Towards a general theory of landscape systems: the integration of the geoecological and bioecological approaches

Open access

Abstract

Ever since its beginnings, landscape ecology has been developing in two different directions: the bioecological and the geoecological. While the bioecological approach is focused on the relationship between organisms and their abiotic environment, the geoecological approach is based on the relationship between human society and its, primarily abiotic, environment. Therefore, the geoecological approach can be applied in planning human use of the environment in a long term sustainable manner, while the bioecological approach could represent the basis for the planning of conservational and environmental usage. The merging of these two approaches will result in a comprehensive and more holistic landscape ecology, which will thus gain the potential for coordinating interdisciplinary landscape research and a more prominent role in contributing to spatial planning. The merge will also enhance attempts to create a general theory of landscape systems.

References

  • Ahern, J 2005, ‘Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning’ in From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application eds B Tress, G Tress, G Fry & P Opdam, Springer, Frankfurt, pp. 119–131.

  • Barsch, H, Bastian, O, Beierkuhnlein, C, Bosshard, A, Breuste, J, Klötzli, F, Otl, K, Tress, B, Tress, G & Weiland, U 2002, ‘Application of landscape ecology’ in Development and Perspectives of Landscape Ecology eds O Bastian & U Steinhardt, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 307–432.

  • Bastian, O 2001, ‘Landscape Ecology – towards a unified discipline?’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 16, pp. 757–766.

  • Bonnin, M, Bruszik, A, Rientjes, S, Delbaere, B, van Uden, G, Léthier, H, Richard, D & Terry, A 2007, The Pan-European Ecological Network: Taking Stock, United Nations, New York.

  • Botequilha-Leitão, A & Ahern, J 2002, ‘Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 59, pp. 65–93.

  • Brandt, J 1995, ‘Landscape ecology and the destiny of geography’, Landscape Ecological Papers, vol. 9, pp. 55–61.

  • Bryl, M & Łyczkowska, G 2010, ‘Spatial planning as an instrument for shaping an ecological network’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 77–83.

  • Chmielewski, TJ 2008, ‘Zmierzając ku ogólnej teorii systemów krajobrazowych’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, pp. 93–108.

  • Chmielewski, TJ 2011, ‘Landscape systems: spatial structure and speed of changes’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 30, pp. 23-30.

  • Chmielewski, TJ 2012, ‘Systemy krajobrazowe: Struktura – funkcjonowanie – planowanie’, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

  • Cieszewska, A 2000, ‘Comparative landscape structure studies for land use planning – Przedborski landscape park case study’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 6, pp. 54–62.

  • Clements, F & Shelford, V 1939, Bio-ecology, Jonh Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Cushman, S, Evans, J & McGarigal, K 2010, ‘Landscape Ecology: Past, Present and Future’ in Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation, eds E Landguth & F Huettmann, Springer, New York, pp. 65–82.

  • Drdoš, J 1996, ‘A reflection on landscape ecology’, Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 15, pp. 369–375.

  • Fahrig, L 2005, ‘When is a Landscape Perspective Important?’ in Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology, eds JA Wiens & MR Moss, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–10.

  • Farina, A 1993, ‘From global to regional landscape ecology’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 8, pp.153–154.

  • Farina, A & Belgrano, A 2004, ‘The eco-field: a new paradigm for landscape ecology’, Ecological Research, vol. 19, pp. 107–110.

  • Fernandes, J, Guiomar, N & Soares, A 2006, ‘Geometries in Landscape Ecology’, Journal of Mediterranean Ecology, vol. 7, no. 1-4, pp. 3–13.

  • Forman, RTT & Godron M 1986, Landscape ecology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Halás, M 2003, ‘Possibilities for the application of geography to land use planning’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Geographica, vol. 1, pp. 67–77.

  • Khoroshev, A 2010, ‘Multilevel analysis of landscape structure for land use decisions’ in Landscape ecology – methods, applications and interdisciplinary approach, eds M Barančoková, J Krajči, J Kollár & I Belčáková, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences and Institute of Garden and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, pp. 99–112.

  • Leser, H 1997, Landschaftsökologie, Ulmer, Stuttgart.

  • McAlpine, C, Seabrook, L, Rhodes, J, Maron, M, Smith, C, Bowen, M, Butler, S, Powell, O, Ryan, J, Fyfe, C, Adams-Hosking, C, Smith, A, Robertson, O, Howes, A & Cattarino, L 2010, ‘Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology's contribution to sustainable landscape planning’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 25, pp. 1155–1168.

  • Melnyk, A 2008, ‘Ecological analysis of landscapes’ in Methodology of landscape research, ed V Andreychouk, Sosnowiec, pp. 151–169.

