Development of a Curriculum to Enhance the Characteristics of the Future Teaching Professions of Undergraduate Students in Thailand

Open access

Abstract

Producing teachers with characteristics according to the profession’s traits is essential in progressing the country into being a learning community. This research was undertaken in order to assess and develop the present curriculum and to enhance the characteristics of the future teaching professions of undergraduate students in Thailand. The sample group comprised 24 senior undergraduate students of the English and Educational Technology program of the Faculty of Education. Percentage, mean, standard deviation (S.D.), and t-test were used to analyze the data. The findings showed that: 1. The most essential characteristics of the future teaching professions of undergraduate students were the fostering of individualized instruction, the sharing of responsibilities, the sensitive acceptance of diversity, the encouragement of creativity, and the demonstration of caring and kindness, respectively. The experts also agreed that there were 5 guidelines for the enhancement of characteristics of the teaching profession. 2. The experts agreed that the congruity of the curriculum was at a high level. 3. The students better demonstrated the characteristics of the teaching profession after trialing the curriculum. 4. The students’satisfaction with the implementation of the curriculum was at the highest level.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alexandra E. A. (2004). The Effect of Constructionism Learning in the Social Subject on Student Achievement and Analysis Thinking. Dissertation Abstracts International. 51 (November).

  • Malm B. (2009). Towards a new professionalism: enhancing personal and professional development in teacher education Journal of Education for Teaching 35(1) 77-91.

  • Buaklay N. (2017a). A Needs Assessment For Teacher Professional’s Attribute of Students Faculty of Education Yala Rajabhat University in 7th national academic conference on The Development of Learning Experience in Real Life: SMART EDUCATION for sustainable development by Faculty of Education Industry and Technology King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang Thailand pp.61-66.

  • Buaklay N. (2017b). Guidelines for enhancing instructor professional qualification According to expert opinion of the Faculty of Education students Yala Rajabhat University in the 15th national academic conference on Global Education Trends and Challenges by Asia Pacific University Japan 2017 pp.32.

  • Cronbach L. J. (1963). Course Improvement through Evaluation. Teachers College Record 64 672-683.

  • David & Stockes. (2001). Effect of the System of Instruction on Achievement Product and Attitudes Toward Science of Ninth-Grade Student Dissertation Abstracts International. 58 (November).

  • Gourneau B. (2005). Five Attitudes of Effective Teachers: Implications for Teacher Training. Essays in Education 13 1-8.

  • Hallman R. J. (1971). Techniques of Creative Teaching. Training Creative Thinking.

  • Hosking P. (2007). Compassion: what is in a word? In Kostanski M (Ed.). The power of compassion an exploration of the psychology of compassion in the 21st century. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • Kaufman R. (2000). Mega Planning. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Khurusapha. (2017). Khurusapha: Mission & Vision. (Thai). Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y99venq3

  • McNergney R. & Keller C. (1999). Appendix. Some effective teachers’ actions. In R. McNergney & C. Keller (Eds.) Images of mainstreaming: Educating students with disabilities (pp. 211-212). New York NY: Garland Publishing.

  • Ministry of Education. (2011). Thai teachers’ training day.

  • Na Pattalung N. (2007). Workshop curriculum development on English class research for teachers in private Islamic school in 5 southernmost provinces. The research of Faculty of Education Taksin University.

  • Nel J. (1992). Preservice teacher resistance to diversity: Need to reconsider instructional methodologies. Journal of Instructional Psychology 19(1) 23-27.

  • Office of National Economic and Social Development Board. (2015). Direction of the twelfth national economic and social development plan. Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister

  • Okeke C. I. O. & Drake M.L. (2014). Teacher as Role Model: The South African Position on the Character of the Teacher. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5(20) 1728-1737. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ycz7ugp7

  • Pornsima D. (2008). 31 December. The direction in developing teaching profession. Matichon. pp. 23.

  • Prasantree T. (2012). Teacher Developing Models of Students in Nakorn Phanom University. Nakorn Phanom University Journal 2(3) 25-32.

  • Saylor J. G. William M. A. & Lewis A. J.. (1981). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning. 4th ed. New York NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

  • Stake R. E. (1967). The Countenance of Educational Evaluation. Teachers College Record 68 523-540.

  • Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. (2013). Academic Curriculum Development and Curriculum Development. Nonthaburi Thailand: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University Press.

  • Secretarial Office of the Teachers Council of Thailand. (2011). Criteria and Code of Conduct for Teachers. Bangkok Thailand: Kurusapa Printing Ladphrao.

  • Taba H. (1962). Curriculum Development Theory and Practice. New York NY: Harcourt Brace and World.

  • Tyler R.W. (1971). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Witkin B. R. &Altschuld J. W. (1995). Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.

  • Wongwanich S. (2007). Needs Assessment research Bangkok Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Press.

  • Zimmerman B. J. (1998). Invited symposium: motivation & self-regulation in gifted students’ Graduate School New York NY: City University of New York.