This study set out to investigate the reality or otherwise of the pollution haven hypothesis in Nigeria using data from 1970 to 2017 and using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models both in the short and long run. The study used FDI inflows as measure of economic activity and carbon dioxide emission as a measure of regulatory stringency. The study finds the previous FDI inflows as a significant determinant of current FDI both in the short and long run. This implies that the more FDI an economy attracts, the more potentials it has to further attract more FDI. Population, a measure of demand condition of the host economy is positively and significantly related to FDI inflows both in the short run and in the long run. Trade openness has a positively significant impact on FDI inflows in the long run, meaning that globalization encourages FDI inflows. A year lag of the FDI has a positively significant impact on FDI inflows in the long run. This suggest that pollution haven hypothesis which states that industries with polluting technologies tend to relocate to countries or areas (pollution havens) with lax or less stringent environmental regulations is a reality for Nigeria. The implication of this is that government of Nigeria must weigh the beneficial impact of FDI inflows against the pollution impact of ‘dirty’ FDI before deciding or setting its environmental policy.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Aliyu Mohammed Aminu (2005) Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: Pollution Haven Hypothesis Revisited. Paper prepared for the Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis Liibeck Germany June 9-11.
Antweiler W.Copeland B. R. and TAYLOR M. S. (2001) Is Free Trade Good for The Environment? The American Economic Review 91 (4) pp. 877 – 908.
Ayadi F.S. (2005) A Vector Autoregressive Analysis of Trade-Environment Linkage in Nigeria. World Review of Science Technology and Sustainable Development. (www.inderscience.com). Vol. 2 No 2. Pp. 191 – 204.
Ayadi F.S. (2014) Economic Integration Growth and the Environment in Africa: A Study of Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics Finance and Banking (JEIEFB). Vol: 3 Issue 6.
Birdsall N. and Wheeler D. (1993) Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment and Development. Vol 2 PP137-149.
\Cole M. and Elliot R.J R (2003) Do Environmental Regulations Influence Trade Trade Patterns? Testing Old and New Trade Theories. World Economy 26 (8) pp. 1163 – 1186.
Cole M. A. and Elliot R. J. R. (2002) FDI and the Capital Intensity of “Dirty” Sectors: A Miing Piece of the Pollution Haven Puzzle. Mimeo. University of Birmingham.
Copeland Brian R. and Taylor M. Scott (2004) Trade Growth and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature Vol XLII Pp.7-71.
Chao C.C. and Yu E.S.H. (1997) International Capital Competition and Environmental Standards Southern Economic Journal 64 531-541.
Danladi D. Jonathan and Akomolafe John Kehinde (2003) Foreign Direct Investment Economic Growth and Environmental Concern: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies. Vol. 5 No. 7 PP 460-468
Dean M J.; lovely E. Mary and Wang Hua (2004) Foreign Direct Investment and Pollution Havens: Evaluating the Evidence from China. Economic Working Paper No. 2004-01-B. US International Trade Commission Washington DC 20436 USA.
Kellogg R. (2006) The Pollution Haven Hypothensis: Significance and Insignificance. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Long Beach Califonia. July 23-26 2006.
Levinson A. (2003) Environmental Regulatory Competition: a status report and some new evidence. National Tax Journal 56 pp91-106.
Leontief W. (1953) Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Soceity. Vol. 97 pp 331 – 349.
Leslie Jonathan Richard (2016) Enterprise Location Decisions and The Pollution Haven Hypothesis.
Lundh M. (2017) Environmental Policy Stringency and Foreign Direct Investment-Testing the Pollution Haven Hypothesis with a new composite index. Master’s Programmes Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Economics. Uppsala. Downloaded at http://stud.epsilon.slu.seon9/11/2018.
Neumayer E. (2001) Pollution Havens: An Analysis of Policy options for Dealing with an Elusive Phenomenon. Journal of Environment and Development Vol 10 No. 2 147-177
Mathys Nicole A. (2003) A Simple Test of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Graduate University of Louisanne.
Mani M. and Wheeler D. (1999) In Search of Pollution Haven? Dirty Indusries in the World Economy. 1960 – 1995. Fredricksson P. G. (eds.) in Trade Global Policy and the Environment. Discussion Paper no 402 World Bank Washington D. C.
Oates W.E. and Schwab R.M. (1988) Economic Competition Among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing? Journal of Public Economic. Vol 35. PP 333-354.
Porter M. E. and Van der Linde C. (1995) Towards a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective. Vol. 9 pp97-118.
Riti J. S. and Kamah M. (2015) Glibalization Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability Nexus in Nigeria (1981 – 2013). IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 20 Issue 3 pp 23-25. And Policy 4 (2).
Taylor M. S. (2005) Unboundling the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. The B E Journal of Econom ic Analysis
Temurshoev Umed (2006) Pollution Haven Hypothesis or Factor Endowment Hypothesis: Theory and Emperical Examination for the US and China. CERGE-EI Working Paper Series 292 March.
World Bank (1999) World Development Indicators Washington DC.RL: http://data.wordbank.org/indicator
World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators Database. Data extracted on U
Xing Yuqing and Kolstad D. Charles (1997) Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment? Department of Economics Working Paper 6-95R. University of Califonia Santa Barbara. February.