Tax-Related Burden on SMEs in the European Union: The Case of Slovenia

Open access


Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are very important for the European economy. However, SMEs often encounter various barriers, whereby tax-related barriers are perceived as the most burdensome that affects their business operations and entrepreneurial activity in general. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it attempts to identify SMEs perception on current state and measures to be carried out in order to reduce respective red tape. Second, it tries to establish the relationship between burdens imposed by tax policy and entrepreneurial activity. Using hierarchical cluster analysis and descriptive statistics two different datasets are analyzed for the European Union (EU) and Slovenia separately. The results provide evidence that tax burden is less influential than tax administrative burden among EU countries by considering their impact on new business density and total early-stage entrepreneurial activity. Additionally, the results for Slovenia reveal that the need for a stable tax system, with IT and procedurally related measures are highlighted.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aristovnik A. & Obadić A. (2015). The impact and efficiency of public administration excellence on fostering SMEs in EU countries. Amfiteatru economic17(39) 761–774.

  • Bailey K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: an introduction to classification techniques (Vol. 102). Sage.

  • Bartlett W. & Bukvič V. (2001). Barriers to SME growth in Slovenia. MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies11(2) 177–195.

  • Bernardi L. (2012). Heterogeneity of taxation in EA Member Countries and some implications for EA fiscal governance. Italy: University of Pavia.

  • Block J. (2016). Corporate income taxes and entrepreneurship. IZA World of Labor.

  • Braunerhjelm P. & Eklund J.E. (2014). Taxes tax administrative burdens and new firm formation. Kyklos67(1) 1–11.

  • Buckley A. P. (2016). Using Contribution Analysis to evaluate small & medium enterprise support policy. Evaluation 22(2) 129–148.

  • Chattopadhyay S. & Das-Gupta A. (2002). The personal income tax in India: Compliance costs and compliance behaviour of taxpayers. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

  • Djankov S. Ganser T. McLiesh C. Ramalho R. & Shleifer A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics2(3) 31–64.

  • Djankov S. McLiesh C. & Ramalho R.M. (2006). Regulation and growth. Economics Letters92(3) 395–401.

  • European Commission. (2004). European Tax Survey. Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Commission. (2007). Simplified Tax Compliance Procedures for SMEs. Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Commission. (2018). Interactive SME database 2016. Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Parliament. (2016). Barriers to SME growth in Europe. Strasbourg: European Parliament.

  • Franzoni L. 2000. Tax Evasion and Tax Compliance. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics ed. B. Bouckaert and G. DeGeest vol. 4 51–94. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Gan G. Ma C. & Wu J. (2007). Data clustering: theory algorithms and applications (Vol. 20). Siam.

  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2016). Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Attitudes data. London: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.

  • James S. & Alley C. (2002). Tax compliance Self-Assessment and Tax Administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public services2(2) 27–42.

  • de Jong G. & van Witteloostuijn A. (2015). Regulatory Red Tape and Private Firm Performance. Public Administration 34–51.

  • Kaufmann W. & Feeney M. F. (2014). Beyond the Rules The Effect of Outcome Favorability on Red Tape Perceptions Public Administration 92(1) 178191.

  • Kovač P. Đulabić V. & Čičin-Šain N. (2017). Removal of administrative barriers through the recent procedural simplifications in Slovenia and Croatia. Danube 8(4) 207–228.

  • Kovač P. & Jukić T. (2017). Recent Regional Developments in Red Tape Reduction – a Content Analysis of Web of Science Journals. Lex Localis 15(2) 433–457.

  • Milavec U. & Klun M. (2011). Familiarity with Measures to Reduce Administrative Burdens in the Public and Private Sector in Slovenia. Uprava11(1) 7–23.

  • Ministry of Interior. (2013). Enotna metodologija za merjenje stroškov ki jih zakonodaja povzroča subjektom. Ljubljana: Ministry of Interior.

  • Ravšelj D. & Aristovnik A. (2018). Administrative Barriers for SMEs in the Field of Tax Compliance and Financial and Accounting Reporting: Evidence from Slovenia. Problemy Zarządzania (1/2018 (73) t. 2) 75-90.

  • Ropret M. Aristovnik A. & Ravšelj D. (2018). The Perception of Administrative Barriers and Their Implications for SMEs’ Performance: Evidence from Slovenia. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business21(SCI) 55-68.

  • Slabe-Erker R. & Klun M. (2012). The contribution of institutional quality to lowering company compliance costs. African Journal of Business Management6(8) 3111–3119.

  • World Bank. (2016) Doing Business Data. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • World Bank. (2016). Entrepreneurship Survey Data. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • World Economic Forum. (2015). Global Competitiveness Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.