  • Mezősi, G, Bárány-Kevei, I, Mucsi, L & Balogh, I 1993, ‘First results of GIS based geoecological mapping’, Acta Geographica Szegediensis, vol. 31, pp. 71–82.

  • Miklós, L 1994, Landscape ecological principles of the sustainable development, Roskilde University, Department of Geography and International Development Studies, Roskilde.

  • Miklós, L 1996, ‘Landscape-ecological theory and methodology: a goal oriented application of the traditional scientific theory and methodology to a branch of a new quality’, Ekológia (Bratislava), vol. 15, pp. 377–385.

  • Mizgajski, A, Breuste, J, Albert, C, Gruehn, D, Kozová, M, Miklós, L & Mörtberg, U 2010, ‘Implementation of landscape ecological knowledge – achievements and challenges’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 28, pp. 9–13.

  • Molles, M 2008, Ecology: Concepts and Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Moss, MR, 2000a, ‘Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology, and ‘The transformation of agricultural landscapes’’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 15, pp. 303–311.

  • Moss, MR 2000b, ‘Landscape ecology: the need for a discipline?’, The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 6, pp. 174–187.

  • Naveh, Z 1991, ‘Some remarks on recent developments in landscape ecology as a transdisciplinary ecological and geographical science’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 5, pp. 65–73.

  • Naveh, Z 2000, ‘What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 50, pp. 7–26.

  • Naveh, Z 2002, ‘Foreword’ in: Development and Perspectives of Landscape Ecology, eds O Bastian & U Steinhardt, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. xxi-xxvii.

  • Naveh, Z 2005, ‘The transformation of landscape ecology and restoration ecology into transdisciplinary sciences of holistic landscape study, management and planning, conservation and restoration’ in: Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 353–401

  • Neef, E 1967, Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Landschaftslehre, Hermann Haack: Geographisch-Kartographische Anstalt Gotha, Leipzig.

  • Neef, E 1982, ‘Stages in the development of landscape ecology’ in Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: Proceedings of the 1st International Congress in Landscape Ecology, eds S Tjallingii & A de Veer, Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp. 19–28.

  • Odum, E & Barrett, G 2005, Fundamentals of Ecology. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont.

  • Opdam, P, Foppen, R & Vos, C 2002, ‘Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 16, pp. 767–779.

  • Ostaszewska, K 2004, ‘Four fundamental methodological problems of landscape geography’, Miscellanea Geographica, vol. 11, pp. 13–17.

  • Pavić, R 1987, ‘Osnove kompleksne ekologije i geoekologije za geografe – temeljne definicije i prijedlog nastavnog plana’, Geografski glasnik, vol. 49, pp. 90–96.

  • Rambo, T 1983, Conceptual Approaches to Human Ecology, East-West Environment and Policy Institute, Honolulu.

  • Richerson, P, Mulder, M & Vila, B 1996, Principles of Human Ecology, Simon & Schuster, Needham Heights.

  • Richling, A & Solon, J 1996, Ekologia krajobrazu. PAN, Warszawa.

  • Termorshuizen, J, Opdam, P & van den Brink, A 2007, ‘Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 79, pp. 374–384.

  • Tress, G, Tress, B & Fry, G 2004, ‘Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 20, pp. 479–493.

  • Troll, C 1971, ‘Landscape ecology (geoecology) and biogeocenology: a terminological study’, GeoForum, vol. 8, pp. 43–46.

  • Turner, M 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 20, pp. 171–197.

  • Turner, M 2005, ‘Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science?’, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 36, pp. 319–344.

  • Wiens, JA 2002, ‘Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water’, Freshwater Biology, vol. 47, pp. 501–515.

  • Wiens, JA & Moss, MR 1999, ‘Preface’ in Issues in Landscape Ecology, eds JA Wiens & MR Moss, IALE, Snowmass.

  • Wu, J 2006, ‘Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, pp. 1–4.

  • Wu, J 2008, ‘Making the Case for Landscape Ecology: An Effective Approach to Urban Sustainability’, Landscape Journal, vol. 27, pp.1–8

  • Wu, J & Hobbs, RJ 2002, ‘Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 17, pp. 355–365.

  • Zonneveld, I 1972, Textbook of photo-interpretation, ITC, Enschede.

  • Zonneveld, I 1990, ‘Scope and Concepts of Landscape Ecology as an Emerging Science’ in Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective, eds I Zonneveld & RTT Forman, Springer, New York, pp. 3–20.

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.40

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.404

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
14 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 27 27 17
PDF Downloads 6 6 3