Marketing for Science Based Organizations Perspectives and Questions

Open access

Summary

Marketing for research and science-based organizations is complex and not well understood; especially by the research, scientific, and technical communities. This paper presents a conceptual framework for scientists in research and science-based organizations to think about their organization’s marketing and sales functions, and related processes. NASA, one of the world’s most successful research organizations, which put two American astronauts on the moon in approximately 8 years, is briefly explored. The role of 21st Century research and science-based organizations in creating societal, organizational, and individual wealth is examined via a conceptual framework of the virtuous wealth creation process. Two forms of intrinsic organizational cultural conflict are examined; the external cultural conflicts between potential customers and the technology organization, and the internal conflict between scientists and economic managers. Strategic marketing is addressed and consists of market need, market segmentation, choosing a target market, and the organization’s position relative to the target market and competition. Tactical marketing (AKA sales) and its elements are delineated - product, price, promotion, physical distribution, and most importantly - personnel. The integration of all elements of strategic and tactical marketing into a cohesive whole is underscored. Additionally, several marketing and sales questions are posed to facilitate self-assessment by research and technology-based organizations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. American Marketing Association (2018). https://www.ama.org/AboutAMA/Pages/Definition-of-Marketing.aspx

  • 2. Data Market (December 5 2018). DataMarket: https://datamarket.com/data/set/1xdu/gdp-per-capita-constant-us-millions#!ds=1xdu!208h=1g&display=line

  • 3. Drucker P. (2008). The Five Most Important Questions You Will Ever Ask about Your Organization. San Francisco California: Jossey-Bass

  • 4. Drucker P. (1973 & 1985). Management: Revised Edition. New York: HarperCollins.

  • 5. Dubinskas F. (1988). Janus Organizations: Scientists & Managers. Making Time: Ethno graphics of High Technology Organizations.

  • 6. Folger J. (August 29 2012). The ROI of Space Exploration. Investopediahttps://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0812/the-roi-of-space-exploration.aspx

  • 7. Fowler W. (July 21 2014). Anniversary Shows US that NASA and Space Exploration are Worth Their Costs. UT Newshttps://news.utexas.edu/2014/07/21/anniversary-shows-us-that-nasa-and-space-exploration-are-worth-their-costs

  • 8. Ghemawat P. (March 1985). Building Strategy on the Experience Curve. Harvard Business Reviewhttps://hbr.org/1985/03/building-strategy-on-the-experience-curve

  • 9. Henderson B. (1973). The Experience Curve Reviewed. Perspectives. Boston: Boston Consulting Group https://www.bcg.com/documents/file13904.pdf

  • 10. Kroll L.& Dolan K. (March 6 2018). Meet the Members of the Three-Comma Club -The 2018 List. Forbes Magazine.

  • 11. Levitt T. (July August 1960). Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review 38 45–56.

  • 12. Lovelock C. & Wirtz J. (2011). Services Marketing: People Technology Strategy 7th ed. Upper Saddle River New Jersey Prentice Hall.

  • 13. Romer P. (October 1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 no. 5 S71-S102.

  • 14. Solow R. (August 1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics MIT Press Vol. 39 No. 3 pp. 312-320.

  • 15. Stevens G. & Burley J. (1997). 3000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success! Research-Technology Management 40:3 16-27 DOI: 10.1080/08956308.1997.11671126

  • 16. Stirone S. (November 4 2015). The Real Cost of NASA Missions. Popular Science https://www.popsci.com/real-cost-nasa-missions

  • 17. Von Hippel E. (July 1976). The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy 5 no. 3 212–239 doi:10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028.7.

  • 18. Wang J. (October 8 2018). Scholar becomes 91st person associated with UChicago to receive Nobel Prize. UChicago News: https://news.uchicago.edu/story/economist-paul-romer-sb77-phd83-wins-share-nobel-prize

  • 19. Wartzman R. & Crosby L. (December 3 2018). Under the Hood of the Management Top 250. Wall Street Journal p. R2 & R4-R6.

  • 20. Zehner W. Williams C. & Pletcher G. (August 2016). Technology Creates 21st Century Wealth - Processes Problems and Prognosis. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations Journal vol. 20 2 17–38 https://doi.org/10.14611/minib.20.03.2016.08

  • 21. Zehner B. & Pletcher G. (October 2017). Successful Technology Commercialization — Yes or No — Improving the Odds. The Quick Look Methodology and Process. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organization vol. 25 81—101 https:doi.org/10.14611/minib.25.09.2017.13

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 12 12 7
PDF Downloads 21 21 9