Internationalization of Japanese Business Groups – Literature Review

Open access


The internationalization of Japanese business groups (JBG) have been subject to intense scrutiny since JBG shot to world stage in the 1980’s. Studies on the internationalization of JBG have been fragmented in scope and have mainly focused on specific behaviors e.g. mode of market entry, knowledge creation, knowledge flows between headquarters and overseas subsidiaries, overseas market development and sales strategies, to name a few. Little attention has been paid, however, to explaining the reasons behind these behaviors. This literature review aims to contribute to filling this gap by recognizing the internationalization’s embeddedness in the country’s institutional environment, thus providing a more nuanced understanding of the drivers behind these behaviors as well as the intrinsic obstacles that may hinder the outcomes of these internationalization efforts. This study also hopes to answer the theoretical question called for by (Zaheer, Gözübüyük and Milanov, 2010) in their excellent work “It’s the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research: “How do organizations balance the benefits of trust and embeddedness with the costs of lock-in and inflexibility with the same set of partners?” The holistic perspective of this review has wide ranging managerial implications in terms of effective intra-organizational dialogue, stakeholder management, organizational knowledge management, among others.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Abegglen J.C. (1980). The Japanese Factory [online] Available at: [Accessed 3 October 2018].

  • [2] Akutsu S. and Katsumura F. (2016) ‘組織力強化プロセスとしての 企業ブランディングとその効果’ Japan Marketing Journal 36(1) pp. 2-23.

  • [3] Aoki M. and Dore R. (1994). The Japanese Firm: Sources of Competitive Strength Journal of Japanese Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • [4] Aoki M. and Patrick H. (1994). The Japanese main bank system: Its relevance for developing and transforming economies (Book Review) - by Rajan R.G. Journal of Economic Literature 34(3) pp. 1363-1365.

  • [5] Belderbos R. A. and Heijltjes M. G. (2005). The determinants of expatriate staffing by Japanese multinationals in Asia: Control learning and vertical business groups Journal of International Business Studies 36(3) pp. 341-354.

  • [6] Belderbos R. Ito B. and Wakasugi R. (2008). Intra-firm technology transfer and R&D in foreign affiliates: Substitutes or complements? Evidence from Japanese multinational firms Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 22(3) pp. 310-319.

  • [7] Bhappu A. D. (2000). The Japanese family: An institutional logic for Japanese corporate networks and Japanese management Academy of Management Review 25(2) pp. 409-415.

  • [8] Borgatti S. P. and Foster P. C. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research : A Review and Thypology Journal of Management 29(6) pp. 991-1013.

  • [9] Borgatti S. P. and Halgin D. S. (2011). On Network Theory Organization Science 22(5) pp. 1168-1181.

  • [10] Calori R. Baden-Fuller C. and Hunt B. (2000). Managing Change at Novotel: Back to the Future Long Range Planning. [online] Available at: [Accessed 16 October 2018].

  • [11] Carneiro J. da Rocha A. and da Silva J. F. (2008). Challenging the uppsala internationalization model: a contingent approach to the internationalization of services BAR - Brazilian Administration Review 5(2) pp. 85-103.

  • [12] Chan C. M. Isobe T. and Makino S. (2008). Which country matters? Institutional development and foreign affiliate performance Strategic Management Journal 29(11) pp. 1178-1205.

  • [13] Choi Y.R Zahra S.A. Yoshikawa T. and Han B.H. (2015). Family ownership and R&D investment: The role of growth opportunities and business group membership Part of the Asian Studies Commons and the Strategic Management Policy Commons Journal of Business Research 68(5) pp. 1053-1061.

  • [14] Collinson S. and Rugman A. M. (2008). The regional nature of Japanese multinational business Journal of International Business Studies 39(2) pp. 215-230.

  • [15] Collinson S. and Wilson D. C. (2006). Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate Organization Studies 27(9) pp. 1359-1387.

  • [16] D’Aunno T. Sutton R. I. and Price R. H. (1991). Isomorphism and External Support in Conflicting Institutional Environments: A Study Of Drug Abuse Treatment Units Academy of Management Journal 34(3) pp. 636-661.

  • [17] Delios A. and Beamish P. W. (2005). Regional and Global Strategies of Japanese Firms MIR: Management International Review. Springer 45(1) pp. 19-36.

  • [18] Dokko G. Kane A. A. and Tortoriello M. (2014). One of Us or One of My Friends: How Social Identity and Tie Strength Shape the Creative Generativity of Boundary-Spanning Ties Organization Studies 35(5) pp. 703-726.

  • [19] Dore R. P. (1973). British factory Japanese factory: the origins of national diversity in ... [online] Available at: [Accessed 3 October 2018].

  • [20] Dujarric R. and Hagiu A. (2009). Capitalizing On Innovation: The Case of Japan’ Harvard Business School pp. 1-45. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2018].

  • [21] Dunning J. H. Fujita M. and Yakova N. (2007). Some macro-data on the regionalisation/globalisation debate: A comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis Journal of International Business Studies 38(1) pp. 177-199.

  • [22] Etzioni A. (1965). Dual leadership in complex organizations American sociological review 30(5) pp. 688-698

  • [23] Federation J.B. (2015). A Survey of Global Human Resource Development. [online] Available at: