Business models in urban farming: A comparative analysis of case studies from Spain, Italy and Germany


The “Urban Agriculture Europe” EU COST-Action (2012–2016) has shown that the complexity of urban agriculture (UA) is hardly compressible into classic business management models and has proposed new management models, such as the Business Model Canvas (BMC). Business models of UA have to be different from rural ones. In particular, factors such as differentiation and diversification, but also low cost-oriented specialisation, are characteristic and necessary business models for UA to stay profitable in the long term under challenging city conditions. This paper aims to highlight how farm enterprises have to adjust to urban conditions by stepping into appropriate business models aiming to stay competitive and profitable, and how the BMC is useful to analyse their organisation and performance, both economically and socially. The paper offers an inter-regional analysis of UA enterprises located in Spain, Italy, and Germany, which are further subdivided into: local food, leisure, educational, social, therapeutic, agri-environmental, cultural heritage and experimental farms. The analysis demonstrates that UA is differentially adjusted to specific urban conditions and that the BMC is useful for analysing urban farming. Heterogeneous local food farms and the integration of local and organic food production in social farming business models are most frequent in our case studies.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALONSO, W. (1964): Location and Land Use. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

  • ANTROP, M. (2005): Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2): 21–34.

  • AUBRY, C., KEBIR, L. (2013): Shortening food supply chains: A means for maintaining agriculture close to urban areas? The case of the French metropolitan area of Paris. Food Policy, 41: 85–93.

  • BAILEY, A., WILLIAMS, N., PALMER, M., GEERING, R. (2000): The farmer as a service provider: The demand for agricultural commodities and equine services. Agricultural Systems, 66: 191–204.

  • BEAUCHESNE, A., BRYANT, C. (1999): Agriculture and Innovation in the Urban Fringe: The Case of Organic Farming in Quebec, Canada. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie, 90(3): 320–328.

  • BOONS, F., LÜDEKE-FREUND, F. (2013): Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45: 9–19.

  • BRINKLEY, C. R. (2012): Evaluating the benefits of Peri-Urban Agriculture. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(3): 259–269.

  • BRYANT, C., SANCHEZ, N. C., DELUSCA, K., DAOUDA, O., SARR, A. (2013): Metropolitan Vulnerability and Strategic Roles for Peri-urban Agricultural Territories in the Context of Climate Change and Vulnerability. Cuadernos de Geografia, 22(2): 55–68.

  • BUCIEGA, A., PITARCH, M. D., ESPARCIA, J. (2009): The context of rural-urban relationships in Finland, France, Hungary, the Netherlands and Spain. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(1): 9–27.

  • BUSCK, A. G., KRISTENSEN, S. P., PRAESTHOLM, S., REENBERG, A., PRIMDAHL, J. (2006): Land system changes in the context of urbanization: Examples from the peri-urban area of Greater Copenhagen. Geografisk Tidsskrift (Danish Journal of Geography), 106(2): 21–34.

  • DUPRAS, J., PARCERISAS, L., BRENNER, J. (2016): Using ecosystem services valuation to measure the economic impacts of land-use changes on the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme, 1850–2010). Regional Environmental Change, 16(4): 1075–1088.

  • ELGÅKER, H., WILTON, B. (2008): Horse farms as a factor for development and innovation in the urban-rural fringe with examples from Europe and Northern America. Forest & Landscape Working Papers, 27. Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen.

  • FAO (2007): Profitability and sustainability of urban and peri-urban agriculture. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Finance. Rome, FAO.

  • FERGUSON, D. T. (2014): Night-soil and the ‘Great Divergence’: Human waste, the urban economy, and economic productivity, 1500–1900. Journal of Global History, 9(3): 379–402.

  • GARDNER, B. L. (1994): Commercial Agriculture in Metropolitan Areas: Economics and Regulatory Issues. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 23(1): 100–109.

  • GANGULY, S., KUJAC, P., LEONARD, M., WAGNER, J., WORTHINGTON, Z. (2011): Lively’ Hood Farm. Strategy Plan. [cit. 12.3.2014]. Available at:

  • HEDIN, D. I. (2015): The business models of commercial urban farming in developed countries. Masters thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Economics. Uppsala. [cit. 20.9.2016]. Available at:

  • HEIMLICH, R. E., BARNARD, C. H. (1992): Agricultural Adaption to Urbanization: Farm Types in Northeast Metropolitan Areas. Northeastern journal of agricultural and resource economics, 21(1): 50–60.

  • HENRIKSEN, K., BJERRE, M., ALMASI, A. M., DAMGAARD-GRANN, E. (2012): Green Business Model Innovation. Conceptualization report. Nordic Innovation Publication. [cit. 12.3.2014]. Available at:

  • HOUSTON, P. (2005): Re-valuing the Fringe: Some Findings on the Value of Agricultural Production in Australia’s Peri-Urban Regions. Geographical Research, 43(2): 209–223.

  • KORTHALS ALTES, W. K., VAN RIJ, E. (2013): Planning the horticultural sector: Managing greenhouse sprawl in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 31(1): 486–497.

  • LIU, S. (2015): Business Characteristics and Business Model Classification in Urban Agriculture. Master thesis. Wageningen, Wageningen University and Research Centre. (February 2nd, 2016)

  • LOHRBERG, F. (2010): Urbane Agrarlandschaften. In: Valentin, D., [ed.]: Wiederkehr der Landschaft (pp. 24–33). Berlin, Jovis.

  • LOHRBERG, F., TIMPE, A. (2011): Urbane Agrikultur. Neue Formen der Primärproduktion in der Stadt. Planerin, 5: 35–37.

  • LOHRBERG, F., LIČKA, L., SCAZZOSI, L., TIMPE, A. [eds.] (2016): Urban agriculture Europe. Berlin, Jovis.

