as their changes during the grinding process, is the basis for forecasting the machining process results. This paper presents a methodology of using the watershed segmentation in identifying abrasive grains on the abrasive tool active surface. Some abrasive grain tips were selected to minimize the errors of detecting many tips on a single abrasive grain. The abrasive grains, singled out as a result of the watershed segmentation, were then analyzed to determine their geometric parameters. Moreover, the statistical parameters describing their locations on the abrasive tool active surface and the parameters characterizing intergranular spaces were determined.


  • [1] Kacalak, W., Tandecka, K. (2012). Effect of superfinishing methods kinematic features on the machined surface. Journal of Machine Engineering, 12(4), 35−48.

  • [2] Kacalak, W., Tandecka, K., (2012). Basics of forecasting superfinishing results be the diamond lapping films. Journal of Machine Engineering, 12(4), 49−62.

  • [3] Rowe, W.B. (2009). Principles of modern grinding technology. William Andrew, Elsevier.

  • [4] Marinescu, I.D., Hitchiner, M., Uhlmann, W., Rowe, W.B., Inasaki, I. (2007). Handbook of machining with grinding wheels. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • [5] Nadolny, K.(2015). Wear phenomena of grinding wheels with sol-gel alumina abrasive grains and glassceramic vitrified bond during internal cylindrical traverse grinding of 100Cr6 steel. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing, 77(1), 83−98.

  • [6] Lipiński, D., Kacalak, W. (2007. Assessment of the accuracy of the process of ceramics grinding with the use of fuzzy interference. Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4431, 596−603.

  • [7] Blunt, L., Ebdon, S. (1996). The application of three-dimensional surface measurement techniques to characterizing grinding wheel topography. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 36, 1207−1226.

  • [8] Matsuno, Y., Yamada, H., Harada, M., Kobayashi, A. (1975). Microtopography of the grinding wheel surface with SEM. Annals of the CIRP, 24, 237-242.

  • [9] Lachance, S., Warkentin, A., Bauer, R.J. (2003). Development of an automated system for measuring grinding wheel wear flats. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 22, 130-135.

  • [10] Yan, L., Rong, Y.M., Feng, J., Zhi, X.Z. (2011). Three-dimension surface characterization of grinding wheel using white light interferometer. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 55, 133-141.

  • [11] Chen, X., Brian Rowe, W. (1996). Analysis and simulation of the grinding process. Part I: generation of the grinding wheel surface. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 36, 871-882.

  • [12] Koshy, P., Ives, L.K., Jahanmir, S. (1999). Simulation of diamond-ground surfaces. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 39, 1451-1470.

  • [13] Cooper, W.L. (2000). Grinding process size effect and kinematics numerical analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 122(1), 59-69.

  • [14] Zhou, X, Xi, F. (2002). Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42, 969-977.

  • [15] Nguyen, T.A., Butler, D.L. (2005). Simulation of precision grinding process. Part I: generation of the grinding wheel surface. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45, 1321-1328.

  • [16] Xie, J., Xu, J., Tang, Y., Tamaki, J. (2008). 3D graphical evaluation of micron-scale protrusion topography of diamond grinding wheel. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48, 1254-1260.

  • [17] Xie, J., Tamaki, J. (2006). In-process evaluation of grit protrusion feature for fine diamond grinding wheel by means of electro-contact discharge dressing. Journal of Materials Proc. Technology, 180(1−3), 83−90.

  • [18] Nguyen, A.T., Butler, D.L. (2008). Correlation of grinding wheel topography and grinding performance: a study from a viewpoint of three-dimensional surface characterization. Journal of Materials Proc. Technology, 208, 14-23.

  • [19] Darafon, A. (2013). Measuring and modelling of grinding wheel topography. Ph.D. Thesis. Dalhousie University, Halifax.

  • [20] Bazan, A., Kawalec, A., Krok, M., Chmielik, I.P. (2014). The analysis of selected parameters of grains of CBN grinding wheels. Mechanik, 87(8−9), 49−57.

  • [21] Xie, J., Wei, F., Zheng, J.H., Tamaki, J., Kubo, A. (2011). 3D laser investigation on micron-scale grain protrusion topography of truncated diamond grinding wheel for precision grinding performance. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 51, 411-419.

  • [22] Soille, P. (2004). Morphological image analysis: principles and applications. Springer-Verlag.

  • [23] Blunt, L., Jiang, X. (2003). Advanced techniques for assessment surface topography. Kogan Page Science.

  • [24] Lonardo, P.M., Trumpold, H., De Chiffre, L. (1996). Progress in 3D surface microtopography characterization. Annals of the CIRP, 45, 589-598.

  • [25] Lipiński, D., Kacalak, W., Tomkowski, R. (2014). Methodology of evaluation of abrasive tool wear with the use of laser scanning microscopy. Scanning, 36(1), 53-63,

  • [26] Beucher, S., Meyer, F. (1999). The morphological approach to segmentation: the watershed transformation. Dougherty, E.R (ed). Mathematical morphology in image processing. SPIE i IEEE Presses, Bellingham, WA, 433−481.

  • [27] Wu, Q., Merchant, F.A., Castleman, K.R. (2008). Microscope image processing. Elsevier

Metrology and Measurement Systems

The Journal of Committee on Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.598

CiteScore 2016: 1.58

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.228


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 16 16 9
PDF Downloads 2 2 0