The location choice of graduate entrepreneurs in the United Kingdom

Open access

Abstract

The graduates’ startup formation process represents a possible future role for universities in the form of active-participation, when speaking of the regional development. Tracking the path of entrepreneurial graduates who are moving between home, university, and employment, allows us to identify the specific motives that determine their migration decisions. The choice of location of graduate entrepreneurs is naturally affected by the context of their home region, as the availability of resources leads to a rising entrepreneurial intention. Similarly, the location of the startups flourish in densely populated urban regions, as well as in wealthier locations. At the same time, the vibrancy of the local entrepreneurial ecosystems is enhanced through mutual exchange and collaboration; and the higher the number of startups already present in a region, the higher the probability becomes for interaction and creativity. A leading tendency, not least to be mentioned, is that the preference to start new businesses is connected to highly-skilled creative sectors of the economy.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acs ZJ Anselin L & Varga A 2002 ‘Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge’ Research Policy vol. 31 no. 7 pp. 1069–1085.

  • Acs ZJ Audretsch DB & Lehmann EE 2013 ‘The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship’ Small Business Economics vol. 41 no. 4 pp. 757–774.

  • Acs ZJ Braunerhjelm P Audretsch DB & Carlsson B 2009 ‘The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship’ Small Business Economics vol. 32 no. 1 pp. 15–30.

  • Acs ZJ & Sanders M 2012 ‘Patents knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurship’ Small Business Economics vol. 39 no. 4 pp. 801–817.

  • Aldridge TT & Audretsch D 2011 ‘The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship’ Research Policy vol. 40 no. 8 pp. 1058–1067.

  • Anderson S Culkin N Penaluna A & Smith K 2014 ‘University and colleges role’ in An education system fit for an entrepreneur. Fifth Report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Micro Businesses pp. 57–80.

  • Anselin L Varga A & Acs Z 1997 ‘Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations’ Journal of Urban Economics vol. 42 no. 3 pp. 422–448.

  • Anselin L Varga A & Acs Z 2000 ‘Geographical spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric perspective’ Growth and Change vol. 31 no. 4 pp. 501–515.

  • Armington C & Acs ZJ 2002 ‘The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation’ Regional Studies vol. 36 no. 1 pp. 33–45.

  • Arrow K 1962 ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’ in The rate and direction of inventive activity ed RR Nelson Princeton Princeton University Press pp. 609–626.

  • Ashcroft B Love JH & Malloy E 1991 ‘New firm formation in the British counties with special reference to Scotland’ Regional Studies vol. 25 no. 5 pp. 395–409.

  • Åstebro T Bazzazian N & Braguinsky S 2012 ‘Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy’ Research Policy vol. 41 no. 4 pp. 663–677.

  • Audretsch DB 1995 ‘Innovation growth and survival’ International Journal of Industrial Organization vol. 13 no. 4 pp. 441–457.

  • Audretsch DB Aldridge TT & Sanders M 2011 ‘Social capital building and new business formation: A case study in Silicon Valley’ International Small Business Journal vol. 29 no. 2 pp. 152–169.

  • Audretsch DB & Fritsch M 1994 ‘The geography of firm births in Germany’ Regional Studies vol. 28 no. 4 pp. 359365.

  • Audretsch DB Lehmann EE & Warning S 2005 ‘University spillovers and new firm location’ Research Policy vol. 34 no. 7 pp. 1113–1122.

  • Audretsch DB & Vivarelli M 1996 ‘Determinants of new firm startups in Italy’ Empirica vol. 23 no. 1 pp. 91–105.

  • Autant-Bernard C Fadairo M & Massard N 2013 ‘Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence’ Research Policy vol. 42 no. 1 pp. 196–210.

  • Baltzopoulos A & Broström A 2013 ‘Attractors of entrepreneurial activity: Universities regions and alumni entrepreneurs’ Regional Studies vol. 47 no. 6 pp. 934–949.

  • Bishop P 2012 ‘Knowledge diversity and entrepreneurship: a spatial analysis of new firm formation in Great Britain’ Entrepreneurship & Regional Development vol. 24 no. 7-8 pp. 641–660.

  • Bosma N Van Stel A & Suddle K 2008 ‘The geography of new firm formation: Evidence from independent start-ups and new subsidiaries in the Netherlands’ International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal vol. 4 no. 2 pp. 129–146.

