Tension Between Everyday Practice and the New Museology Theory: A Case of the National Gallery of Art in Vilnius

Neringa Stoškutė 1
  • 1 Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania

Summary

This article aims to present the main aspects of the New Museology theory and discuss the possibilities of its adaptation in Lithuanian museum practice. To date, the New Museology theory, which was formed in the 1980’s and places the emphasis on the contextual presentation of artworks and the social role museums play in public cultural life, is not widely used in Lithuanian museum practice and a comprehensive survey of art museum permanent collection displays has not been carried out in regards to this particular framework. The first part of this article presents the New Museology theory and its historiography, including main authors, who have contributed to the formation and development of the ‘new’ theory. The second part presents an overview of different methods of display, including aesthetic, contextual/educational and white cube models. The third part shows how a recent establishment of the National Gallery of Art (NGA) in Lithuania completely ignored the New Museology theory and was based on the modernist view of art history, made popular in the Soviet period. Thus, it comes as no surprise, that the permanent collection display at the NGA has received a lot of criticism from various cultural and art historians and other academics. It is expected that the presentation of the main aspects of the New Museology theory and an assessment of a permanent collection display at the National Gallery of Art will help inform Lithuanian museum practice and form a basis for further studies in Lithuanian museological research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aleksandravičiūtė, Dovilė and Markevičiūtė, Vaida. “Apie tikrovės ribas ir dailės santykį su ideologija” [On Boundaries of Reality and Relationship Between Art and Ideology]. Kultūros barai (No. 4, 2010): 36–45.

  • Andriuškevičius, Alfonsas. “Dailės galerija – ne enciklopedija” [An Art Gallery is not an Encyclopaedia]. Šiaurės atėnai (No. 957, 2009). Accessed April 22, 2017. http://eia.libis.lt:8080/archyvas/viesas/20110131123530/http://www.culture.lt/satenai/?leid_id=957&kas=straipsnis&st_id=17060

  • Black, Graham. Transforming Museums in the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge, 2012.

  • Čepauskaitė, Austėja. “Nacionalinis tapatumas Lietuvos dailės muziejuje: dvi dailės istorijos versijos” [National Identity at the Lithuanian Art Museum: Two Versions of Art History]. Acta Academiae Artium Vilnesis (No. 58, 2010): 153–164.

  • Dovydaitytė, Linara. “Nacionalinė dailės galerija: atminties ir nesantaikos vieta” [The National Gallery of Art: A Site of Memory and Contention]. Dailė (No. 1, 2010a): 4–10.

  • Dovydaitytė, Linara. “Post-Soviet Writing of History: The Case of the National Gallery of Art in Vilnius”. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi (Studies on Art and Architecture) (T. 19, No. 3–4, 2010b): 105–120.

  • Dobriakovas, Jurijus. “„Eksperimentas“ – daugiau nei sėkmingas” [Experiment is More Than Successful] (2007-12-21). Accessed June 4, 2017. https://www.tv3.lt/naujiena/177690/eksperimentas-daugiau-nei-sekmingas.

  • Duncan, Carol. Civilizing Rituals. London: Routledge, 1995.

  • Gaižutytė-Filipavičienė, Živilė. “Meno muziejai ir medijos” [Art Museums and Media]. Lietuvos kultūros tyrimai 2: Muziejai, paveldas, vertybės, ed. Rita Repšienė, Vilnius: Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas, 2012. 47–63.

  • Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. “Museums and communication: an introductory essay”. Museum, Media, Message, ed. Eilean Hooper-Greenhill. London: Rout-ledge, 1995. 1–12.

  • Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1992.

  • Jablonskienė, Lolita. “Laiko zonos” [Time Zones]. Architektūros [leidinių] fondas. Accessed April 22, 2017. http://www.archfondas.lt/leidiniu/alf-01/lolitajablonskiene-laiko-zonos.

