Land cover as a factor affecting the structure and modifying the dynamics of a landscape system

Open access

Abstract

of the landscape from the viewpoint of the structure’s durability, characteristics and speed of change. The research focused on the area surrounding Płock.

In the analysed period (1987-2010) slight changes were detected with regard to the land cover, though they were significant in terms of the natural environment. No single dominant process determining land cover change was identified. Fluctuations prevailed (producing a slightly different picture in each microregion), with a fixed pattern maintained. Distribution, shape and spatial location of land cover types are only partly determined by land lie and habitat quality. Fragmentation of the terrain is relatively high, which reflects intense land use, at the same time indicating opportunities to preserve the wildlife and vegetation typical for agrocenoses.

Aaviksoo, K 1995, ‘Simulating vegetation dynamics and land use in a mire landscape using a Markov model’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 31, pp. 129–142.

Benz, UC, Willhauck, PG & Lingenfelder, M 2004, ‘Multiresolution, rbject-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information’, SPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, vol. 58, 239–258.

Blaschke, T & Hay, GJ 2001, ‘Object-oriented image analysis and scale-space: theory and methods for modeling and evaluating multiscale landscape structures’, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 34, part 4/W5, pp. 22–29.

eCognition Developer 8.64.0 User Guide, 2010, Trimble Documentation, München, Germany.

Griffiths, GH, Lee, J & Eversham, BC 2000, ‘Landscape pattern and species richness; regional scale analysis from remote sensing’, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 21, pp. 2685–2704.

Gulinck, H, Múgica, M, de Lucio, JV & Atauri, JA 2001, ‘A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain)’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 55, pp. 257–270.

Hay, GJ, Niemann, KO & Goodenough, DG 1997, ‘Spatial thresholds, image-objects and upscaling: A multi-scale evaluation’, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 62, pp. 1–19.

Global Land Cover Facility 2011, Earth science data interface. Available from: http://glcfapp.glcf.umd.edu:8080/esdi/. [2011.10.10].

Lechnio, J 2005, ‘Użytkowanie terenu w strefie oddziaływania PZM-P w okresie 1987-1999’ [Land use in the zone of impact of the Plock Urban-Industrial Complex in the period 1987-1999] in Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa, pp. 89–94.

Mander, U, Muller, F & Wrbka, T 2005, ‘Functional and structural landscape indicators: Upscaling and downscaling problems’, Ecological Indicators, vol. 5, pp. 267–272.

McGarigal, K, Tagil, S & Cushman, SA 2009, ‘Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure’, Landscape Ecol., vol. 24, pp. 433–450.

Piorr, HP 2003, ‘Environmental policy, agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicators’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 98, pp. 17–33.

Richling, A & Lechnio, J (eds) 2005, Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes], WGSR UW, Warszawa.

Richling, A & Lechnio, J 2012, ‛Krajobraz jako system hierarchiczny’ [Landscape as hierarchical system] in Model funkcjonalny systemu krajobrazowego [Functional model of the landscape system], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa, pp. 9–29.

Richling, A, Malinowska, E & Lechnio, J 2005, ‘Typologia i regionalizacja terenów w strefie oddziaływania Płockiego Zespołu Miejsko-Przemysłowego’ [Typology and regionalization terrain in the zone of influence of the Plock Urban-Industrial Complex] in Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa, pp. 29–54.

Richling, A, Malinowska, E & Szumacher, I 2012, ‘Typologia i regionalizacja krajobrazu jako wyraz hierarchicznej struktury środowiska’ [Typology and regionalization of landscape as an expression of the hierarchical structure of the environment] in Model funkcjonalny systemu krajobrazowego [Functional model of the landscape system], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa, pp. 31–76.

Roo-Zielińska, E, Solon, J & Degórski, M 2007, ‘Ocena stanu i przekształceń środowiska przyrodniczego na podstawie wskaźników geobotanicznych, krajobrazowych i glebowych’ [Assessment of the state and the transformation of the natural environment on the basis of geobotanic, landscape and soil indicators], IGiPZ PAN Monografie, vol. 9.

Solon, J 2002, ‘Ocena różnorodności krajobrazu na podstawie analizy struktury przestrzennej roślinności’ [Assessing the diversity of landscape based on an analysis of the spatial structure of vegetation], Prace Geograficzne, vol. 185.

Solon, J 2005, ‘Struktura roślinności jako indykator stanu i funkcjonowania krajobrazu’ [The structure of vegetation as an indicator of the status and functioning of the landscape] in Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of the functioning of lowland landscapes], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa, pp. 207–238.

Solon, J 2007, ‘Wpływ środowiska na zróżnicowanie kierunków rozwoju obszarów wiejskich’ [Impact of the environmental diversity on differentiation of rural development directions], Biuletyn KPZK, vol. 234, pp. 103–117.

Turner, MG 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 20, pp. 171–197.

Turner, MG, O’Neill, RV, Gardner, RH & Milne, BT 1989, ‘Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 153–162.

Uuemaa, E, Antrop, M, Roosaare, J, Marja, R & Mander, U 2009, ‘Landscape Metrics and Indices: An Overview of Their Use in Landscape Research’, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, vol. 3, no. 1.

Walz, U 2011, ‘Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity’, Living Rev. Landscape Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 5–35.

Wrbka, T, Reiter, K, Szerencsits, E, Niandl, P, Bartel, A, Schneider, W, Suppan, F & Beissmann, H 1998, ‘Landscape structure derived from satellite images as indicator for sustainable landuse’ in Proceedings of the EARSeL Symposium on Operational Remote Sensing for Sustainable Development, Enschede [11–15 May 1998].

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.73

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.404
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.759

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
14 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 51 51 21
PDF Downloads 14 14 9