Inclusive Policy and Academic Achievements in Mathematics of Student with Special Educational Needs (SEN) in Republic of Serbia

Open access


One mechanism for evaluating educational systems for inclusion is through academic outputs of students who are taught in either segregated or inclusive setting. The goal of the research was to examine and compare the academic achievement in Mathematics of students with special education needs (SEN) in the fifth and sixth grade (11-12 years old students) in different educational settings in the Republic of Serbia. In this study, 175 students from 11 special and 7 regular schools participated in the research. Assessment results demonstrated statistically significant differences achievement for students in sixth grade in special schools compared to students with SEN in the same classes of regular schools. At fifth grade level there was no statistical difference between the students in special and regular schools. We discuss possible reasons why differences may or may not exist, including distinguishing between inclusion and integration as well as sociohistorical differences in grade levels.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ainscow. M. Farrell P. & Tweddle D. (2000). Developing policies for inclusive education: a study of the role of local education authorities. International Journal of Inclusive Education 4 (3) 211–230.

  • Ainscow M. & Miles S. (2008). Making Education for all inclusive: Where next? Prospects 37(1) 15-34.

  • Baker J. M.& Zigmond N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education 29 (2) 163-180.

  • Bhattacharya T. (2010). Re-examining issue of inclusion in education. Economic and Political Weekly (April 17) 18-25.

  • Brophy J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist 10 1069-1077.

  • Buchem I. (2013). Diversität und Spaltung. En: Ebner Martin. and S. Schön Sandra (Eds.). Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien. 2a ed. Berlin: Epubli GmbH.

  • Donati P. (2006). Repensar la Sociedad Madrid: Ediciones Internacionales Universitarias.

  • Dyson A. & Gains C. (1993). Special needs and effective learning: towards a collaboration model for the year 2000. In: A. Dyson and C. Gains (Eds.) Rethinking Special Needs in Mainstream Schools towards the year 2000. London: David Fulton.

  • Dyson A. Farrell P. Polat F. Hutcheson G. & Gallannaugh F. (2004). Inclusion and Pupil Achievement. Newcastle UK: University of Newcastle Department for Education and Skills.

  • Edyburn D. L. (2003). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in mathematics. Journal of Special Education Technology 18 (4) 76-79.

  • Elbaum B. E. Vaughn S. Hughes M.T. & Moody S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure?. Journal of Educational Psychology 92. 605–619.

  • Emmanuelson I. (2001). Reactive versus proactive support coordinator roles: an international comparison. European Journal of Special Needs Education 16 (2) 133–142.

  • Engsig T. & Johnstone C. (2015). Is there something rotten in the state of Denmark? The paradoxical policies of inclusive education–lessons from Denmarkn. International Journal of Inclusive Education 19 (5) 469-486.

  • Friend M. Cook L. Hurley-Chamberlain D. & Shamberger C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 20 (1) 9–27.

  • Galović D. Brojčin B. & Glumbić N. (2014). The attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Vojvodina International Journal of Inclusive Education 12 1262–1282.

  • Kavale K. A. & Forness S.R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten E. P. Schiller & S. Vaughn (Eds.) Contemporary Special Education Research Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

  • LouY. Abrami P.C. Spence J.C. Poulsen C. Chambers B. & D’Apollonia S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66 423–458.

  • Maheady L. Harper G. F. & Mallette B. (2003). Class-wide peer tutoring. Current Practice Alerts. 8 1–4.

  • Mastropieri M. A. & Scruggs T. E. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly 24 (4) 265-274.

  • McLeskey J. Waldron N. Spooner L. F. & Algozzine B. (2014). Handbook of Effective Inclusive Schools: Research and Practice. New York London: Routledge.

  • Mitchell D. (2010). Education That Fits: Review of International Trends in the Education of Students with Special Educational Needs. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

  • Naicker S. (2015). The politics of inclusive education in South Africa. In F. Kiuppis and R.S. Hausstätter (Eds.). Inclusive Education Twenty Years After Salamanca. New York: Peter Lang.

  • Nikolić G. Lukić M. & Janković V. (2010). Deca i učenici sa smetnjama i teškoćama u razvoju u Republici Srbiji. Beograd: Zavod za napređivanje obrazovanja i vaspitanja

  • Nikolić G. Nedeljković M. (2015). Inkluzija u Srbiji - u potrazi za smislenim putem. Socijalna misao 4 9-19.

  • PopovićZ.&NikolićG. (2015) Postignuća uчenika sa smetnjama u razvoju u zavisnosti od vrste шkole nastavnog predmeta i vrste smetnje; Inovacije u nastavi Uчiteljski fakultet u Beogradu (437-457)

  • Republic of Serbia. (2006). Zakon o sprečavanju diskriminacije osoba sa invaliditetom [The Law on the Prevention of Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities]. Beograd [Belgrade]: Službeni glasnik RS 33/06 [Official Gazette of the RS 33/06].

  • Republic of Serbia. (2009). Zakon o osnovama sistema obrazovanja i vaspitanja [The Law on the Fundamentals of the Education System]. Beograd [Belgrade]: Službeni glasnik RS 72/09 [Official Gazette of the RS 72/09].

  • Republic of Serbia. (2015). Zakon o udžbenicima [The Law of a Textbook]. Beograd [Belgrade]: Službeni glasnik RS 33/15 [Official Gazette of the RS 33/15].

  • Rodriguez C.C. & N. Garro-Gil (2014). Inclusion and integration on special education. Procedia: Science and Behavioral Sciences 191 1323-1327.

  • Rouse M. & Florian L. (1996). Effective Inclusive Schools: a study in two countries Cambridge Journal of Education 26 (1) 71-85.

  • Shin M. & Pedrotty D.B. (2015). A synthesis of mathematical and cognitive performances of students with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities 48 (1) 96-112.

  • Stenhoff D. M. & Lignugaris-Kraft B. (2007). A review of the effects of peer tutoring on students with mild disabilities in secondary settings. Exceptional Children 74 (1) 8–30.

  • Steiner-Khamsi G. & Quist H. (2000). The politics of educational borrowing: Reopening the Case of Achimota in British Ghana Comparative Education Review 44 (3) 272-299.

  • Swanson H. L. (1999). Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Swanson H. L. Carson C. & Sachs-Lee C. M. (1996). A selective synthesis of intervention research for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review 25 370–391.

  • Thurlow M. L. Ysseldyke J.E. WotrubaJ.W. & Algozzine B. (1993). Instruction in special education classrooms under varying student-teacher ratios. The Elementary School Journal 93 305–320.

  • UNICEF Ministry of Education and IPSOS (2015). Analiza kvaliteta obrazovanja u školama i odeljenjima za obrazovanje dece sa smetnjama u razvoju Beograd: Authors. [Online] Available:

  • United Nations (2016). Sustainable Development Goals. New York: Author. [Online] Available:

  • Vaughn Sh. Gersten R. & Chard D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children 67 (1). 99-114.

  • Vigotski L. S. (1996). Osnovi defektologije. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

  • Vislie L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education 18 (1) 17-35.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (1925). Principles of social education for deaf and dumb children in Russia. In: International Conference on the Education of the Deaf 227-235.

  • Zigmond N. (2003). Where should students with disabilities receive special education services? Is one place better than another? The Journal of Special Education 37 (3) 193-199.