  • Bosma N 2011 ‘Entrepreneurship Urbanization Economies and Productivity of European Regions’ Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development Cheltenham: Edward Elgar pp. 107–132.

  • Brixy U & Grotz R 2007 ‘Regional patterns and determinants of birth and survival of new firms in Western Germany’ Entrepreneurship & Regional Development vol. 19 no. 4 pp. 293–312.

  • Broström A 2013 ‘Learning and bonding: what do entrepreneurs have to gain from higher education?’ 35th DRUID Celebration Conference June 1719 2013 Barcelona.

  • Brzozowska A Glinka B & Postuła A 2014. ‘Role of university in creating entrepreneurial Attitudes’ Horyzonty Wychowania vol. 13 no. 26 pp. 51–71.

  • Buenstorf G & Klepper S 2010 ‘Why does entry cluster geographically? Evidence from the US tire industry’ Journal of Urban Economics vol. 68 no. 2 pp. 103–114.

  • Van Burg E Romme AGL Gilsing VA & Reymen IMMJ 2008 ‘Creating university spin-offs: A science-based design perspective’ Journal of Product Innovation Management vol. 25 no. 2 pp. 114–128.

  • Burt RS 1992 ‘Structural holes: The social structure of competition’ Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Carlton DW 1983 ‘The location and employment choices of new firms: An econometric model with discrete and continuous endogenoud variables’ The Review of Economics and Statistics vol. 65 no. 3 pp. 440–449.

  • Colombelli A Quatraro F Torino P & Alberto CC 2013 ‘New firm formation and the properties of local knowledge bases: Evidence from Italian NUTS 3 regions’ 35th DRUID Celebration Conference June 1719 2013 Barcelona.

  • Colombo MG D‘Adda D & Piva E 2010 ‘The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis’ The Journal of Technology Transfer vol. 35 no. 1 pp. 113–140.

  • Cooke P Asheim BT Boschma R Martin R Schwartz D & Tödtling F 2011 Handbook of regional innovation and growth Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Dahl MS & Sorenson O 2009 ‘The embedded entrepreneur’ European Management Review vol. 6 no. 3 pp. 172–181.

  • Dahl MS & Sorenson O 2010 ‘The social attachment to place’ Social Forces vol. 89 no. 2 pp. 633–658.

  • Danis WM De Clercq D & Petricevic O 2011 ‘Are social networks more important for new business activity in emerging than developed economies? An empirical extension’ International Business Review vol. 20 no. 4 pp. 394–408.

  • Davidsson P & Honig B 2003 ‘The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs’ Journal of Business Venturing vol. 18 no. 3 pp. 301–331.

  • Dawson C Henley A & Latreille P 2012 ‘Individual motives for choosing self-employment in the UK: Does region matter?’ Regional Studies vol. 48 no. 5 pp. 804–822.

  • D‘Este PD Mahdi S Neely A & Rentocchini F 2012 ‘Inventors and entrepreneurs in academia: What types of skills and experience matter?’ Technovation vol. 32 no. 5 pp. 293–303.

  • Egeln J Gottschalk S & Rammer C 2004 ‘Location decisions of spin-offs from public research institutions’ Industry and Innovation vol. 11 no. 3 pp. 207–223.

  • Faggian A & McCann P 2006 ‘Human capital flows and regional knowledge assets: a simultaneous equation approach’ Oxford Economic Papers vol. 58 no. 3 pp. 475–500.

  • Faggian A & McCann P 2008 ‘Human capital graduate migration and innovation in British regions’ Cambridge Journal of Economics vol. 33 no. 2 pp. 317–333.

  • Faggian A & McCann P 2009 ‘Universities agglomerations and graduate human capital mobility’ Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie vol. 100 no. 2 pp. 210–223.

  • Fotheringham AS 1986 ‘Modelling hierarchical destination choice’ Environment and Planning A vol. 18. no. 3 pp. 401–418.

  • Fritsch M & Aamoucke R 2013 ‘Regional public research higher education and innovative start-ups: an empirical investigation’ Small Business Economics vol. 41 no. 4 pp. 865–885.

  • Fritsch M. & Mueller P 2007 ‘The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time-assessing the potential of policy promotion programs’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics vol. 17 no. 3 pp. 299–315.

