Comparative Study of Codes for Seismic Design of Structures

Open access

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative evaluation among some international, European and American, seismic design standards. The study considers the criteria for the analysis of conventional (residential and commercial) buildings. The study is focused on some critical topics: definition of the recurrence periods for establishing the seismic input; definition of the seismic zonation and shape of the design response spectra; consideration of local soil conditions; definition of the seismic force-resisting systems and respective response modification coefficients; definition of the allowable procedures for the seismic analysis. A model for a standard reinforced concrete building (“Model Building”) has been developed to permit the comparison among codes. This building has been modelled with two different computer programs, SAP2000 and SOFiSTiK and subjected to seismic input according to the several seismic codes. The obtained results compared are leading to some important conclusions.

References
  • [1] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C.

  • [2] European Committee for Standardization. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EN 1998-1:2004 ECS, Brussels.

  • [3] Italian Ministry of Infrastructures.(2008). Italian Ministerial Decree of 14/01/08: Norme Tecniche per leCostruzioni (Technical Standard for the Constructions.

  • [4] Italian Ministry of Infrastructures. (2009). Italian Circular No. 617 of 02/02/09: Istruzione per l'Applicazionedelle "Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (Instructions for the Application of the "Technical Standard for the Constructions).

  • [5] Romanian Ministry of Transports, Construction and Tourism. (2007). Seismic Design Code,Part 1 - P100-1/2006, Earthquake Resistant Design of Buildings.

  • [6] Romanian Standards Association. (2008). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. National Annex SR EN 1998-1

  • [7] Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (2006). Projeto de Estruturas Resistentes a Sismos (Design of Seismic Resistant Structures) NBR 15421. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (in Portuguese).

  • [8] CSI Computers & Structures, Inc. (2010). SAP2000, Integrated Software for Structural Analysis & Design, Version 14. CSI Inc, Berkeley, California, USA.

  • [9] SOFiSTiK A.G. SOFiSTiK - Finite Element Software, from: www.sofistik.com

  • [10] Gosh, SK., Fanella, DA. (2003). Seismic and Wind Design of Concrete Buildings. International Code Council, Falls Church, VA, USA.

  • [11] Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulvanologia. Mappa di pericolosità sismica del territorio nazionale, from: http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it/documenti/mappa_opcm3519.pdf

Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering

The Journal of Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 21 21 21
PDF Downloads 1 1 1