  • Jankevičiūtė, Giedrė. “Writing Art History of the Vanished States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 1940s”. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi (Studies on Art and Architecture) (T. 19, No. 3–4, 2010): 86–104.

  • Jankevičiūtė, Giedrė. “Nacionalinė dailės galerija: pirmieji įspūdžiai” [The National Gallery of Art: First Impressions]. Naujasis Židinys-Aidai (No. 7, 2009): 279–282.

  • Jankevičiūtė, Giedrė. “Paroda „Eksperimentas“ – nuolatinės NDG (MMM) ekspozicijos bandymas?” [Experiment – An Attempt for Permanent Display at the NGA?] Šiaurės Atėnai (2008-01-19, No. 877). Accessed April 21, 2017. http://eia.libis.lt:8080/archyvas/viesas/20110116223402/http://www.culture.lt/satenai/?leid_id=877&kas=straipsnis&st_id=15697.

  • Juocevičiūtė, Eglė. “Nacionalinė dailės galerija praeities neneigs ir neslėps” [The National Gallery of Art will not Deny and Hide The Past]. Kultūros barai (No. 6, 2009): 49–52.

  • Kinčaitis, Virginijus. “Muziejinio laiko dramaturgija ir lankytojo nerimas” [Dramaturgy of Museum Time and Visitors’ Anxiety]. Dailė (No. 2, 2010): 8–9.

  • Keršytė, Nastazija. “Nacionalinis tapatumas ir nacionalinių muziejų situacija. Muziejų politikos problemos” [National Identity and National Museum Situation. Museum Politics]. Liaudies kultūra (No. 5, 2012): 20–29.

  • Keršytė, Nastazija. “Muzeologija Lietuvos mokslo kontekste” [Museology in Lithuanian Research Context]. Knygotyra (No. 40, 2003): 10–23.

  • McCall, Vicky and Gray, Clive. “Museums and the ‘new museology’: theory, practice and organisational change”. Museum Management and Curatorship (T. 29, No. 1, 2013): 1–17. Accessed: June 7, 2017. https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/theatre_s/cp/staff/gray/research/new_museology_article.pdf.

  • Mensch, Peter van. “Towards a Methodology of Museology”. PhD thesis, University of Zagreb, 1992. Accessed: June 7, 2017. http://emuzeum.cz/admin/files/Peter-van-Mensch-disertace.pdf.

  • Skudutis, Mindaugas. “Neišmokę istorijos pamokų” [History Lessons were not Learned] Kultūros barai (No. 7/8, 2009): 32–35.

  • Smith, Charles Saumarez. “Museums, Artefacts, and Meanings”. The New Museology, ed. Peter Vergo. London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 1989. 6–21.

  • Šapoka, Kęstutis. “Antimuziejus kaip procesuali atmintis: Alytaus avangardizmo atvejis” [Anti-Museum as a Processual Memory: Avant-garde Case of Alytus]. Lietuvos kultūros tyrimai 2: Muziejai, paveldas, vertybės, ed. Rita Repšienė, Vilnius: Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas, 2012. 32–46.

  • Trilupaitytė, Skaidra. “Pamąstymai apie auksinę kolekciją” [Thoughts on Golden Collection]. Dailė (No. 2, 2010): 4–6.

  • Vergo, Peter. “Introduction”. The New Museology, ed. Peter Vergo. London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 1989. 1–5.

  • Vergo, Peter. “The Reticent Object”. The New Museology, ed. Peter Vergo. London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 1989. 41–59.

  • Wallach, Alan. In Exhibition Contradiction. University of Massachusetts Press, 1998.

  • Žukauskienė, Odeta. “Muziejų kultūra: kintantys diskursai ir institucinė kritika” [Museum Culture: Changing Discourses and Institutional Critique] Lietuvos kultūros tyrimai 2: Muziejai, paveldas, vertybės, ed. Rita Repšienė, Vilnius: Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas, 2012. 14–31.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search