Impacts of Aid for Innovation on Economic Growth in the Sub-Saharan African Countries

Open access


For several years, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries continue to struggle with poverty, hunger, epidemics, access to proper sanitation and potable water etc. even though the continent is considered to be endowed with half of the world’s natural resources. Low value-added products continue to be the primary export of countries in the continent since it lacks the technical know-how to manage its resources for sustainable growth and development it envisages. This paper examines the effectiveness of aid for innovation in enhancing growth and innovative performance of SSA using the Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) and fixed effect models for the period 2002 to 2015. The empirical results revealed that growth and innovation in the continent could be improved significantly if aid is more advanced to innovation and research. Also, the paper noticed that aid for innovation have more impacts in countries with the lower level of innovation and technological advancement.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ács Z. J. & Szerb L. (2012). Global entrepreneurship and development index 2012. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Arellano M. & Bover O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics68(1) 29-51.

  • Arndt C. Jones S. & Tarp F. (2015). Assessing foreign aid’s long-run contribution to growth and development. World Development69 6-18.

  • Asiedu E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: The role of natural resources market size government policy institutions and political instability. The World Economy29(1) 63-77.

  • Askarov Z. & Doucouliagos H. (2015a). Spatial aid spillovers during transition. European Journal of Political Economy40 79-95.

  • Askarov Z. & Doucouliagos H. (2015b). Development aid and growth in transition countries. World Development66 383-399.

  • Bandyopadhyay S. Lahiri S. & Younas J. (2015). Financing growth through foreign aid and private foreign loans: Nonlinearities and complementarities. Journal of International Money and Finance56 75-96.

  • Barro R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. The quarterly journal of economics106(2) 407-443.

  • Birchler K. & Michaelowa K. (2016). Making aid work for education in developing countries: An analysis of aid effectiveness for primary education coverage and quality. International Journal of Educational Development48 37-52.

  • Burke P. J. & Ahmadi-Esfahani F. Z. (2006). Aid and growth: A study of South East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics17(2) 350-362.

  • Collier P. & Dollar D. (2002). Aid allocation and poverty reduction. European economic review46(8) 1475-1500.

  • Donaubauer J. Meyer B. & Nunnenkamp P. (2016). Aid infrastructure and FDI: Assessing the transmission channel with a new index of infrastructure. World Development78 230-245.

  • Dreher A. Minasyan A. & Nunnenkamp P. (2015). Government ideology in donor and recipient countries: Does ideological proximity matter for the effectiveness of aid?. European Economic Review79 80-92.

  • Dutta N. & Williamson C. R. (2016). Aiding economic freedom: Exploring the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Economy45 24-38.

  • Escribano A. Guasch J. L. & Pena J. (2010). Assessing the impact of infrastructure quality on firm productivity in Africa: cross-country comparisons based on investment climate surveys from 1999 to 2005. Retrieved from

  • Feeny S. & Vuong V. (2017). Explaining aid project and program success: Findings from Asian Development Bank Interventions. World Development90 329-343.

  • Fløgstad C. & Hagen R. J. (2017). Aid dispersion: Measurement in principle and practice. World Development97 232-250.

  • Islam M. N. (2003). Political regimes and the effects of foreign aid on economic growth. The Journal of Developing Areas37(1) 35-53.

  • Kalyvitis S. & Vlachaki I. (2012). When does more aid imply less democracy? An empirical examination. European Journal of Political Economy28(1) 132-146.

  • Kilama E. G. (2016). The influence of China and emerging donors aid allocation: A recipient perspective. China Economic Review38 76-91.

  • Kim S. K. & Kim Y. H. (2016). Is tied aid bad for the recipient countries?. Economic Modelling53 289-301.

  • Kosack S. (2003). Effective aid: How democracy allows development aid to improve the quality of life. World development31(1) 1-22.

  • Lessmann C. & Markwardt G. (2016). Aid Growth and Devolution: Considering Aid Modality and Different Types of Decentralization. World Development84 118-130.

  • Lof M. Mekasha T. J. & Tarp F. (2015). Aid and income: Another time-series perspective. World Development69 19-30.

  • Lukovics M. & Fisher E. (2017). Socio-technical integration research in an Eastern European setting: Distinct features challenges and opportunities. Society and Economy39(4) 501-528.

  • McGillivray M. Feeny S. Hermes N. & Lensink R. (2005). Controversies over the impact of development aid: it works; it doesn’t; it can but that depends…. Journal of International Development18(7) 1031-1050.

  • Minasyan A. (2016). Aid Politics Culture and Growth(Doctoral dissertation Lower Saxony State and University Library Göttingen). Retrieved from

  • Molla T. (2014). Knowledge aid as instrument of regulation: World Bank’s non-lending higher education support for Ethiopia. Comparative Education50(2) 229-248.

  • Montellano A. Q. & Vázquez S. T. (2015). Aid & innovation: a boost to the effectiveness of aid?” Revista International de Cooperación y Desarrollo 2(1) 5-36.

  • Naudé W. (2011). Foreign Aid for Innovation: The Missing Ingredient in Private Sector Development?’ (No. 2011/35).

  • Ndikumana L. & Pickbourn L. (2017). The impact of foreign aid allocation on access to social services in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of water and sanitation. World Development90 104-114.

  • OECD. (2012). Innovation for Development. The Directorate for Science Technology and Industry OECD Paris.

  • OECD. (2016). The List of CRS Purpose Codes. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Paris.

  • Osei R. Morrissey O. & Lloyd T. (2004). The nature of aid and trade relationships. The European Journal of Development Research16(2) 354-374.

  • Pallas S. W. & Ruger J. P. (2017). Effects of donor proliferation in development aid for health on health program performance: A conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine175 177-186.

  • Rajan R. G. & Subramanian A. (2008). Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show?. The Review of economics and Statistics90(4) 643-665.

  • Reinsberg B. (2015). Foreign aid responses to political liberalization. World Development75 46-61.

  • Riddell A. & Niño-Zarazúa M. (2016). The effectiveness of foreign aid to education: What can be learned?. International Journal of Educational Development48 23-36.

  • Sumida S. (2017). Donor’s motivation of the educational aid. International Journal of Educational Development55 17-29.

  • Udvari B. & Vas Z. (2017). Nemzetközi fejlesztési segélyezés az innováció területén. International development assistance on innovationKülgazdaság 7(8) 74-101

  • UNCTAD (2007): The Least Developed Countries Report 2007. Geneva and New York: United Nations on Conference and Trade.

  • Wagner D. (2003). Aid and trade—an empirical study. Journal of the Japanese and international economies17(2) 153-173.

  • WEF (2017): Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. World Economic Forum Geneva.

  • World Bank (2008). Global Economic Prospects. Technology Diffusion in the Developing World. The World Bank Washington.