“Metropolregionen” in Germany: The Enforcement of Global City-Regions

  • 1 Institute for European Urban Studies, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Deutschland

Abstract

Under the conditions of globalisation, economic success has been related in politics and theoretical debate to the strength of regions. The concept of the region has therefore also been strengthened in Germany. Within the architecture of a historically grown political landscape, the implementation of the new forms of so-called metropolitan governance, however, has had limited effects. While the limits of “new regionalism” in Germany – by the federal organisation of political geography – are evident, the very idea of regional governance is also to be challenged. Therefore, the article discusses whether the introduction of “Metropolitan regions” can be regarded in the light of the international research on global city-regions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amin, A & Thirft, N 1992, City: reimaging the urban, Polity Press, Cambridge.

  • Baudner, J & Bull, MJ 2013, ‛The Europeanisation of national institutions reassessed: A comparison of regional policies in Germany and Italy’, Comparative European Politics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 201–221.

  • Brenner, N 2004, New state spaces – Urban governance and the rescaling statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Donald, B, Glasmeyer, A, Gray, M & Lobao, L 2014, ‛Austerity in the city: economic crisis and urban service decline’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 7, pp. 3–15.

  • Eckardt, F 2006, ‛Innovation of Institutional Capacity in German Regions’ in Synergy in Urban Networks, ed W Salet, Sdu Publishers, Den Haag, pp. 161–183.

  • Gebhardt. C 2012, ‛The Entrepreneurial State; The German Entrepreneuerial Regions Programme’, European Planning Studies, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1469–1482.

  • Growe, A 2013, ‛Regionalisierungsprozesse von wissensintensiven Dienstleistungsaktivitäten: Veränderung des Stadt-Umland-Verhältnisses im deutschen Städtesystem’, Raumforschung und Raumordnung, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 129–142.

  • Hackworth, JR 2007, The neoliberal city: governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.

  • Harding, A 2007, ‛Taking city regions seriously? Response to on “city regions”: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 31, pp. 443–458.

  • Harrison, J & Growe, A 2014, ‛From places to flows? Planning for the new “regional world” in Germany’, European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–41.

  • Heinelt, H & Zimmermann, K 2011, ‛How can we explain diversity in metropolitan governance within a country? Some reflections on recent developments in Germany’, International journal of urban and regional research, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1175–1193.

  • Hesse, M & Leick, A 2013, ‛Wachstum, Innovation, Metropolregion. Zur Rekonstruktion des jüngeren Leitbildwandels in der deutschen Raumentwicklungspolitik’, Raumforschung und Raumordnung, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 343–359.

  • Jeffery, C, Pamphilis, NM, Rowe, C & Turner, E 2014, ‛Regional policy variation in Germany: the diversity of living conditions in a “unitary federal state”’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1350–1366.

  • Jessop, B 2002, ‛Time and space in globalization of capital and their implications for state power’, Rethinking Marxism, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 97–116.

  • Jones, M & Ward, K 2002, ‛A world of regionalism? Towards a US-UK urban and regional policy framework comparison’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 377–401.

  • Knapp, W & Schmitt, P 2008, ‛Discourse on metropolitan driving forces and uneven development: Germany and the Rhine Ruhr Conurbation’, Regional Studies, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1187–1204.

  • Lord, A 2009, ‛Mind the gap. The theory and practice of state rescaling: Institutional Morphology and the ‘New’ City-regionalism’, Space & polity, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 77–92.

  • Pijneburg, K & Kholodilin, KA 2014, ‛Do regions with entrepreneurial neighbours perform better? A spatial econometric approach for German Regions’, Regional studies, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 866–882.

  • Scott, A (ed) 2001, Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Soja, EW 2014, My Los Angeles: from urban restructuring to regional urbanization, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley

  • Terlouw, K 2013,‛Four centuries of translocal development in cities and regions in Northwest Germany’, Globalizations, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 871–886.

  • Tonkiss, F 2013, ‛Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city’, City, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 312–324.

  • Walter-Rogg, M 2013, ‛Metropolitan governance over federal state borders in Germany: the example of the regions of Hamburg and Central Germany’ in Governance and finance of metropolitan areas in federal system, ed E Slack, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 106–154.

  • Zimmermann, K 2012, ‛Regionalreformen im Vergleich: München, Rhein-Neckar, Rhein-Main, Stuttgart und Hannover’ in Die diskutierte Region: Probleme und Planungsansätze der Metropolregion Rhein-Main, ed J Monstadt, Campus, Frankfurt, pp. 315–334.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search