Main aspects of system hierarchy in ecological landscape research

Open access

Abstract

At present, geoecology-related discussions are focused on the ability to provide systematic and universal landscape description in a variety of space and time scales, as well as in different functional systems. This requires the development of landscape schemes in the form of hierarchical structural and functional systems. This paper has therefore focused on concepts of crucial importance for landscape system description, such as scale, spatial range and structure and landscape functioning. The definition of these concepts and their characteristics are crucial for the ability to describe a landscape system, in terms of its structural and functional composition and valuation, as well as assessment of landscape and ecosystem functions and services. Therefore, the analysis allows a demonstration of approaches discussed in the subject literature and the authors’ opinions.

Aaviksoo, K 1995, ‘Simulating vegetation dynamics and land use in a mire landscape using a Markov model’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 129–142.

Allen, TFH & Hoekstra, TW 1992, Toward a unified ecology, Columbia University Press, New York.

Allen, TFH & Starr, TB 1982, Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity, University Press, Chicago, London.

Ares, J., Bertiller, M & del Valle, H 2001, ‘Functional and structural landscape indicators of intensification, resilience and resistance in agroecosystems in southern Argentina based on remotely sensed data‘, Landscape Ecol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 221–234.

Auger, P & Lett, C 2003, ‘Integrative biology: linking levels of organization’, Comptes Rendus Biologie, vol. 326, no. 5, pp. 517–522.

Barsch, H 1979, ‘W sprawie pojęć dotyczących powłoki ziemskiej i jej przestrzennego rozczłonkowania w terminologii nauki o krajobrazie’ [On the concepts of the Earth surface and its spatial fragmentation in the terminology of the landscape science], Przegląd Zagranicznej Literatury Geograficznej, vol. 2, pp. 9–15.

Bailey, RG 1987, ‘Suggested hierarchy of criteria for multiscale ecosystem mapping’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.14, pp. 313–319.

Benito-Calvo, A, Pérez-González, A, Magri, O & Meza, P 2009, ‘Assessing regional geodiversity: the Iberian Peninsula’, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, vol. 34, pp. 1433–1445.

Bertalanffy von, L 1976, General system theory: foundations, development, applications, (Pub) George Braziller.

Bissonette, JA, 1997, ‘Scale-sensitive ecological properties: historical context, current meaning’ in Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale, ed JA Bissonette, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, pp. 3–15.

Blaschke, T & Petch, J 1999, ‘Landscape structure and scale: comparative studies on some landscape indices in Germany and the UK’ in Heterogeneity in landscape ecology: pattern and scale eds M Maudsley & J Marshall, IALE UK, Bristol, pp. 75–84.

Bugmann, H, Lindner, M, Lasch, P, Flechsig, M, Ebert, B & Cramer, W 2000, ‘Scaling issues in forest succession modelling’, Climatic Change, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 265–289.

Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, STA, Weathers, KC, Bell, SS, Benning, TL, Carreir, MM & Dawson, TE 2003a, ‘An interdisciplinary and synthetic approach to ecological boundaries’, BioScience, vol. 53, pp. 717–722.

Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, STA, Weathers, KC & Jones, CG 2003b, ‘A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries’, BioScience, vol. 53, pp. 750–758.

Chmielewski, T 2008, ‘Zmierzając ku ogólnej teorii systemów krajobrazowych’ [Towards a general theory of landscape systems], The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, pp. 93–108.

Corenblit, D, Baas, ACW, Bornette, G, Darrozes, J, Delmotte, S, Francis, RA, Gurnell, AM, Julien, F, Niman, RJ & Steiger, J 2011, ‘Feedbacks between geomorphology and biota controlling Earth surface processes and landforms: A review of foundation concepts and current understandings’, Earth Science Reviews, vol. 106, pp. 307–331.

Cushman, SA & McGarigal, K 2002, ‘Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships’, Landscape Ecol., vol. 17, pp. 637–646.

Dungan, JL, Perry, JN, Dale, MRT, Legendre, P, Citron-Pousty, S, Fortin, MJ, Jakomulska, A, Miriti, M & Rosenberg, MS 2002, ‘A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis’, Ecography, vol. 25, pp. 626–640.

Farina, A 2000, Landscape ecology in action, Springer, pp. 317.

Fjellstad, WJ & Dramstad, WE, 1999. ‘Patterns of change in two contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscapes’, Landscape Urban, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 177–191.