  • Van Geenhuizen M & Soetanto DP 2012 ‘Open innovation among university spin-off firms: What is in it for them and what can cities do?’ Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences vol. 25 no. 2 pp. 191–207.

  • Giarratana MS 2004 ‘The birth of a new industry: entry by startups and the drivers of firm growth’ Research Policy vol. 33 no. 5 pp. 787–806.

  • Gibb A Haskins G & Robertson I 2013 ‘Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions’ in Universities in Change Innovation Technology and Knowledge Management ed A Altmann & B Ebersberger Springer Science + Business Media pp. 945.

  • Glinka B & Thatchenkery T 2013 ‘A comparative study of perceptions towards entrepreneurship in India Poland and the USA’ International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management vol. 13 no. 23 pp. 119–135.

  • Goethner M Obschonka M Silbereisen RK & Cantner U 2012 ‘Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants’ Journal of Economic Psychology vol. 33 no. 3 pp. 628–641.

  • Greve A. & Salaff JW 2003 ‘Social networks and entrepreneurship’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice vol. 28 no. 1 pp. 122.

  • Griliches Z 1979 ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth’ Bell Journal of Economics vol. 10 no. 1 pp. 92–116.

  • Guerini M Bonaccorsi A Rossi-Lamastra C & Colombo M 2012 ‘The spatial range of university knowledge and the creation of knowledge intensive firms’ DRUID 2012 Conference June 1921 2012 Copenhagen.

  • Harrison RT & Leitch CM 2005 ‘Entrepreneurial learning: Researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice vol. 29 no. 4 pp. 351–371.

  • Heblich S & Slavtchev V 2013 ‘Parent universities and the location of academic startups’ Small Business Economics vol. 42 no. 1 pp. 115.

  • Higher Education Statistics Agency 2013. Destinations of Leavers Survey. Available from: <https://www.hesa.ac.uk/stats-dlhe>.

  • Higher Education Statistics Agency 2013. Students in Higher Education. Available from: <https://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_pubs&task=show_pub_detail&pubid=1&Itemid=286>.

  • Hoare A & Corver M 2010 ‘The regional geography of new young graduate labour in the UK’ Regional Studies vol. 44 no. 4 pp. 477–494.

  • Hsu DH Roberts EB & Eesley CE 2007 ‘Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT’ Research Policy vol. 36 no. 5 pp. 768–788.

  • Jacobs J 1969 The economy of cities New York Random House.

  • Jaffe AB 1989 ‘The real effects of academic research’ American Economic Review vol. 79 no. 5 pp. 957–970.

  • Jaffe AB Trajtenberg M & Henderson R 1993 ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics vol. 108 no. 3 pp. 577–598.

  • Johnes J. & Taylor J 1989 ‘The first destination of new graduates: comparison between universities’ Applied Economics vol. 21 no. 3 pp. 357–373.

  • Johnes G Taylor J & Ferguson G 1987 ‘The employability of new graduates: a study of differences between UK universities’ Applied Economics vol. 19 no. 5 pp. 695–710.

  • Landry R Amara N & Rherrad I 2006 ‘Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities’ Research Policy vol. 35. no. 10 pp. 1599–1615.

  • Lasch F 2011 ‘Beyond the concept of human and social capital: the impact of the regional environment on high-tech venturing’ International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business vol. 14 no. 1 pp. 56–76.

  • Lawton Smith H Chapman D Wood P Barnes T & Romeo S 2014 ‘Entrepreneurial academics and regional innovation systems: the case of spin-offs from London‘s universities’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy vol. 32 no. 2 pp. 341–359.

  • Lee IH Hong E & Sun L 2013 ‘Regional knowledge production and entrepreneurial firm creation: Spatial dynamic analyses ’ Journal of Business Research vol. 66 no. 10 pp. 2106–2115.

  • Malecki EJ 1997 ‘The R&D location decision of the firm and “creative” regions - a survey’ Technovation vol. 6 no. 3 pp. 205–222.

  • Michelacci C & Silva O 2007 ‘Why so many local entrepreneurs?’ The Review of Economics and Statistics vol. 89 no. 4 pp. 615–633.

  • Mueller SL & Thomas AS 2001 ‘Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness’ Journal of Business Venturing vol. 16 no. 1 pp. 51–75.

