Integrated Platform for the Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings for Wind Loads

  • 1 Technical University of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering

Abstract

The Romanian, as well as other wind design codes for building structures, provides with limited degree of accuracy, the aerodynamic loads distribution on buildings up to 200 meters tall in an equivalent static approach (ESWL). For tall wind-sensitive building structures, especially for those with irregular shapes, most of the codes or standards recommend for design to use pressure data recorded in the wind tunnel. The ESWL approach is however used as reference estimation and structural first phase design. Advances on experimental and computational capabilities, led in the past decade to a significant development of time-domain analysis framework, both for seismic and wind loads. While the major outcome for earthquake engineering practitioners is to select appropriate design input ground motions at a particular site, the wind engineering practitioners are facing numerical difficulties to handle large wind loading durations, especially dealing with nonlinear-induced effects.

The paper presents a real-time integrated framework for the analysis and design of tall buildings to wind loads, based on the time-domain analysis tool, as a prerequisite for higher level modules as vulnerability, risk and loss estimation, and optimization analyses.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Lungu, D., Vacareanu, R., Aldea, A., Arion, C. (2000). Advanced Structural Analysis. Conspress Ed., Bucharest

  • [2] Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (2008). Recommendations for the Seismic Design of High-Rise Buildings. Ed. Antony Wood, Publisher: CTBUH, Chicago, ISBN: 978-0-939493-26-5

  • [3] Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2010). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings. Report no.2010/05-TBI

  • [4] Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2017), Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings,.Version 2.03. Report no.2017/06-TBI

  • [5] ASCE (2010) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.

  • [6] Iancovici, M., Vezeanu, G. (2016). A time-domain approach for the Performance-based Design Analysis of tall buildings in Bucharest. The 1940 Earthquake. Issues, Insights and Lessons Learnt, R. Vacareanu and C. Ionescu (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium Commemorating 75 Years from November 10, 1940 Vrancea Earthquake, Springer Natural Hazards Series, Springer International Publishing, Part III, pp 333-350, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29844-3_23, ISBN 978-3-319-29843-6

  • [7] Iancovici M., Nica G., Vacareanu R., Pavel F. (2019) Time domain wind-induced structural damage evaluation. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Wind Engineering (2NCWE2019), 6-7 June 2019, Bucharest

  • [8] ASCE (2019). Prestandard for Performance-based Wind Design. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

  • [9] CR-1-1-4 (2012). Code for the evaluation of wind loads on structures. Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism, Romania (in Romanian)

  • [10] Kwon, D., Kareem, A. (2013). Comparative study of major international wind codes and standards for wind effects on tall buildings. Engineering Structures, 51 (2013), 23-35

  • [11] Zhou, Y., Kijewski, T., Kareem, A. (2003). Aerodynamic Loads on Tall Buildings: An Interactive Database. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 129(3), 394-404

  • [12] Kijewski, T., Kareem, A. (1998). Dynamic wind effects: a comparative study of provisions in codes and standards with wind tunnel data. Wind and Structures, 1(1), 77-109

  • [13] National Institute of Standards and Technology (2005). Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers. NIST NCSTAR 1. Gaithersburg, MD.

  • [14] Irwin, P., Denoon, S., Scott, D. (2013). Wind Tunnel Testing of High-Rise Buildings. Publisher CTBUH& IIT and Routledge / Taylor and Francis Group, Chicago, ISBN: 978-0-415714-59-4

  • [15] Whalen, T.M., Shah, V., Jang, J.-S. (2000). A Pilot Project for Computer-Based Design of Low-Rise Buildings for Wind Loads – The WiLDE-LRS Users’s Manual, NIST GCR-00-802, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland

  • [16] Iancovici, M., Riley, M., Sadek, F., Simiu, E. (2003). Wind effects on high-rise buildings: Database-assisted design versus the high-frequency force-balance technique. Eleventh Conference on Wind Engineering, Lubbock, TX, pg. 276-283

  • [17] Diniz, S., Iancovici, M., Fritz, W., Riley, M., Simiu, E. (2004). Probabilistic Performance Criteria for Tall Buildings Subjected to Wind Loads. Wind and Seismic Effects, Proceedings of the 36th US-Japan Joint Panel Meeting, NIST Special Publication 1027, pg. 157-162.

  • [18] Main, J. A., and Fritz, W. P. (2006). Database-Assisted Design for Wind: Concepts, Software, and Examples for Rigid and Flexible Buildings. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: NIST Building Science Series 180, NIST.

  • [19] Simiu, E., Gabbai, R. D., and Fritz, W. P. (2008). Wind-induced tall building response: a time domain approach. Wind Struct. 11, 427–440.

  • [20] Yeo, D., Simiu, E. (2011). High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structures: Database-Assisted Design for Wind. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137 1340-1349.

  • [21] Simiu, E. (2011). Design of Buildings for Wind, Second Ed., Wiley.

  • [22] Kwon, D.K., Kijewski-Correa, T., Kareem, A. (2008). E-analysis of high-rise buildings subjected to wind loads. Journal of Structural Engineering,134:1139–53.

  • [23] Kareem, A., Kwon, D.K. (2017). A Cyber-Based Data-Enabled Virtual Organization for Wind Load Effects on Civil Infrastructures: VORTEX-Winds. Front. Built Environ. 3:48. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00048

  • [24] Wardlaw, R. L., Moss, G. F. (1971). A standard tall building model for the comparison of simulated natural winds in wind tunnels. Int. Conf. on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Tokyo, 1245–1250.

  • [25] CNR-DT 207/2008 Report Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, CNR – Commissione di studio per la predisposizione e l’analisi di norme tecniche relative alle costruzioni, Italy, 2008

  • [26] Vanmarcke, E. (2010). Random Fields. Analysis and Synthesis, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

  • [27] Lin, Y. K., Cai, G. (2004). Probabilistic Structural Dynamics: Advanced Theory and Applications. NewYork: McGraw-Hill

  • [28] Iancovici, M. (2019). Overview on the analysis and design of tall buildings to wind loads. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Wind Engineering (2NCWE2019), 6-7 June 2019, Bucharest

  • [29] Hatch, M., R. (2001). Vibration simulation using MATLAB and ANSYS, Chapman & Hall/CRC, ISBN 1 58488-205-0

  • [30] FEMA 356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

  • [31] Mathworks (2015). MATLAB. The Mathworks, Inc. Available at: http://www.mathworks.com/

  • [32] ** Xtract (2015) TRC Bridge Design Software Inc. Available at: http://trcbridgedesignsoftware.com/

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search