Fischer, J, Lindenmayer, DB, Fazey, I 2004, ‘Appreciating ecological complexity: habitat contours as a conceptual landscape model’, Conserv. Biol., vol. 18, pp. 1245–1253.

Forman, RTT & Godron, M 1986, Landscape Ecology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

Forman, RTT & Moore, PN 1992, ‘Theoretical foundations for understanding boundaries in landscape mosaics’, in Landscape Boundaries, eds AJ Hansen & F di Castri, Ecological Studies, vol. 92, Springer, New York, pp. 236–258.

Forman, RTT 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Garrett, KA & Dixon, PM 1997, ‘Environmental pseudointeraction: the effects of ignoring the scale of environmental heterogeneity in competition studies’, Theor. Popul. Biol., vol. 51, pp. 37–48.

Gibson, CC, Ostrom, E & Ahn, TK 2000, ‘The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey’, Ecological Economics, vol. 32, pp. 217–239.

Hansen, AJ & di Castri, F (eds) 1992, Landscape boundaries. Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows, Springer-Verlag, New York.

Hay, GJ, Dubé, P, Bouchard, A & Marceau, DJ 2002, ‘A scalespace primer for exploring and quantifying complex landscapes’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 27–49.

Hearnshaw, EJS, Cullen, R & Hughey, KFD, An ecological concept determined by economic means. Commerce division, Lincoln University, environment, society and design division, Lincoln University. Available from: http://www.een. anu.edu.au/e05prpap/hearnshaw.doc [2012.04.02].

King, AW 1991, ‘Translating models across scales in the landscape’, in Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity, eds MG Turner & RH Gardner, Springer, vol. 82, New York, pp. 470–517.

Kolasa, J 2006, ‘A community ecology perspective on variability in complex systems: The effects of hierarchy and integration’, Ecological Complexity, vol. 3, pp. 71–79.

Kolasa, J & Zalewski, M 1995, ‘Notes on ecotone attributes and functions’, Hydrobiologia, vol. 303, pp. 1–7.

Kondracki, J & Richling, A 1983, ‘Próba uporządkowania terminologii w zakresie geografii fizycznej kompleksowej’ [An attempt to organize the terms in comprehensive physical geography], Przegl. Geogr. vol. 55, no. 1.

Kostrzewski, A 2011, ‘The role of relief geodiversity in geomorphology’, Geographica Polonica, vol. 84, Spatial Issue, part 2, pp. 60–74.

Kozłowski, S 2004, ‘Geodiversity. The concept and scope of geodiversity’, Przegl. Geol., vol. 52, no.8/2.

Kozłowski, S, Migaszewski, Z & Gałuszka, A 2004, ‘Znaczenie georóżnorodności w holistycznej wizji przyrody’ [The importance of geodiversity in the holistic vision of nature], Przegl. Geol., vol. 52, no. 4.

Lechnio, J & Richling, A 2005, ‘Model funkcjonowania krajobrazu - ocena dynamiki z zastosowaniem analizy przepływów’ [Model of the landscape functioning - evaluation of dynamics using flow analysis] in Z Problematyki Funkcjonowania Krajobrazów Nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa.

Leser, H & Nagel, P 1998, ‘Landscape diversity – a holistic approach’ in Biodiversity. A Challenge for Development Research and Policy, eds W Barthloff & M Wininger, Berlin – Heidelberg – New York.

Levin, SA 1992, ‘The problem of pattern and scale in ecology’, Ecology, vol. 73, pp. 1943–1967.

Lindenmayer, D, Hobbs, RJ, Montague-Drake, R, Alexandra, J, Bennett, A, Burgman, M, Cale, P, Calhoun, A, Cramer, V, Cullen, P, Driscoll, D, Fahrig, L, Fischer, J, Franklin, J, Haila, Y, Hunter, M, Gibbons, P, Lake, S, Luck, G, MacGregor, C, McIntyre, S, Nally, RM, Manning, A, Miller, J, Mooney, H, Noss, R, Possingham, H, Saunders, D, Schmiegelow, F, Scott, M, Simberloff, D, Sisk, T, Tabor, G, Walker, B, Wiens, J, Woinarski, J & Zavaleta, E 2008, ‘A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation’, Ecology Letters, vol. 11, pp. 78–91.

Mander, Ü, Müller, F & Wrbka, T 2005, ‘Functional and structural landscape indicators: Upscaling and downscaling problems’, Ecological Indicators, vol. 5, pp. 267–272.

Manning, AD, Lindenmayer, DB & Nix, HA 2004, ‘Continua and umwelt: novel perspectives on viewing landscapes’, Oikos, vol. 104, pp. 621–628.

