Economic disengagement in state-society relations in Russia: A regional perspective

Open access


This paper makes the first attempt to measure economic disengagement in state-society relations on a regional level, using the case of Russia. An original composite index was calculated based on a number of indicators measuring different spheres of contact between the state and society. The study examines regional diversity in intensity of economic disengagement in state-society relations in Russia. It also attempts to identify determinants of economic disengagement on a regional level. Seeking to identify regional level predictors of the intensity of disengagement, the study focuses on the specificity of the Russian space – its federal structure based on a combination of territorial and ethnic principles. The results show that economic disengagement is least intense in regions belonging to the Russian Far North, which points to the role of physical-geographical factors and path dependence. They also reveal that residents of ethnically-defined regions tend to be less economically disengaged than residents of oblasts and krays. Moreover, the share of ethnic Russians is positively related to economic disengagement in the former regions, while it is not significant in the latter. These findings potentially point to differences between ethnic Russians and members of titular groups in terms of their intensity of interaction with the state in the economic sphere.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ABRAMOVA E. (2012): Krizisnaya samozanyatost’ v Rossii: klassifikatsiya struktura i urovni razvitiya. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. Regional’noe prilozhenie 4(32): 6–15.

  • ALL-RUSSIAN POPULATION CENSUS (2010): Rosstat [online]. [cit. 20.08.2013]. Available at

  • ANSELIN L. SYABRI I. KHO Y. (2006): GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis 38(1): 5–22.

  • AZARYA V. CHAZAN N. (1987): Disengagement from the state in Africa: reflections on the experience of Ghana and Guinea. Comparative Studies in Society and History 29(1): 106–131.

  • BAHRY D. (2002): Ethnicity and equality in post-communist economic transition: evidence from Russia’s republics. Europe-Asia Studies 54(5): 673–699.

  • BAKER B. (1997): Escape from domination: the concept of disengagement in Third World Studies. Politics 17(2): 87–94.

  • BRUNARSKA Z. (2015): Economic disengagement in state-society relations in Russia – analysis of a household survey. Eurasian Geography and Economics 56(5): 547–574.

  • BRUNARSKA Z. (2016): Disengagement in state-society relations in Russia – a regional perspective. Unpublished doctoral thesis Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies University of Warsaw.


  • CHISWICK B. (2008): Are immigrants favorably self-selected? An economic analysis. In: Brettell C. D. Hollifield J. F. [eds.]: Migration theory: talking across the disciplines. (pp. 52–75). New York Routledge.

  • CLARKE S. (2002): Making ends meet in contemporary Russia: secondary employment subsidiary agriculture and social networks. Bodmin Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • CLARKE S. KABALINA V. (1999): Employment in the new private sector in Russia. Post-Communist Economies 11(4): 421–443.

  • CODAGNONE C. FILIPPOV V. (2000): Equity exit and national identity in a multinational federation: the ‘multicultural constitutional patriotism’ project in Russia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 26(2): 263–288.

  • DECANCQ K. LUGO M. (2013): Weights in multidimensional indices of well-being: an overview. Econometric Reviews 32(1): 7–34.


  • DONAHOE B. (2011): On the creation of indigenous subjects in the Russian Federation. Citizenship Studies 15(3–4): 397–417.

  • DROBIZHEVA L. [ed.] (2002): Sotsial’noe neravenstvo etnicheskikh grupp: predstavleniya i real’nost’. Moscow Academia.


  • FREINKMAN L. PLEKHANOV A. (2010): Fiscal decentralization and the quality of public services in Russian regions. Public Finance and Management 10(1): 117–168.

  • GADM Database of Global Administrative Areas [online]. [cit. 20.11.2015]. Available at

  • GEL’MAN V. (2004): The unrule of law in the making: The politics of informal institution building in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 56(7): 1021–1040.

  • GIMPELSON V. TREISMAN D. (2002): Fiscal games and public employment: a theory with evidence from Russia. World Politics 54(2): 145–183.

  • GIMPELSON V. TREISMAN D. MONUSOVA G. (2000): Public employment and redistributive politics: evidence from Russia’s regions. IZA Discussion paper series 161.

  • GIULIANO E. (2011): Constructing grievance. Ethnic nationalism in Russia’s republics. Ithaca London Cornell University Press.

  • GRAY P. (2012): ‘I should have some deer but I don’t remember how many’: confused ownership of reindeer in Chukotka Russia. In: Khazanov A. M. Schlee G. [eds.]: Who owns the stock? Collective and multiple property rights in animals. (pp. 27–44). New York Oxford Berghahn Books.

  • GRØDELAND Å. B. (2008): Informal practice cultural capital and politics in the Czech Republic Slovenia Bulgaria and Romania. In: Pickles J. [ed.]: State and society in post-socialist economies. (pp. 229–252). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • GRESKOVITS B. (1998): The political economy of protest and patience. East European and Latin American transformations compared. Budapest Central European University Press.

  • HELENIAK T. (1999): Out-migration and depopulation of the Russian North during the 1990s. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 40(3): 155–205.

  • HIRSCHMAN A. (1970): Exit voice and loyalty: responses to decline in firms organizations and states. Cambridge Harvard University Press.

  • IVAKHNYUK I. IONTSEV V. (2012): Statistical data collection on migration in Russia. CARIM-East Explanatory Note 11/19. San Domenico di Fiesole Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies European University Institute.

  • KAISER R. (2000): Ethnic restratification in Russia’s republics. Washington The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research.

  • KAMINSKI B. (1991): The collapse of state socialism. The case of Poland. Princeton Princeton University Press.