  • Mueller SL Thomas AS & Jaeger AM 2002 ‘National entrepreneurial potential: The role of culture economic development and political history’ in Advances in Comparative International Management eds MA Hitt & JLC Cheng vol. 14 pp. 221–257.

  • Müller K 2010 ‘Academic spin-off‘s transfer speed Analyzing the time from leaving university to venture’ Research Policy vol. 39 no. 2 pp. 189–199.

  • Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency 2013. LGD Claimant Count Annual Averages. Available from: <http://www.ninis2.nisra.gov.uk/public/Theme.aspx?themeNumber=18&themeName=Labour%20Market>.

  • Office for National Statistics 2013. Business Demography. Available from: <http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/bus-register/business-demography/index.html>.

  • Office for National Statistics 2013. Mid-year Population Estimates. Available from: <http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-319259>.

  • Office for National Statistics 2013. Nomis. Available from: <https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/>.

  • O‘Shea RP Chugh H & Allen T 2008 ‘Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: A conceptual framework’ The Journal of Technology Transfer vol. 33 no. 6 pp. 653–666.

  • Pickernell D Packham G Jones P Miller C & Thomas B 2011 ‘Graduate entrepreneurs are different: They access more resources?’ International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research vol. 17 no. 2 pp. 183–202.

  • Piróg D 2014a ‘Destinations of geography graduates on the labour market in Poland and other countries’ Geographia Polonica vol. 87 no. 1 pp. 95–112.

  • Piróg D 2014b. ‘Do geography degree programmes facilitate a smooth transition to the job market? Reflections of working and job-seeking graduates in Poland’ Journal of Geography in Higher Education vol. 38 no. 2 pp. 155–174.

  • Plotnikova M Wadeson N & Ashcroft B 2010 ‘Extending shift-share decomposition through cluster analysis: An application to new firm formation in British counties’ Henley Business School University of Reading.

  • Qian H & Acs ZJ 2013 ‘An absorptive capacity of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship’ Small Business Economics vol. 40 no. 2 pp. 185–199.

  • Romer P 1990 ‘Endogenous technological change’ Journal of Political Economy vol. 98 no. 5 pp. 71–102.

  • Rothaermel FT Agung SD & Jiang L 2007 ‘University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature’ Industrial and Corporate Change vol. 16 no. 4 pp. 691–791.

  • Seddighi HR & Theocharous AL 2002 ‘A model of tourism destination choice: A theoretical and empirical analysis’ Tourism Management vol. 23 no. 5 pp. 475–487.

  • Shane S & Venkataraman S 2000 ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’ Academy of management review vol. 25 no. 1 pp. 217–226.

  • Soetanto DP & Van Geenhuizen M 2010 ‘Social capital through networks: The case of university spin-off firms in different stages’ Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie vol. 101 no. 5 pp. 509–520.

  • Storey DJ 1991 ‘The birth of new firms – Does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence’ Small Business Economics vol. 3 no. 3 pp. 167–178.

  • Sutaria V & Hicks DA 2004 ‘New firm formation: Dynamics and determinants’ The Annals of Regional Science vol. 38 no. 2 pp. 241–262.

  • Taylor J 1986 ‘The employability of graduates: Differences between universities’ Studies in Higher Education vol. 11 no. 1 pp. 17–27.

  • Varga A 2000 ‘Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity’ Journal of Regional Science vol. 40 no. 2 pp. 289–309.

  • Vincett PS 2010 ‘The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies and their implications for public policy’ Research Policy vol. 39 no. 6 pp. 736–747.

  • Wach K 2015 ‘Impact of Cultural and Social Norms on Entrepreneurship in the EU: Cross-Country Evidence based on GEM Survey Results’ Zarządzanie w Kulturze vol. 16 no. 1 pp. 15–29.

  • Wagner J & Sternberg R 2004 ‘Start-up activities individual characteristics and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data’ The Annals of Regional Science vol. 38 no. 2 pp. 219–240.

  • Woodward D Figueiredo O & Guimarães P 2006 ‘Beyond the Silicon Valley: University R&D and high-technology location’ Journal of Urban Economics vol. 60 no. 1 pp.15–32.

  • Wright M Mosey S & Noke H 2012 ‘Academic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: rethinking the role of the entrepreneur’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology vol. 21 no. 56 pp. 429–444.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.62

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.236
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.378

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
70 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 287 178 2
PDF Downloads 165 128 2