Manson, SM 2008, ‘Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human-environment systems’, Geoforum, vol. 39, pp. 776–788.

Marceau, D 1999, ‘The scale issue in social and natural sciences’, Can. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 25, pp. 347–356.

Marceau, DJ & Hay, GJ 1999 ‘Contributions of remote sensing to the scale issues’, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 25, pp. 357–366.

Marušič, J 1999, ‘Landscape typology as a basis for landscape protection and development’, Agriculturae Conseptus Stientificus, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 269–274.

McConnell, W 2002, ‘Meeting in the middle: The challenge of meso-level integration’, LUCC Report Series No. 5, Land Use Policy, vol. 19, pp. 99–101.

McGarigal, K & Marks, BJ 1995, FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW.

McGarigal, K, Tagil, S & Cushman, SA 2009, ‘Surface metrics: An alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 24, pp. 433– 450.

McIntyre, S & Hobbs, R 1999, ‘A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models’, Conserv. Biol., vol. 13, pp. 1282–1292.

Melbourne, BA & Chesson, P 2005, ‘Scaling up population dynamics: integrating theory and data’, Oecologia, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 179–187.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework For Assessment, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series. Island Press. Műller, F 1998, ‘Gradients in ecological systems’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 108, pp. 3–21.

Müller, J-P, Ratzé, C, Gillet, F & Stoffel, K 2011, Modeling And Simulating Hierarchies Using An Agent-Based Approach, MODSIM 2011. Available from: http://www.mssanz.org. au/ [2012.04.02].

Müller, F, Hoffmann-Kroll, R & Wiggering, H 2000, ‘Indicating ecosystem integrity–theoretical concepts and environmental requirements’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 130, pp. 13–23.

Naveh, Z 2001, ‘Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 57, pp. 269–284.

Nicolis, G & Prigogine, I 1989, Exploring complexity: An introduction, Freeman.

Norowi Mohd, H, Perry, JN, Powell, W & Rennolls, K 2000, ‘The effect of spatial scale on the interactions between two weevils and their parasitoid’, Ecol. Entomol., vol. 25, pp. 188–196.

O’Neill, RV & King, AW 1998, ‘Homage to St. Michael; or why are there so many books on scale?’ in Ecological scale: theory and applications, eds DL Peterson & VT Parker, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 3–16.

O’Neill, RV, DeAngelis, D, Waide, J & Allen, TFH 1986, A hierarchical concept of ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Papadimitriou, F 2002, ‘Modelling indicators and indices of landscape complexity: an approach using GIS’, Ecological Indicators, vol. 2, pp. 17–25.

Peters, DPC & Havstad KM 2006, ‘Nonlinear dynamics in arid and semi-arid systems: Interactions among drivers and processes across scales’, Journal of Arid Environments, vol. 65, pp. 196–206.

Peterson, GD 2000, ‘Scaling ecological dynamics: selforganization, hierarchical structure, and ecological resilience’, Climatic Change, vol. 44, pp. 291–309.

Peterson, DL & Parker, VT (eds) 1998, Ecological scale: theory and methods, Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 289–307.

Pickett, STA 1989, ‘Space-for-Time Substitution as an Alternative to Long-Term Studies’, in Long-term studies in ecology. Approaches and alternatives, ed GE Likens, Springer- Verlag, New York Inc., USA, pp. 110-135.

Pickup, G, Chewings, VH & Nelson, DJ 1993. ‘Estimating changes in vegetation cover over time in arid rangelands using Landsat MSS data’, Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 43, pp. 243–263.

Pietrzak, M 2009, ‘Aktualne i nieaktualne problemy ekologii krajobrazu’ [Current and outdated problems of landscape ecology], The Problems of Landscape Ecology , vol. 23, pp. 11–18.

Powell, DC 2000, Potential vegetation, disturbance, plant succession, and other aspects of forest ecology, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

Reynolds, JF & Wu, J 1999, ‘Do landscape structural and functional units exist?’ in Integrating Hydrology, Ecosystem Dynamics, and Biogeochemistry in Complex Landscapes, eds JD Tenhunen & P Kabat, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Richling, A 1992, Kompleksowa geografia fizyczna [Complex physical geography], Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.

Richling, A (ed) 1993, Metody szczegółowych badań geografii fizycznej [Methods of detailed studies of physical geography], PWN, Warszawa.

Richling, A 2004, ‘Systemy przyrodniczego podziału przestrzeni’ [The systems of natural delimitation of space], The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 14, pp. 17–22.