  • LOVELL, S. T. (2010): Multifunctional Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Land Use Planning in the United States. Sustainability 2010, 2(8): 2499–2522.

  • LUNDY, M., AMREIN, A., HURTADO, J. J., BECX, G., ZAMIEROWSKI, N., RODRÍGUEZ, F., MOSQUERA, E. E. (2014): LINK methodology: a participatory guide to business models that link smallholders to markets. Version 2.0. Cali, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT).

  • MCCLINTOCK N. (2014): Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: coming to terms with urban agriculture’s contradiction. Local Environment, 19(2): 147–171.

  • MOUGEOT, L. J. A. (2000): Urban Agriculture: definition, presence, potentials and risks, and policy challenges. Cities Feeding People Series Report 31. Ottawa, International Development Research Centre (IDCR).

  • NATIONALE FEDERATIE STADSGERICHTE LANDBOUW (2013): Stadsboeren in Nederland. Professionalisering van de stadsgerichte landbouw. [cit. 13.3.2014]. Available at:

  • NGUYEN, T., TRUONG, M. (2013): The Business Plan. Case: Organic Farm in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Bachelor’s Thesis in International Business. Lahti University of Applied Sciences. [cit. 12.3.2014]. Available at:

  • OPITZ, I., BERGES, R., PIORR, A., KRIKSER, T. (2016): Contributing to food security in urban areas: Differences between urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture in the Global North. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(2): 341–358.

  • OSTERWALDER, A., PIGNEUR, Y. (2010): Business Model Generation. [cit. 11.3.2014]. Available at:

  • PÉRON, J. Y., GEOFFRIAU, E. (2007): Characteristics and Sustainable Development of Peri-Urban Vegetable Production in Europe. ISHS Acta Horticulture, International Symposium on Horticultural Plants in Urban and Peri-Urban Life, 62: 159–170.

  • PIORR, A., RAVETZ, J., TOSICS, I. (2011): Peri-Urbanisation in Europe: Towards European Policies to Sustain Urban-Rural Futures; Forest and Landscape, Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen.

  • PÖLLING, B., LORLEBERG, W., ORSINI, F., MAGREFI, F., HOEKSTRA, F., RENTING, H., ACCORSI, M. (2015): Business models in Urban Agriculture – answering cost pressures and societal needs. Conference Paper. Agriculture in an Urbanizing Society. September 2015. Rome, Italy.

  • PÖLLING, B. (2016): Comparison of Farm Structures, Success Factors, Obstacles, Clients’ Expectations and Policy Wishes of Urban Farming’s Main Business Models in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Sustainability, 8(5): 446.

  • PÖLLING, B., MERGENTHALER, M., LORLEBERG, W. (2016): Professional urban agriculture and its characteristic business models in Metropolis Ruhr, Germany. Land Use Policy, 58: 366–379.

  • PRAIN, G., DE ZEEUW, H. (2007): Enhancing technical, organizational and institutional innovation in urban agriculture. Urban Agriculture Magazine (RUAF), 19: 9–15.

  • QUETIER, F. F., GORDON, I. J. (2003): “Horticulture”: How important a land use change in Scotland? Scottish Geographical Journal, 119: 153–159.

  • SIEBERT, R., DOSCH, A., VOLGMANN, A. (2009): Arbeit und Einkommen im ländlichen Raum. Chancen durch Diversifizierung. Ministerium für Infrastruktur und Landwirtschaft des Landes Brandenburg (Hrsg., October 7th 2014).

  • SIMON-ROJO, M. et al. (2015): From urban food gardening to urban farming. In: Lohrberg, F., Licka, L., Scazzosi, L., Timpe, A. [eds.]: Urban Agriculture Europe (pp. 22–28), Berlin, Jovis.

  • TORQUATI, B., TANCINI, C., PAFFARINI, C., ILLUMINATI, R. (2015): Empirical survey on business models of kindergarten farms. Agricultural and Food Economics, 3(1): 25.

  • VAN DER SCHANS, J. W. (2010): Urban Agriculture in the Netherlands. Urban Agriculture Magazine, 24: 40–42.

  • VAN DER SCHANS, J. W. (2015): Business models urban agriculture (online) [cit. 1.1.2016]. Available at:

  • VAN DER SCHANS, J. W. et al. (2016): It Is a Business! Business Models in Urban Agriculture. In: Lohrberg, F., Licka, L., Scazzosi, L., Timpe, A. [eds.]: Urban Agriculture Europe (pp. 82–91). Berlin, Jovis.

  • VOGL, C. R., AXMANN, P., VOGL-LUKASSER, B. (2003): Urban organic farming in Austria with the concept of Selbsternte (“self-harvest”): An agronomic and socio-economic analysis. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 19(2): 67–79.

  • WISKERKE, J. S. C. (2009): On regions lost and regions regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies, 14(4): 369–387.

  • YOKOHARI, M., BROWN, R. D., TAKEUCHI, K. (1994): A framework for the conservation of rural ecological landscapes in the urban fringe area in Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29: 103–116.

  • ZASADA, I. (2011): Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture–A review of societal demand and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4): 639–648.

  • ZASADA, I., FERTNER, C., PIORR, A., NIELSEN, T. S. (2011): Peri-urbanization and multifunctional adaptation of agriculture around Copenhagen. Geografisk Tidsskrift (Danish Journal of Geography), 111(1): 59–72.

  • ZASADA, I., BERGES, R., HILGENDORF, J., PIORR, A. (2013): Horsekeeping and the peri-urban development in the Berlin Metropolitan Region. Journal of Land Use Science, 8(2): 199–214.


Journal + Issues