In this text, I describe a specific way of addressing the past in video games which are set in historical times but at the same time deliberately undermine the facticity of their virtual worlds. By grounding my argument in analyses of two blockbuster productions—Assassin’s Creed (Ubisoft, 2007) and Call of Duty: Black Ops (Activision, 2010)—I introduce and define the notion of “simulational realism”. Both games belong to best-selling franchises and share an interesting set of features: they relate to historical places, events, and figures, establish counter-factual narratives based around conspiracy theories, and—most importantly—display many formal similarities. Like most AAA games, Assassin’s Creed and Black Ops intend to immerse the player in the virtual reality and, for this purpose, they naturalize their interfaces as integral elements of reality. However, in the process of naturalizing simulation, objectivity of the past becomes unthinkable.
In my considerations, I situate this problem in two contexts: 1) of a cultural and epistemic shift in perceiving reality which was influenced by dissemination of digital technologies; 2) Vilém Flusser’s prognosis on the effects of computation on human knowledge. According to Flusser’s theory of communication, history—as a specific kind of human knowledge—emerged out of writing that was always linear and referential. Consequently, the crisis of literary culture resulted in the emergence of new aesthetics and forms of representations which—given their digital origin—dictate new ways of understanding reality. As history is now being substituted by timeless post-history, aesthetic conventions of realism are also transformed and replaced by digital equivalents.
Following Flusser’s theory, I assert that we should reflect on the epistemological consequences of presenting the past as simulation, especially if we consider the belief shared by many players that games like Assassin’s Creed can be great tools for learning history. I find such statements problematic, if we consider that the historical discourse, grounded on fact, is completely incompatible with the aesthetics of sim-realism which evokes no illusion of objective reality.
Barthes, Roland. S/Z, translated by Richard Miller. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002.
Michel de Certeau. The Writing of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus, translated by Robert Hurley et al.. London: Continuum, 2004.
Elliott, Andrew B. R., and Matthew Wilhelm Kapel. “Introduction: To Build a Past That Will ‘Stand the Test of Time’—Discovering Historical Facts, Assembling Historical Narratives.” In Playing with the Past: Digital Games and the Simulation of History, edited by Andrew B. R. Elliott and Matthew Wilhelm Kapel. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
Elsaesser, Thomas. “The Mind-Game Film/.” In Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema, edited by Warren Buckland. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Ferguson, Niall. “Virtual History: Towards a ‘Chaotic’ Theory of the Past,” In Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals, edited by Niall Ferguson. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
Flusser, Vilém. Writings, translated by Erik Eisel. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
Hansen, Mark B. N. Bodies in Code. New York: Routledge, 2006.
Juul, Jesper. The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Boston: MIT Press, 2013.
Markoff, John. What the Dormouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Industry. London: Penguin, 2005.
Reisner, Clemens. “‘The Reality Behind It All Is Very True’: Call of Duty: Black Ops and the Remembrance of the Cold War.” in Playing with the Past: Digital Games and the Simulation of History, edited by Matthew Kapel. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
Welsch, Timothy J. Mixed Realism: Videogames and the Violence of Fiction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
Wirth, Werner et al. “A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences.” Media Psychology 9 (2007), 493–525.
White, Hayden. “Literary Theory and Historical Writing.” In Figural Realism: Studies in Mimesis Effect, edited by Hayden White. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1999.