Richling, A & Lechnio, J (eds) 2005, Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes], WGSR UW, Warszawa.

Richling, A & Lechnio, J 2005, Koncepcja krajobrazu – operatory i indykatory ewolucji systemów przyrodniczych [Conception of the landscape – drivers and indicators of systems evolution] in Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa.

Richling, A & Solon, J 2011, Ekologia krajobrazu [Landscape Ecology], Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Schneider ED & Kay, JJ 1994, Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics, Mathl. Comput. Modeling, vol. 19, no 6–8, pp. 25–48.

Schneider, DC 2001, ‘The Rise of the Concept of Scale in Ecology’, BioScience, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 545–553.

Solon, J 2009, ‘O potrzebie standaryzacji badań ekologicznokrajobrazowych dla celów praktycznych’ [About the need for standardization of landscape-ecological research for practical purposes], The problems of landscape Ecology, vol. 23, pp. 19–28.

Steele, JH 1991, ‘Can ecological theory cross the land-sea boundary?’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 153, pp. 425–436.

Steinhardt, U & Volk, M 2003, ‘Meso-scale landscape analysis based on landscape balance investigations: problems and hierarchical approaches for their resolution’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 168, pp. 251–265.

Strayer, DL, Power, ME, Fagan, WF, Pickett, STA & Belnap J 2003, ‘A classification of ecological boundaries’, BioScience, vol. 53, pp. 723–729.

Tallis, HT, Ricketts, T, Guerry, AD, Wood, SA, Sharp, R, Nelson, E, Ennaanay, D,Wolny, S, Olwero, N, Vigerstol, K, Pennington, D, Mendoza, G, Aukema, J, Foster, J, Forrest, J, Cameron, D, Arkema, K, Lonsdorf, E, Kennedy, C, Verutes, G, Kim, CK, Guannel, G, Papenfus, M, Toft, J, Marsik, M, Bernhardt, J, Griffin, R, Głowiński, K, Chaumont, N, Perelman, A & Lacayo, M 2013, InVEST 2.5.6 User’s guide. The natural capital project, Stanford.

Turner, MG, Gardner, RH & O’Neill, RV 1995, ‘Ecological Dynamics at Broad Scales. Ecosystem and Landscapes’, BioScience, vol. 45, Supplement: science and biodiversity policy, pp. 29–35.

Turner, MG 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process’, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution System, vol. 20, pp. 171– 197.

Turner, MG 2005, ‘Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science?’, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution System, vol. 36, pp. 319–344.

Urban, DL, O’Neill, RV & Shugart, HH Jr 1987, ‘Landscape ecology. A hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns’, Bioscience, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 119–127.

Uuemaa, E, Roosaare, J, Kanal, A & Mander, Ü 2008, ‘Spatial correlograms of soil cover as an indicator of landscape heterogeneity’, Ecological Indicators, vol. 8, pp. 783–794.

Viktorov, AS, 1998, Matematicheskaya morfologiya landshafta (Mathematical Morphology of Landscape), Moscow, TRATEK.

Walz, U 2011, ‘Landscape Structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity’, Living Rev. Landscape Res., vol. 5, no. 3. Available from: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2011-3 [20.01.2012].

Wheatley, M & Johnson, C, 2009, ‘Factors limiting our understanding of ecological scale’, Ecological Complexity, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 150–159.

Wiens, JA 1989, ‘Spatial scaling in ecology’, Functional Ecology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 385–397.

Wilbanks, TJ & Kates, RW 1999, ‘Global change in local places: How scale matters’, Climatic Change, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 601–628.

Wolfram, S 1984, ‘Cellular automata as models of complexity’, Nature, vol. 311, pp. 419–424.

Wu, J 1999, ‘Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder’, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 367–380.

Wu, J 2004, ‘Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 125–138.

Wu, J & David, JL 2002, ‘A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 7–26.

Wu, J & Marceau, D 2002, ‘Modeling complex ecological systems: an introduction’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 1–6.

Wu, JA & Ye, Q 2000, ‘Dealing with scale in landscape analysis: An overview’, Geographic Information Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.1–5.

Wu, J & David, JL 2002, ‘A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 7–26.

Yarrow, MM & Salthe, SN 2008, ‘Ecological boundaries in the context of hierarchy theory’, BioSystems, vol. 92, pp. 233– 244.

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.73

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.404
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.759

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
14 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 80 80 36
PDF Downloads 36 36 23