Open access


Tall buildings present some specific aspects influencing the modeling and response to seismic loads. Therefore, the design rules recommended in codes, calibrated for low and medium rise buildings, are not appropriate for design of tall buildings. Other rules are needed, and performance based design represents a viable alternative for tall buildings. In this paper a methodology for the design of tall structures is proposed and it is illustrated trough a case study for a structure with perimeter tube and interior core walls, which aims to identify the particularities regarding the design, behavior and the parameters that define the post elastic behavior at the global and local level, for this structures.

[1] TBI Guidelines Working Group. (2010). Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Berkeley: University of California (PEER Report No. 2010/05).

[2] Applied Technology Council. (2010). Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council (PEER/ATC Report No. 72-1).

[3] Applied Technology Council. (2010). Proceedings of workshop on tall building seismic design and analysis issues. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council (ATC Report No. 72).

[4] Lin XC, Lu XZ, Miao ZW, Ye LP, Yu YQ, Shen L. (2009). Finite element analysis and engineeringapplication of RC core-tube structures based on the multi-layer shell elements. China Civil EngineeringJournal, 42(3), 49-54. Retrived 21 October 2013 from: http://www.oriprobe.com/journals/tmgcxb.html.

[5] Miao ZW, Ye LP, Wu YH, Ma QL, Lou Y, Lu XZ. (2009). Seismic performances and failure mode analysis ofhybrid frame-core tube structures. Building Structure, 39(04), 1-6.

[6] Powell, G. (2006). Nonlinear dynamic analysis capabilities and limitation. The Structural Design of Tall andSpecial Buildings, 15, 547-552. DOI: 10.1002/tal.381.

[7] Moehle, J.P. (2005). Nonlinear analysis of performance-based earthquake engineering. The Structural designof Tall and Special Buildings, 14, 385-400. DOI: 10.1002/tal.334

[8] Moehle, J.P. (2007). The tall buildings initiative for alternative seismic design. The Structural Design of Talland Special Buildings, 16, 559-567. DOI: 10.1002/tal.435.

[9] Stewart P., Tileylioglu S. (2007). Input ground motions for tall buildings with subterranean levels. TheStructural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16, 543-557. DOI: 10.1002/tal.429.

[10]Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale şi Adminstraţiei Publice. (2013). Cod de proiectare seismică, Partea I, Prevederi de proiectare pentru clădiri, Indicativ P100-1/2013. Bucureşti: Monitorul Oficial al României.

[11] Ministerul Dezvoltării Regionale şi Adminstraţiei Publice. (2013). Cod de proiectare a construcţiilor cu pereţi structurali de beton armat, Indicativ CR2-1-1.1:2013. Bucureşti: Monitorul Oficial al României.

[12] Cusson D., Paultre P. (1994). High-strength concrete columns confined by rectangular ties. ASCE Journal ofStructural Engineering, 120(3), 783-804. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:3(783).

[13] FEMA. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.Washington, D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[14] European Committee for Standardization. (2006). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Strengthening and repair of buildings. Brussels.

[15] Taranath, S.T. (2010). Reinforced concrete design of tall buildings. New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.

[16] Taranath, S.T. (1997). Wind and Earthquake resistant buildings structural analysis and design. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering

The Journal of Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 56 56 12
PDF Downloads 15 15 7