  • KLIAMKIN I. TIMOFEEV L. (2001): The shadow life. A sociological self-portrait of post-Soviet society. Russian Politics and Law 39(4): 6–49.

  • KOSALS L. MAKSIMOVA A. (2015): Informality crime and corruption in Russia: A review of recent literature. Theoretical Criminology 19(2): 278–288.

  • LANKINA T. (2002): Local administration and ethno-social consensus in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 54(7): 1037–1053.

  • LEDENEVA A. (2006): How Russia really works. The informal practices that shaped post-Soviet politics and business. Ithaca and London Cornell University Press.

  • LEHMAN-WILZIG S. (1991): Loyalty voice and quasi-exit: Israel as a case study of proliferating alternative politics. Comparative Politics 24(1): 97–108.

  • LEHMAN-WILZIG S. N. (1992): Wildfire: grassroots revolts in Israel in the post-socialist era. Albany State University of New York Press.

  • MCMANN K. M. (2006): Economic autonomy and democracy. Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

  • MIKHAILOV V. (2015): Political social and ethnic protests in Bashkortostan and Tatarstan In: Ross C. [ed.]: Systemic and non-systemic opposition in the Russian Federation: civil society awakens? (pp. 153–178). London New York Routledge.

  • MKRTCHYAN N. (2004): ‘Zapadnyy dreyf’ vnutrirossiyskoy migratsii. Otechestvennye zapiski 4(19).

  • NOBLE M. WRIGHT G. SMITH G. DIBBEN C. (2006): Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environment and Planning A 38(1): 169–185.


  • O’LOUGHLIN J. FLINT C. ANSELIN L. (1994): The geography of the Nazi vote: context confession and class in the Reichstag election of 1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84(3): 351–380.

  • ORESHKIN D. ORESHKINA D. (2006): Geografiya elektoral’noy kul’tury Rossii. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ 5: 20–34.

  • OSWALD I. VORONKOV V. (2004): The ‘public-private’ sphere in Soviet and post-Soviet society. Perception and dynamics of ‘public’ and ‘private’ in contemporary Russia. European Societies 6(1): 97–117.

  • PALLOT J. NEFEDOVA T. (2003): Geographical differentiation in household plot production in rural Russia. Eurasian Geography and Economics 44(1): 40–64.

  • PARUOLO P. SAISANA M. SALTELLI A. (2013): Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 176(3): 609–634.

  • PROZOROV S. (2008): Russian postcommunism and the end of history. Studies in East European Thought 60(3): 207–230.


  • RIES N. (2009): Potato ontology: surviving postsocialism in Russia. Cultural Anthropology 24(2): 181–212.

  • ROGOŻA J. WIERZBOWSKA-MIAZGA A. WIŚNIEWSKA I. (2012): A captive island. Kaliningrad between Moscow and the EU. OSW Studies 41.

  • ROTHCHILD D. CHAZAN N. [eds.] (1988): The precarious balance: state and society in Africa. Boulder Westview Press.

  • ROUND J. (2005): Rescaling Russia’s geography: the challenges of depopulating the Northern periphery. Europe-Asia Studies 57(5): 705–727.

  • RYVKINA R. (2000): Tenevizatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva: prichiny i posledstviya. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 12: 3–13.

  • SHLAPENTOKH V. (1989): Public and private life of the Soviet people: changing values in post-Stalin Russia. Oxford Oxford University Press.

  • SHOMINA E. HEYWOOD F. (2013): Transformation in Russian housing: the new key roles of local authorities. International Journal of Housing Policy 13(3): 312–324.

  • THO SEETH H. CHACHNOV S. SURINOV A. VON BRAUN J. (1998): Russian poverty: muddling through economic transition with garden plots. World Development 26(9): 1611–1623.

  • THOMPSON N. (2002): Administrative resettlement and the pursuit of economy: the case of Chukotka. Polar Geography 26(4): 270–288.

  • WARD M. GLEDITSCH K. (2008): Spatial regression models. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore SAGE Publications Ltd.

  • WEGREN S. (2000): State withdrawal and the impact of marketization on rural Russia. Policy Studies Journal 28(1): 46–67.

  • WILLIAMS C. C. ROUND J. RODGERS P. (2011): Explaining the normality of informal employment in Ukraine: a product of exit or exclusion? American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70(3): 729–755.

  • WITES T. (2007): Wyludnianie Syberii i rosyjskiego Dalekiego Wschodu. Warsaw Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

  • VASILENKO E. (2007): Proekt ‘Chukotka’ kak model’ sotsial’noy otvetstvennosti biznesa v regione. Vlast’ 1.

  • VERKHOVSKAYA O. R. DOROKHINA M. V. (2013): Natsional’nyy otchet. Global’nyy monitoring predprinimatel’stva. Rossiya 2012. St. Petersburg Vysshaya Shkola Menedzhmenta Sankt-Peterburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta.


  • ZINOVIEV A. (1982): Gomo sovetikus [online]. [cit. 10.03.2015]. Available at

  • ZUBAREVICH N. (2011): Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie respublik Severnogo Kavkaza: kolichestvennye i ekspertnye otsenki. In: Sotsial’nyy atlas rossiyskikh regionov. Portrety regionov. Moskva Nezavisimyy institut sotsial’noy politiki [online]. [cit. 2.05.2015]. Available at

  • ZUBAREVICH N. (2012): Sotsial’naya differentsiatsiya regionov i gorodov. Pro et Contra July–October: 135–152.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 115 115 5
PDF Downloads 85 85 4