Bandit: Here to Haunt You! On Why I Became an Émigré Theatre Maker

Summary

The article employs concepts of time lag, inspired by Ernst Bloch, and ghost and haunting, borrowed from Jacques Derrida. It also draws on Svetlana Boym’s and Vilém Flusser’s vision of the émigré and on Dominick LaCapra’s and Slavoj Žižek’s interpretations of trauma. The analysis is also informed by Karen Jürs-Munby’s and Cathy Caruth’s views on trauma and its representation in theatre.

This critical apparatus is put into motion in the particular context of BANDIT: a theatre project developed in the UK by two Romanian émigré theatre-makers. The main focus is on exposing links between the references to trauma contained in the theatre piece BANDIT and the makers’ self-imposed artistic exile in the UK. The article seeks to answer the following question: what has pushed us, the makers of BANDIT, to leave our native country and what is our (new) role (as artists) in the country of emigration? The discussion is carried out within the wider context of the vast waves of Romanian emigration to Western Europe (after the fall of the Iron Curtain). The article critiques the troublesome relation of the contemporary Romanian society to its Communist past and the apparent inability and/or unwillingness to deal with the repressed/traumatic memories of that past. Analysis of BANDIT as performance of lingering trauma also references the historical Percentages agreement between Stalin and Churchill—the informal agreement that established spheres of influence in Europe at the end of the Second World War. Identifying the Iron Curtain as the epicentre of traumatic memory for Eastern Europeans, the discussion about BANDIT also makes a reference to Communist crimes against political prisoners committed in Romanian prisons in 1951–1952, put in parallel with the toxic EU referendum campaign in the UK in 2016. Underpinned by Derrida’s thinking, the article explains how the Romanian émigré-artist (as a paragon of the Romanian / Eastern European émigré in general) has to fashion herself into a ghost that haunts the adoptive culture, using artistic exile as a platform for processing the traumatic memories of an unresolved past.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Andreescu, Gabriel. Existenta prin cultura. Represiune, colaborationism si rezistenta intelectuala sub regimul communist. Iași: Editura POLIROM, 2015.

  • Bantaș, Andrei. To the star. Accessed April 13, 2019. http://luceafarul.com/Pages/sbsuntothestarsbantas.html

  • Blandiana, Ana. Istoria ca viitor. Accessed April 13, 2019.

  • https://s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pressone/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/24175425/Discursul-Anei-Blandiana-de-acceptare-a-DHC-UBB-Cluj.pdf

  • Bloch, Ernst. Heritage of Our Times. USA: California University Press, 1991.

  • Bloch, Ernst, and Mark Ritter. “Non-Synchronism and the Obligation to Its Dialectics.” New German Critique, 11 (Spring 1977): 31.

  • Boia, Lucian. La mythologie scientifique du communisme. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2000.

  • Boym, Svetlana. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books, 2001.

  • Caruth, Cathy. Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.

  • Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.

  • Churchill, Winston. Memoirs of the Second World War. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1991.

  • Defourmantelle, Anne. Of Hospitality: Anne Defourmantelle invites Jacques Derrida to respond. California: Stanford University Press, 2000.

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Bernard Stiegler. “Spectrographies.” In The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory, edited by Maria del Pilar Blanco and Ester Peeren. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 37–53.

  • Durst, David. “Ernst Bloch’s Theory of Nonsimultaneity.” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, Volume 77, Issue 3, 2002, 171–194.

  • Flusser, Vilém. Writings. Edited by Andreas Stohl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.

  • Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 1961.

  • Jürs-Munby, Karen. “‘Did you mean post-traumatic theatre?’: The vicissitudes of traumatic memory in contemporary postdramatic performances.” Performance Paradigm. Volume 5, Issue 2, October 2009, 201–223.

  • LaCapra, Dominick. History in Transit: Experience, Identity, Critical Theory. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University, 2004.

  • Malkin, Jeanette. Memory: Theatre and Postmodern Drama. USA: University of Michigan Press, 1999.

  • Nedelcovici, Bujor. Un tigru de hartie. Eu, Nica si Securitatea. Bucharest: Allfa, 2003.

  • Nu Nu Theatre. BANDIT. Accessed September 28, 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po_60GDoRwc

  • Rand, Nicholas T. “Editor’s Note.” In The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis, edited by Nicholas Abraham and Maria Torok. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

  • Reed-Danahay, Deborah, ed. Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. New York, Oxford: Berg, 1997.

  • Rusan, Romulus, ed. Anale Sighet 10. Anii 1973–1989: Cronica unui sfarsit de system. Bucharest: Fundatia Academia Civica, 2003.

  • United Nations. “International Migration Report 2015: Highlights.” Accessed April 13, 2019. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015_Highlights.pdf

  • Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew. “Introduction: The Spectral Turn.” In Spectral America: Phantoms and the National Imagination. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004.

  • Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. New York: Verso, 1989.

  • Žižek, Slavoj. Mapping the Ideology. New York: Verso, 1994.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search