Livelihood assessment in district 1 of Medellin – Colombia

Ciro Alfonso Serna Mendoza 1 , Miroslawa Czerny 2 , Abraham Allec Londoño Pineda 3  and Oscar Alonso Velez Rojas 4
  • 1 Universidad de Manizales, Director of the PhD program in Sustainable Development, Columbia
  • 2 Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, Poland
  • 3 Coordinator of the International Relations and Business Group School as Economic and Administrative Sciences, Universidad de Medellin, Colombia.
  • 4 Professor International Business, Universidad de Medellin, Colombia


The livelihood approach aims at the analysis, understanding and restrictions that the poorest people have to face in order to recover from difficult situations. The Department for International Development model is applied to an urban zone with the purpose of making an assessment of the livelihood of the district ’la Comuna 1’ in Medellin, Colombia, which has been recognised as the poorest and one of the most dangerous districts of the city. The case study presents both a quantitative analysis (macro) and qualitative (micro) analysis, as a mixed method that allows a more complete analysis and understanding of livelihood, and providing a deeper understanding of the district from the livelihood approach. The results indicate a stable growth of livelihood during the period of analysis.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alcaldía de Medellín 2006, Mapa de Medellín 2006, Available from <>. [5 June 2015].

  • Alcaldía de Medellín 2009, Medellín todos por la vida, Alcaldía de Medellín, Medellín.

  • Alcaldía de Medellín 2013, Alcaldía de Medellín, Available from: <>. [27 April 2015].

  • Anand, S & Sen, A 1997, Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional perspective”, Human Development Papers 1997, Human Development Report Office, UNDP, New York.

  • Bicknell, J, Dodman, D & Satterthwaite, D 2009, Adapting cities to climate change: Understanding and addressing the development challenges, Earthscan, London.

  • BID 2008, Seguridad Ciudadana, Available from: <,5678.html>. [2 June 2015].

  • Boggia, A & Cortina, C 2010, “Measuring sustainable development using a multicriteria model A case study”, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, pp. 2301–2306.

  • CARE 2015, Care Foundation, Available from: <>. [30 May 2015].

  • Carney, D, Drinkwater, M, Rusinow, T, Neefjes, K, Wanmali, S & Singh, N 1999, Livelihoods approaches compared, Department for International Development, London.

  • Carney, D 1998, Sustainable rural livelihoods: What contribution can we make?, Department for International Development, London.

  • Carr, E 2014, “From description to explanation: Using the livelihoods as intimate government (LIG) approach”, Applied Geography, vol.52, pp.110–122.

  • Chambers, R & Conway, R 1992, ‘Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century’, Disussion paper, vol. 296, pp. 1–29.

  • Comuna Popular, 2014, Comuna Popular, Available from: <>. [2 June 2015].

  • De la Espriella, C 2007, “Designing for equality: Conceptualising a tool for strategic territorial planning”, Habitat International, vol. 31, pp.317–332.

  • DFID, 1999, Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets, DFID, London.

  • Donohue, C & Biggs, E 2015, “Monitoring socio enviromental change for sustainable development: developing a multidimensional livelihoods index”, Applied Geography, vol. 62, pp.391–403.

  • El Colombiano 2015a, New York Times destaca la transformación de Medellín, Available from: <>. [25 May 2015].

  • El Colombiano 2015b, La ciudad con mayor reducción de tasas de homicidios, Available from: <;>. [2 June 2015].

  • El Espectador 2013, Medellinizar, Available from: <>. [25 May 2015].

  • El Espectador 2015, Medellín es una Uva, Available from: <;> [2 June 2015].

  • Forbes 2014, The transformation of Medellín and the surprising company behind it. Available from<ín-andthe-surprising-compañy-behind-it/>. [15 June 2015].

  • Foster, J & Sen, A 1997, On economic inequality after a quarter century. En on economic inequality,Claredon Paperbacks, Oxford.

  • Fussel, H & Klein, R 2006, “Climate change vulnerability assessment: an evolution of conceptual thinking” Climatic Change, vol.75, no.3, pp. 301–329.

  • Heinrichs, D & Bernet, J 2014, “Public transport and accessibility in informal settlements: Aerial cable cars in Medellín Colombia”, Trasportation Research Procedia, vol.4, pp.55–67.

  • IPC 2010, Preocupación por casos de explotación sexual, Available from: <>. [5 June 2015].

  • IPCC 2014, ‛Summary for policymakers’ in Climate Change 2014, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom and New York.

  • KEI 2005, ‛Knowledge economy indicators’, Work Package 7, State of the Art Report on Simulation and Indicators, Knowledge Economy Indicators.

  • Kondyli, J 2010, “Measurement and evaluation of sustainable development A composite indicator for the islands of the North Aegean region, Greece”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 30, pp.347–356.

  • Krantz, L 2001, The sustainable livelihoods approach to poverty reduction, Sida, Swedish.

  • Kumar, R, Murty, H, Gupta, S & Dikshit, A 2012, “An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies”, Ecological indicators, vol.15, pp.281–299.

  • Londoño, A, Vélez, O & Rojas, J 2015, “ Evaluación del grado de preparación para asumir el reto de la internacionalización de las pymes desde un enfoque integrador de las capacidades dinámicas y la gestión del conocimiento”, Espacios, vol. 36, no.7.

  • Londoño, A 2015, “El enfoque de gobernanza en la evaluación del desarrollo sostenible a escala local (caso del departamento de Antioquia, Colombia)”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, no. 12, pp. 257–263.

  • Lotero, J 2003, “Las relaciones del desarrollo económico con la geografía y el territorio: una revisión”, Borradores del CIE, pp.1–35.

  • Maxneef, M 2007, Human scale development: conception, application and further reflections, Available from <>. [14 March 2015].

  • Ortiz, W 2011, Los parques bibliotecas en la ciudad de Medellín, Medellín.

  • Pelling, M 2003, The vulnerability of cities. Natural disasters and social resilience, Earthscan, London.

  • Rebotier, J 2012, “Vulnerability conditions and risk representations in Latin-America: Framing the territorializing urban risk”, Global Environmental Change, vol. 22, pp. 391–398.

  • Romero, P, Hughes, S, Qin, H, Hardoy, J, Rosas, A, Borquez, R & Lampis, A 2014,” Scale, urban risk and adaptation capacity in neighborhoods of Latin American cities”, Habitat International, vol.42, pp.224–235.

  • Ruta, N 2014, La transformación de Medellín se visualiza durante el foro urbano mundial, Available from: <>. [25 May 2015].

  • Schuschny, A. & Soto, H 2009, Guía metodológica Diseño de indicadores compuestos de desarrollo sostenible, Naciones Unidas-CEPAL, Santiago de Chile.

  • Scoones, I 1998, ‛Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. In IDS’, Working Paper 72, IDS, Brighton, UK.

  • Solesbury, W 2003, Sustainable livelihoods: A case study of the evolution of DFID policy. In Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper 217, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.

  • Sepúlveda, S 2008, Metodología para estimar el nivel de desarrollo sostenible en teritorios, IICA, San José.

  • Sepúlveda, S, Chavarría, H & Rojas, P 2005, Metodología para estimar el nivel de desarrollo sostenible de los territorios rurales (El Biograma), IICA, San José.

  • UNDP 1992, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development,United Nations, Rio de Janeiro.

  • Velez, O 2015, “Adaptación ciudadana a las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en “Smart Cities” desde una perspectiva de la educación para el desarrollo sostenible, caso Medellín-Colombia”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, no.7, pp. 487–494.

  • WCED 1987, Our common future: The Report of the Wolrd Commission on Enviroment and Development, Oxford Universiy Press, New York.


Journal + Issues